Dennis Johnson

Co-founder and publisher of @melvillehouse US & UK. Now on Mastodon: @[email protected]

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

Dear Donald Trump: As the publisher of Anna Politkovskaya's last book, let me say this to you: Fuck you for laughing. https://t.co/CfAl4Kpd6A

[Alec Luhn @AlecLuhn]

"These are the ones that insulted you?" Putin asked Trump, gesturing at the journalists being ushered out of the room. Chuckles all around https://t.co/yNiAF3Skfr

[Yanis Varoufakis @yanisvaroufakis]

A video-text summary of my argument that we now live in the age of TECHNOFEUDALISM (in 16', 2000 words):

Wherever we turn, we witness the triumph of capital. Capital has prevailed everywhere: in warehouses, factories, offices, universities, public hospitals, the media – in space but also in the microcosm of genetic engineering. So, how do I dare claim that capitalism has been killed? By whom? The deliciously ironic answer is that capitalism was killed by its own hand… by capital!

If I am right, the issue is not what AI will do to us in the future but what has already happened: Capital became so dominant that it mutated into a variant so toxic that, like a stupid virus, it killed off its host, capitalism, replacing it with something far, far worse.

This new mutant capital, that killed capitalism, lives in the proverbial cloud – so, let us call it cloud capital.

What is cloud capital? What makes it so different?

Cloud capital, of course, does not really live up in the cloud. It lives down on Earth, comprising networked machines, server farms, cell towers, software, AI-driven algorithms – and of course it lives on our oceans’ floors where untold miles of optic fibre cables rest.

Unlike traditional capital, from fishing rods to the steam-engines of the Industrial Revolution to today’s modern industrial robots that are produced means of production, cloud capital does not produce anything – it comprises machines manufactured so as to modify human behaviour.

That’s what Amazon’s Alexa or Google’s Assistant or Apple’s Siri is: It is a produced means of behavioural modification. It is a machine, a piece of capital, which we train to train us to train it to determine that which we want. And, once we want it, the same networked machine sells it to us, directly, bypassing markets.

As if that were not enough, the same machinery succeeds in making us sustain the enormous behavioural modification machine network to which it belongs with our free voluntary labour. We are sustaining it as we post reviews, rate products, upload videos, rants, photos - we help reproduce cloud capital without getting a penny for our labour. In essence, it has turned us into its cloud serfs!

Meanwhile, in the factories and the warehouses, where waged proletarians work under increasingly precarious conditions, the same algorithms that modify our behaviour and sell products to us directly – those algorithms are deployed, usually by digital devices tied to the workers’ wrists, to make proletarians, workers in the warehouses, in the factories work faster, to direct and to monitor them in real time.

I started by saying that wherever we turn, we stumble on the triumph of capital. But it is cloud capital that is the real winner. It is amazing how it performs, at once, five roles that used to be beyond capital’s capacities: Cloud capital grabs our attention. It manufactures our desires. It sells to us, directly, outside any traditional markets, that which is going to satiate the desires it made us have. It drives proletarian labour inside the workplaces. And it elicits massive free labour from us, its cloud-serfs.

Is it surprising that the owners of this cloud capital – let’s call them cloudalists – have a hitherto undreamt power to extract? To extract gargantuan surplus value from proletarians; untold quantities of free labour from almost everyone; and mind-numbing cloud rents from vassal capitalists – from sellers? Is it a wonder that they are vastly more powerful than Henry Ford or Rupert Murdoch could ever be?

“Hang on”, I hear you say. “Is Jeff Bezos really different to Henry Ford? Aren’t they all a species of monopoly capitalists? Monopolists?” No, https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN is not a monopolistic capitalist enterprise.

The moment you enter https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN you have exited capitalism altogether! Sure enough, the place is teaming with buyers and sellers. So, yes, it is an enormous trading platform but, no, a market it certainly is not! One man called Jeff owns everything. But he is much, much more than a mere monopolist.

