Ly

De vrijheid is iets waar men voor zal moet blijven strijden of zoals je ziet wordt deze voor je eigen ogen van je afgenomen.

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

Great news!
Miles Guo （AKA Wengui Guo, or Kwok) — a fake anti-CCP figure who, in reality, served Xi Jinping's Operation Trust in the United States — was sentenced today to 30 years in federal prison for the massive fraud he committed under the banner of "anti-CCP."
• The prosecution's sentencing calculation even reached Offense Level 55 (capped at Level 43 under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines), underscoring the extraordinary severity of his crimes.
• Guo’s RICO enterprise, also conducted cognitive warfare under the guise of fighting the CCP—mixing CCP-desired false narratives into otherwise truthful information to poison the information environment.
• Lude and I were the first whistleblowers to report Miles Guo's organization to the U.S. government and expose it as a fake anti-CCP operation engaged in unrestricted warfare. Today's sentence is justice served.
• It is also a direct rebuke to those media outlets and individuals who echoed the CCP's smears by falsely accusing Lude and me of being associated with Miles Guo's criminal enterprise!

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

NO!
The central factor behind the creation, cover-up, and global spread of #COVID19 was not USAID funding. https://t.co/AVXHUIAvmo
• The central factor was Xi Jinping's direct control and the CCP's decades-long clandestine unrestricted bioweapons program.
• The key evidence was exposed as early as 2020 in the #YanReports:
The laboratory development of SARS-CoV-2 was built upon the Zhoushan bat coronaviruses ZC45 and ZXC21, viral backbones discovered and uniquely controlled by the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA).
• Yes, there were people in the United States who promoted dangerous collaborations, ignored warnings, funded high-risk research, and even helped suppress investigations.
Those actions deserve full accountability.
• But without CCP’s
- state secrecy apparatus

- military-civil fusion programs

- nationwide censorship and information control

- destruction and concealment of evidence

- transnational influence and cover-up networks

- state immunity and diplomatic protection…
COVID-19 could never have evolved into a historic catastrophe that killed millions and reshaped the world order!
• The CCP invested vastly more money, manpower, intelligence resources, and political power into these programs than all foreign research grants combined.
❗️Do not focus only on who helped.
• Focus on who designed the system, controlled the system, concealed the system, and ultimately exploited the pandemic.
‼️The CCP was not a passive recipient of foreign funding.
• It was the architect, the operator, and the ultimate beneficiary of the entire enterprise.

[Rand Paul @RandPaul]

For years, I raised alarms about dangerous gain-of-function research being farmed out to foreign countries, and I was told it was a conspiracy theory. Now, declassified documents show that the U.S. funded over 120 biolabs across more than 30 countries. Some of this research was conducted overseas precisely because scientists knew it would face scrutiny on American soil.

I'm calling for a presidential commission of scientists to review all gain-of-function research going forward. We're going lab by lab and pathogen by pathogen until the American people know the full truth.

