@GovBraun Indiana is still built around the second car. About 85% of workers commute by automobile. Public transit is 0.6% of commutes. Fast-growing suburbs such as Fishers, Carmel, and Noblesville have no municipal fixed-route bus system. Indiana also has no statewide law authorizing driverless passenger service. Federal policy still leaves that to the states. Please support legislation that treats the automated driving system as the operator, authorizes on-demand robotaxi networks, sets insurance and reporting rules, and blocks a patchwork of local bans. Purpose-built Cybercabs are already in paid service elsewhere. Indiana should not sit this out.
@GovBraun Michigan legalized on-demand robotaxis in 2016. Detroit already has a self-driving shuttle and Waymo is lining up for 2026. Indianaโs public transit is still โhope the bus shows up.โ Pass the Cybercab legislation and make the Crossroads the first Midwest state that actually leads instead of watching Michigan collect the fleets. Even the Colts would get there faster. ๐
@GovBraun Michigan legalized on-demand robotaxis in 2016. Detroit already has a self-driving shuttle and Waymo is lining up for 2026. Indianaโs public transit is still โhope the bus shows up.โ Pass the Cybercab legislation and make the Crossroads the first Midwest state that actually leads instead of watching Michigan collect the fleets. Even the Colts would get there faster. ๐ @elonmusk@tesla@robotaxi
@Evautoalex@elonmusk@SawyerMerritt This is exactly what Tesla should NOT do. They should offer the Cybercabs to individual buyers.. ie: All the Uber drivers who are about to be out of a job. Make it more open-source...not centralized. @elonmusk@robotaxi@tesla