Jeff doesn’t own the factories that produce the stuff sold on his platform by traditional capitalists who have to use it to ply their trade. What he does own is more important: Jeff owns the algorithm that decides which products you see and which you don’t – the very algorithm that you have trained to know you perfectly so that it matches youwith a seller, whom it also knows perfectly well, with a view to maximising the probability that every such match, transaction, will generate, for Jeff, the highest rent that Jeff can charge the seller for what you buy: up to 40% of what you pay is pocketed by Jeff, the cloudalist!

The mind rebels at the enormity but also the radical novelty of this kind of exploitation: The same algorithm that we help train in real time to know us inside out - that same algorithm both modifies our preferences and administers the selection and delivery of commodities that will satisfy these preferences.

If you and I were to type “electric bicycles” or “binoculars” while in https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN, you and I would get totally different recommendations. In a traditional market or shopping mall it would be as if you and I were walking next to each other, our eyes trained in the same direction, the same shop window, but we were to see different things depending on what Jeff’s algorithm wants each one of us to see.

Everyone navigating around https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN – except Jeff Bezos of course – everyone in https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN is wandering around in algorithmically constructed isolation as if in a Panopticon where, unable to see each other, we only see Jeff’s all-seeing algorithm or, more accurately, only what his algorithm allows us to see with a view to maximising his cloud rent – which is, of course, today’s version of the ground rent that the feudal lords used to extract from their vassals and their peasants.

This is not capitalism. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to technofeudalism!

How did cloud capital kill capitalism? How did it rise up? Who paid for it?

Capitalism, lest we forget, had two pillars: markets and profit. Of course, markets and profit remain ubiquitous. Nevertheless, cloud capital has evicted both markets and profit from the centre of our socioeconomic system, pushing them out to its margins, and replacing them:

Markets, the medium of capitalism, have been replaced by cloud fiefs – digital trading platforms like https://t.co/fw3K5QRhqN or Alibaba which, as we saw, look like, but are not, markets.

And Profit? The fuel of capitalism? Well, that has been replaced by its feudal predecessor: rent. But, specifically, a new form of rent, a cloud rent that must be paid for access to those cloud fiefs or digital platforms.

But how did cloud capital emerge?It began life in the late 1990s when the original Internet, which was a Commons – it functioned as a capitalism-free-zone – that original Internet, Internet 1.0 if you want, was privatised by the emergent Big Tech.

Who paid for the trillions it cost to manufacture and to accumulate cloud capital so quickly in the hands of so very few cloudalists? The startling answer is: The G7 countries’ central banks, mostly! How did that happen? Well, by accident, or – to be more precise – by… crisis!

After the financial sector collapse of 2008, our central bankers printed up to $35 trillion to bail out the bankers at a time when the governments were subjecting our peoples to harsh austerity. Capitalists were clever enough to foresee that the many would be too impecunious to buy their stuff. So, instead of investing, they took the central bank money to the stock exchange and the bond markets, where they bought shares, bonds – along with yachts, art, bitcoin, NFTs any ‘asset’ they could lay their hands on. The only capitalists who actually invested in capital were Big Tech owners. For example, 9 out of every 10 dollars that went into creating Facebook came from these central bank monies! That’s how cloud capital was financed and how the cloudalists became our new ruling class.

As a result, real power today resides not with the owners of machinery, buildings, railway and phone networks, industrial robots. These old-fashioned, terrestrial capitalists continue to extract surplus value from waged labour, but they are no longer in charge, as they used to be. They have become vassals in relation to the owners of cloud capital, of the cloudalists. As for the rest of us, we have returned to our former status as serfs, contributing to the wealth and power of the new ruling class with our unpaid labour — in addition to the waged labour we perform, when we get the chance to do it.

But surely, someone will say, this is still capitalism, isn’t it?