https://t.co/gtv6sZ7viR

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

This ODNI declassification involves the initial discussions surrounding the release of my First Yan Report on Sep 14, 2020 (https://t.co/Xl75So0EeG)
What is shown here is only the tip of the iceberg. These emails expose part of the intense cognitive warfare conducted by the CCP and forces aligned with Fauci to suppress global investigations into the truth of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the transnational persecution and suppression of whistleblowers. These revelations deserve careful examination.
Key Points
1.
On the very day I released the 1st Yan Report on the origin of COVID-19, DHS requested that the Intelligence Community analyze and discuss it.
* However, someone within the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), without genuinely reviewing the contents, immediately characterized the report as “nonsense,” claiming that its conclusions were inconsistent with the “natural origin” narrative that had been promoted under Fauci’s leadership.
* This raises a critical question:
Was INR misled, or were certain individuals intentionally participating in efforts to suppress investigations into the origin of COVID-19?
* More importantly, the email contains the following statement:
“A couple virologists at State and I reviewed a version of her paper — it's been circulating for at least a month or so.”
This statement is demonstrably false.
* The report was uploaded and published on Zenodo at approximately 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on September 14, 2020.
One month earlier, the report had not even been completed, and it had not been provided to anyone for review.
How, then, could this individual have seen it “a month earlier”?
2.
The following day, September 15, another effort was made to smear and discredit both me personally and the scientific evidence presented in my COVID-19 origin report by circulating a false narrative published in The Daily Beast.
That article was based entirely on false narratives promoted by the CCP.
* It was fully consistent with the large-scale disinformation campaigns later advanced by the CCP through outlets such as The New York Times, https://t.co/7qpBXxOYBa, and many others, as well as with the CCP’s broader campaign of transnational persecution directed against me.
* BTW, my first Twitter account—which had posted nothing except a link to the Yan Report—was permanently suspended on that very same day.
The suspension shocked observers around the world.
3.
Truth is eventually seen and verified.
In the evening of Sep 14, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory requested that a group discussion (“circle up”) be organized to review the report.
* The reason was straightforward:
They considered portions of the scientific evidence presented in the report to be credible and worthy of further detailed examination.
* They also proposed bringing personnel from Los Alamos National Laboratory into the discussion.
4.
As additional members of the Intelligence Community carefully reviewed the report, a Sep 18 email showed that, based on the important illustration in the Yan Report describing the technical feasibility of laboratory synthesis of SARS-CoV-2, together with the report’s extensive chain of evidence built from hundreds of scientific references, analysts had already confirmed that the laboratory-origin pathway I described was technically feasible.
* The email further noted that these methods were sufficiently mature that even undergraduate students could readily learn and apply them, and that the evidence pointed directly toward the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
* This is particularly significant because Fauci and the CCP were aggressively insisting at the time that a laboratory origin was “technically impossible.”
5.
It is important to remember that by following the technical pathway laid out in the Yan Reports, investigators can conclusively establish that the CCP’s military-civil fusion biological weapons system—represented by the Wuhan Institute of Virology—possessed the relevant capabilities, researchers, scientific publications, and research foundation necessary to conduct such work.
The same evidence also exposes the false “scientific research” narratives regarding viral origins that were jointly promoted by the CCP and Fauci-associated interests.
Furthermore, the evidence points directly and unequivocally to the coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21, originally discovered by the PLA in bat populations near Zhoushan in 2017, as the true templates of SARS-CoV-2.
6.
As I keep telling the world, COVID-19 virus is an Unrestricted Bioweapon. Xi Jinping-CCP developed and released it intentionally and caused the historical disaster! Hold it accountable and prevent it in the future!

[Dr. Li-Meng YAN @DrLiMengYAN1]

【2026年6月20日 “路德社-闫博士说”直播】
笑死！彼得·达扎克 (Peter Daszak) 破防了：因ODNI解密“闫报告”贡献而癫狂发推！美DOJ追查哈梅内伊家族黑钱！
https://t.co/fuNbBlb1na

[Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 @TulsiGabbard]

Yesterday was my final day as Director of National Intelligence. I declassified and released never-before-seen documents exposing the truth about Fauci directing millions of US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth. Go to https://t.co/tVwWp0TxZ4 to see for yourself.

[U.S. Pacific Command @USPACOM]

Department of War Restores U.S. Pacific Command Designation.

CAMP H.M. SMITH, Hawaii — The Department of War announced today that the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM) will officially restore its name to the U.S. Pacific Command (USPACOM).

Originally established on January 1, 1947, by President Harry S. Truman, the command operated under the USPACOM banner for over 70 years, standing as the oldest and largest of the United States' unified combatant commands.

Restoring the legacy USPACOM designation honors the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific. From its critical role in establishing the post-WWII regional security architecture to its coordination of joint forces during the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and countless humanitarian operations, the USPACOM namesake carries decades of military heritage and enduring regional partnerships.

USPACOM’s vast area of responsibility—spanning from the waters off the West Coast of the United States to the western border of India—remains exactly the same. The command's fundamental mission and its unwavering commitment to maintaining a free and open theater alongside regional allies and partners are unchanged.

https://t.co/5zeycP2lip

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

“The Deal with Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete. Congratulations to all!” President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

Happy Birthday to the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. A relentless patriot who fights every day for the country he loves, the people he serves, and the American Dream. 🇺🇸🇺🇸

[Dr. Lawrence Sellin @LawrenceSellin]

As a bio/chem warfare defense expert, I reviewed the intelligence released by @DNIGabbard
The biolabs, especially in war zones, represent a potential health hazard, but, primarily, they seem to be boondoggles: "a wasteful or impractical project or activity often involving graft."

[Secretary of War Pete Hegseth @SecWar]

Happy birthday to the COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF DONALD J. TRUMP.