So, you are still unconvinced? I know, it is hard to part with the term, with the word, capitalism. It is not just liberals who think of capitalism like fish think of the water they swim in – as natural. Socialists too need to feel that our purpose in life, the reason we landed on this Earth, is to overthrow capitalism. The news that I bring that capital beat us to it, and now we have something worse in capitalism’s place, that news is hard to accept. Indeed, it is mostly my fellow-travelling leftist friends who try to dissuade me – to convince me that, yes, cloud capital may be important but “this is still capitalism mate”.

Let’s call it rentier capitalism or monopoly capitalism, they suggest. But that simply will not do! Cloud rent is not like ground rent, because it requires massive investment in new tech. And it is not monopoly rent either, because Bezos and Zuckerberg, instead of monopolising markets to sell their manufactures (like Ford and Eddison did), Bezos and Zuckerberg have replaced markets and have no interest in manufacturing anything (unlike Henry Ford and Thomas Eddison).

How about surveillance capitalism? Again, no, it won’t do. Cloudalists do not simply use algorithms to brain wash us on behalf of advertisers in an otherwise capitalist setting. No, cloud capital reproduces itself through our free-labour, it directly exploits waged labour, and it squeezes cloud rents from vassal capitalists in trading platforms that are not markets. This is not capitalism folks! Any kind of capitalism.

But what about the observation that technofeudalism is parasitic on the capitalist sector within it? Yes, it is true. Were the conventional capitalists to die out, cloudalists would perish, unable to skim off cloud rents from the manufacturers. So what? After capitalism overthrew feudalism, capitalists were also parasitic on landowners, in the sense that, without private land producing food, capitalism would wither. Similarly, now: While the traditional capitalist sector feeds technofeudalism, it is cloud capital and cloud rent that dominate.

Does it matter whether we call it technofeudalism or some form of capitalism?

At this point, it is important to recall Marx’s maxim that the point is not to interpret but to change the world. So, does it matter if this is still capitalism or whether we call it technofeudalism? I think it does.

Recognising that our world has become technofeudal helps us grasp the enormity of what it will take to organise the victims of exorbitant power, the exploited who, now, include not only waged labourers but also the hordes of cloud serfs who are reproducing the very cloud capital that keeps them in a state of deepening precarity.

The concept of technofeudalism drives home the point that organising auto-workers and nurses, while still essential, is insufficient. It elucidates what it will take to organise the movements against the fossil fuel cartel when our means of communication are run on cloud capital primed to poison public opinion. It explains how the shift to electric cars caused German deindustrialisation, as profits due to precision mechanical engineering are being replaced by rents extracted by owners of the cloud capital keeping tabs on the drivers’ routes and in-cabin habits. Elon Musk’s decision to buy Twitter suddenly makes a lot more sense. Twitter for Musk is an interface between his mechanical capital stock at Tesla and SpaceX and cloud capital. The New Cold War between the USA and China, especially after the war in Ukraine, is explained as the repercussion of an underlying clash between two technofeudalisms, one whose cloud rents are denominated in dollars the other in yuan.

Isn’t it mindboggling? It took mind-bending scientific breakthroughs, fantastical neural networks, and imagination-defying AI programs to accomplish what? To create a world where, while privatisation and private equity asset-strip all physical wealth around us, cloud capital goes about the business of asset-stripping our brains. To own our minds individually, we must own cloud capital collectively. Once we have reclaimed our minds, we can put them collectively to work out a way to create a new cloud capital commons. It will be damned hard. But it’s the only way we can turn our cloud-based artefacts from a produced means of behaviour modification to a produced means of human collaboration and emancipation.

Cloud serfs, cloud proles and cloud vassals of the world, unite! We have nothing to lose but our mind-cloud chains!

US Edition: https://t.co/W3myKAfRMz
UK Edition: https://t.co/86CJyJL2CX
Greek Edition: https://t.co/4w64r7Mmse

[Yanis Varoufakis @yanisvaroufakis]

Thrilled to see this - especially in view of having lived for 3 glorious years in Austin, TX

[Books By Your Bedside @ByYourBedside]

Thank you @NikkiTGriffiths @melvillehouse for my copy of The Future of The Self by @joannanadin

As part of their FUTURES series, this explores our current understanding of self in both philosophical & neuroscientific terms, & through the lens of popular culture.

Out 4th July

[Nikki Griffiths @NikkiTGriffiths]

Who wants a review copy of a stunning & moving memoir?

The Dead are Gods by @Eirinieee is an exploration of grief, Blackness and female friendship. It's gorgeous!

Publishing in April: please get in touch if interested.

#booktwt #BookTwitter #bookbloggers #blogtour

[Steve Mitchelmore @Twitchelmore]

Kafka included a full stop in his signature. It signifies a certain psychological pathology, apparently.

[Melville House @melvillehouse]

Lots of publishers are saying they're going to publish the Jan 6th report ... but as @AndrewLimbong reports for @npr @NPRWeekend @nprbooks only one of them admits they have no idea if the report is going to be publishable. Guess who? @mobylives
https://t.co/ZJ2p7ZD8JP

[Mahendra Singh @mahendra_snark]

May I suggest that bookstores stock their philosophy shelves with The Hunting of the Snark GN from @melvillehouse, the book is chock full of philosophical circus folk such as Heidegger, Marx and Nietzsche, but MUCH MORE FUN.
https://t.co/mjFDK5JZxL

[Sally Hayden @sallyhayd]

Wow. This award (like the others) is dedicated to my sources in North Africa & elsewhere who are the reason this book & this collection of evidence exists. So grateful for the recognition.

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

@Ashley53B Should I investigate?

[Nikki Griffiths @NikkiTGriffiths]

Review copy alert!

Hanging Out is coming in January & it's about needing to hang out with people more in real life and be less productive, for our own wellbeing and for cultural vitality. A perfect New Year read.

Who might like a proof copy?
#bookbloggers #BookReview #booktwt

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

@BlogsofWar Bon voyage, John. Will be following you soon as I figure out Mastodon!

[Nikki Griffiths @NikkiTGriffiths]

Thanks so much to everyone who's taken part in The Poison Machine #BlogTour so far for your thoughtful reviews
@Bookliterat @swirlandthread @Wendyreadsbook1 @Lindahill50Hill @DeeCee334 @JoGarrick3 @shelfofunread @travels_along @MaliceAfore @fam_book_club

More to come next week!

[Susie Dent @susie_dent]

Word of the day is 'sequacity' (17th century): the readiness to follow a person or cause without applying any independent judgement.

[Shane Burley בד @shane_burley1]

Excited to announce Safety Through Solidarity, written with my friend @BenLorber8 and to be published w/ @melvillehouse, that looks at the fight against #antisemitism from an intersectional lens. The only way to confront it is to take on all forms of oppression together.

[Lore Sjöberg @loresjoberg]

Gonna start a band called The Foo just to see if Dave Grohl is all talk.

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

@jinwoochong @melvillehouse @PublishersWkly @SterlingLordLit Kudos, Jinwoo!

[Susie Dent @susie_dent]

Word of the day is 'overmused' (17th century): wearied by too much thinking.

[21st Century City @urbanthoughts11]

“A developed country is not a place where the poor have cars. It’s where the rich use public transportation.”

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

… and great to find indies so well represented. I was delighted to find another book I’ve been looking Fluor from the mighty @coachhousebooks!

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

Three of the greatest indie bookstores in America happen to be in my neighborhood, and the missus and me had a great time visiting all three this weekend, starting with me getting a book I’ve long meant to read at @greenlightbklyn

[Dennis Johnson @MobyLives]

Final stop: @Center4Fiction, where it was great to see @melvillehouse titles on display …