[Steve Yates (葉望輝) @SteveYates]

For over 15 years, I have enjoyed wit, wisdom, and occasional snark while talking politics, policy, and national security with @DLoesch. Here's yesterday's fun on @DanaLoeschRadio. Even got into the killer movie star looks of Japan's defense minister. No boundaries...

[Senator Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnson]

https://t.co/w6XLnaQunN

[Jan B. Hommel @BumblebeeJoe]

Nederlandse viroloog in de VS vervolgd om smokkel van het mpox-virus https://t.co/6TARE3F2Vv

Is de #wasbeerhond al gearresteerd, @mkeulemans en @MarionKoopmans?

#OriginOfCovid

[Ly @mo_liying]

兩名荷蘭病毒專家被控走私MPOX-virus痘病毒進入美國。

[Jan B. Hommel @BumblebeeJoe]

Nederlandse viroloog in VS aangeklaagd voor invoer mpox-virus https://t.co/ae1gy2sOCO

Dit is wel grappig...

Vincent Munster komt uit de school van Ab Osterhaus. Hij promoveerde onder Osterhaus en bleef daarna nog enkele jaren hangen als postdoc. In 2009 vertrok hij naar de Verenigde Staten om onderzoek te doen aan de Rocky Mountains Laboratories (RML).

Begin 2020 schreef hij samen met @MarionKoopmans en een aantal andere auteurs een artikel over #SARSCoV2 in het NEJM.

Maar het allerleukste is dit:

Blijkbaar vertelde Koopmans op de achterbank tegen @pricklyresearch dat zij op deze manier Zika uit Brazilië gesmokkeld had.

Zoals iedereen weet, is dat ook niet zo moeilijk. Kleine flesjes met vloeistof in de ruimbagage worden vrijwel nooit gecontroleerd en al helemaal niet op virusmateriaal.

Ik vroeg me af of deze mensen ooit echt dit risico zouden willen nemen. Maar het antwoord is dus ja. En het maakt het verhaal van Edward Hammand een stuk geloofwaardiger.

Hoe zegt men dat ook alweer? Goed voorbeeld doet goed volgen?

https://t.co/Je9NsUhV77

[Wierd Duk ܦܝܪܬ ܕܘܟ @wierdduk]

Ik leg dit hier even neer:

[GEWOON ⚓️ MEREL @gewoonmerels]

☎️ Marion Koopmans loog onder ede over Chinese “privacy”-redenen voor het niet delen van patiëntendata !!

Op 29 mei 2026 verklaarde prof. dr. Marion Koopmans onder ede tijdens het openbaar verhoor van de parlementaire enquêtecommissie Corona het volgende:

“Ja, dat is, dat als ik dat in mijn ziekenhuis vraag, krijg je die ook niet zomaar. Daar zijn processen voor, dat moet je, daar moet je medisch-ethische toetsings eh commissies eerst eh voorleggen.

Daar heb je juridische afspraken voor, privacyregels voor. [...] En dat is in China niet anders.”

Zij stelde expliciet dat China ruwe patiëntendata niet deelde vanwege privacyregels, medisch-ethische procedures en juridische afspraken... en dat dit “in China niet anders” zou zijn dan in Nederland.

Deze verklaring is onjuist, de feitelijke werkelijkheid:

Op 12 september 2019... meer dan drie maanden vóór de eerste officiële melding van de uitbraak... verwijderde het Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) de volledige openbare database met tienduizenden coronavirusstammen en sequenties proactief en zonder enige aankondiging, midden in de nacht.

Dit was geen normale privacy- of ethische procedure. Het betrof gerichte staatsobstructie. Dit wordt bevestigd door:

U.S. House Report / Rep. Barr (2 augustus 2021)
U.S. Department of State Fact Sheet (15 januari 2021)
U.S. Intelligence Community Report (juni 2023, declassified)
British Medical Journal (2024)

China weigerde vervolgens structureel om laboratoriumnotitieboeken, ruwe data en andere essentiële informatie te verstrekken.

Conclusie: Door actieve Chinese staatsobstructie te presenteren als een routineuze privacykwestie die “in China niet anders” is, heeft Marion Koopmans de parlementaire enquêtecommissie bewust misleid onder ede.

Dit is geen interpretatiekwestie, maar een directe tegenstrijdigheid met vaststaande feiten.

#COVID19 #OMT #Koopmans #RIVM #Onderzoek

[Denachtzuster(s) @Denachtzuster1]

28/5/26 - De Schijn Die Geen Schijn Bleek: Marion Koopmans, de Gezondheidsraad en de Onvolledige Verklaring omtrent Belangenverstrengeling 🧵1/2

In eerste instantie leek het puur administratief. @MarionKoopmans prominent viroloog bij @ErasmusMC en lid van meerdere commissies van de @Gezondheidsraad, vulde een verklaring omtrent belangenverstrengeling in. Standaardprocedure voor experts met internationale rollen. Niets aan de hand, zou je denken. Tot de details naar boven kwamen, en die bleken alarmerend.

Koopmans had een onbetaald adviseurschap in China via het @rivm vervuld. Dit was officieel bekend bij de Nederlandse overheid. Toch ontbrak een expliciete vermelding van deze relatie in haar openbare verklaring omtrent belangenverstrengeling bij de Gezondheidsraad, de organisatie waarvan zij zelf commissielid was (onder meer Commissie Vaccinaties en COVID19). De Gezondheidsraad beoordeelde en publiceerde haar eigen verklaring, een klassiek geval van schijn van belangenverstrengeling: de club keurt de club.

Van formaliteit naar rode vlag

Wat begon als een ogenschijnlijk onschuldige formaliteit, kreeg steeds meer gewicht door latere onthullingen. Koopmans stond in oktober 2021 op de voorgestelde lijst voor de WHO’s “Scientific Advisory Group for the Origins of Novel Pathogens” (SAGO). Er ontstond forse publieke kritiek over mogelijke belangenverstrengeling , bias en haar rol in de eerste WHO-missie naar Wuhan, waarna Koopmans een lab-incident “extremely unlikely” noemde. Uiteindelijk deed zij niet mee in de definitieve groep.

Vrijgegeven documenten en hoorzittingen tonen dat Koopmans (samen met Ron Fouchier en Christian Drosten) deelnam aan de cruciale conference call van 1 februari 2020 met onder anderen Fauci en Collins. Zij beïnvloedde het invloedrijke Proximal Origin-artikel, dat het lab-scenario marginaliseerde en discussies over de furin cleavage site afremde om “conspiracy theories” te voorkomen.

De bredere Nederlandse virologengroep

Dit gaat niet alleen over Koopmans. Het netwerk rond Erasmus MC (Koopmans, Fouchier) en alumni zoals Vincent Munster (betrokken bij DARPA PREEMPT-projecten over self-spreading vaccins en vleermuis-coronavirussen) laat nauwe banden zien met risicovol gain-of-function-onderzoek.

Zes jaar na de uitbraak blijven cruciale documenten over DEFUSE, PREEMPT, vroege DIA-analyses (maart 2020 lab-leak scenario) en State Department-bewijzen zwaar geredigeerd of geclassificeerd. Klokkenluiders en aanklachten (zoals tegen David Morens) wijzen op systematische obstructie van FOIA-verzoeken en vroege consensus-building tegen de lab-leak-hypothese.

Koopmans nuanceerde later de “extremely unlikely”-formulering, maar bleef een natuurlijke oorsprong benadrukken. Ondertussen voelen miljoenen Nederlanders nog dagelijks de gevolgen van lockdowns, vaccinatiedruk en economische schade — terwijl het echte verhaal over de bron grotendeels verborgen blijft.

Waarom dit ertoe doet

De onvolledige verklaring omtrent belangenverstrengeling was in eerste instantie “niet direct problematisch”. Met de kennis van nu, de China relaties, de vroege beïnvloeding van narratieven, het gebrek aan transparantie in een extreem gevoelig dossier, is de door Koopmans afgegeven onvolledige verklaring aan een clubje waar ze zelf onderdeel van was meer dan problematisch. Het illustreert een structureel falen: experts met meerdere petten adviseren over onderwerpen waarbij hun eigen netwerken en verleden direct relevant zijn, terwijl de controlemechanismen (zoals zelfbeoordeling binnen de Gezondheidsraad) ontoereikend blijken.

Volledige openbaarmaking van alle relevante documenten, onafhankelijk onderzoek en veel strengere regels voor belangenverstrengeling zijn geen luxe. Ze zijn een absolute voorwaarde voor het herstel van vertrouwen in wetenschap

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

Memorial Day isn’t about barbecues or beach days—it’s about those American heroes who gave everything for our freedom.

THIS 70-SECOND VIDEO CAPTURES WHAT THE DAY IS TRULY ABOUT. 🇺🇸