mole

Hate this society that all these covid fanatics and politicians of all parties have created one of division and hatred sorry to sound bitter

[Catherine Arthur @CatArthurian]

My stepbrother is currently camping, after losing his home in London. He doesn't have any equipment, but had to buy a cheap tent as sleeping on the beach is pretty rough.
He's gone down to the south coast, where he grew up, to be near and support his father whose health is suffering now he's in his 80s.
He's out of work, so no way to get a flat because you need 30 x the rent as yearly salary to get into private rented accommodation.
Wealden District Council are not interested in helping him find a home.
Eastbourne Borough Council are not interested in helping him, either.
If he had arrived on a boat, he'd be sleeping in a hotel by now, and being given three meals a day and free wifi for his brand new phone.
Something's broken, isn't it?

[mole @mole47458716]

@Sofia50020Sofia @DavidHawker17 1493

[mole @mole47458716]

@Sofia50020Sofia @DavidHawker17 1464

[mole @mole47458716]

@ClareCraigPath @HL38184227 Plus in cereals no indication of how much

[mole @mole47458716]

@ClareCraigPath @HL38184227 If you look at immunace from vitabiotics it already has the recommended amount of 400 mg in 1 tablet
Government policy is a shambles
According to their own figures you cannot even have bread quite apart from all other substances which have folic acid added

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

‼️ Labour says it will “reindustrialise” Britain through data centres… That is a lie!

In the UK, data centres are a fake market! government backed digital surveillance and data infrastructure that will be used to monitor and control citizens’ behaviour.

Even if you think that’s a “conspiracy theory”, look at what is actually happening.

Let’s do the maths on data centres.

Britain has some of the highest electricity prices in the developed world. Households are paying about 25p–26p per kWh under the Ofgem price cap, plus standing charges, while small businesses, farmers and manufacturers are being crushed by energy costs.

Meanwhile, the government is creating special conditions for data centres. Did you know they can receive:

▪️cheaper electricity - potentially worth up to £80 MILLION a year for the largest sites
▪️priority and accelerated grid access - while homes and businesses wait
▪️planning support - including on agricultural and green-belt land
▪️Critical National Infrastructure status, meaning in an energy shortage they will have priority.
▪️Climate Change Levy discounts of up to 92% - even though they generate huge emissions and require vast energy and water.
▪️possible public financing and state-backed infrastructure

After construction, data centres provide few permanent local jobs, and many of those can be outsourced or carried out remotely. There is little benefit to local communities.

We pay higher electricity prices to help fund the architecture of our own control.

We fund the grid. We provide the data. Then private technology giants use that infrastructure to collect, store, process and monetise our lives.

Our health data, financial data, movements, habits, faces, voices, opinions and behaviour all become part of the new profit machine. And it is all enabled and guaranteed by us.

BRILLIANT… for technology companies and governments. For us? Er … not so much.

And when you finally reach peak fury, it will already be too late.

Read my book.

[Baba Banaras™ @RealBababanaras]

Iranian girl Fatemeh whose video got viral when she riped off her hijab during January protest & demanding the freedom, equality & dignity for Iranian women has been executed by Islamic regime.

Leftist media will not cover this news, you need to tell the world. 💔

[Samantha Carson 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧 @misscarsonn]

My disabled child was handed this Pride Activity Booklet 2026 while we were waiting for his appointment at Alder Hey today.

It’s full of wording such as “lesbian”, “gay”, “bisexual”, “trans”, “non binary” etc, colouring pages saying “Some kids have two mums” and “Some kids have two dads”, rainbows, “Equality Wins” pictures, and stickers from Alder Hey Children’s Charity covered in pride flags.

When we came back down after the appointment they have a full set-up in the middle of the hospital with speeches going on about LGBTQ+.

I bring my child here so he can see his doctors and get the medical care he needs, not so that adults can push gender and LGBTQ+ ideology on an impressionable disabled child in a hospital waiting room.

This is a children’s hospital. Something has gone badly wrong when this is treated as normal.

I do have a video of me making a complaint. The gentleman said “I’m so sorry, it’s nothing to do with us.” I genuinely felt sorry for him, so I will not post it.

So whose decision is it? The Trust, the charity, or higher up in the NHS and government?

[Fatima Aslam 🌸 @WoundedTiger__]

Just finished two weeks as an ex-Muslim and finally ripped the hijab. My parents and the whole mosque are already blowing up my phone with calls trying to drag me back. I'm first in my bloodline to escape this mental prison. I’m free now and never going back.
#exmuslim

[Gill Gentles @gillygen]

I’d never to think to look for it there! @tonyaddison @ClareCraigPath
Please sign petition and share! Thank you 🙏
I honestly believe this is not good for health!

[Jack @FFS_WhatNow]

She soon changed her tune.

[wilma ⚖️🥂 @furbabygirl]

There’s always a tweet.

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

In 90s NHS created a private intranet which became a dedicated national broadband network in 2004-2006.

All to ensure patient confidentiality.

In 2026, your health records are going to be forced to be compatible with every other country's.

Why?
&
What could go wrong?

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

The new Government should axe its plans for an Islamophobia tsar and abandon the official definition of “anti-Muslim hostility”.

The Starmer Government effectively reintroduced Britain’s blasphemy laws — for Islam alone — via the back door, 18 years after Parliament voted to abolish them.

Since the introduction of this de facto Islamic blasphemy law, we have seen Labour MPs and public bodies, such as South Wales Police, weaponise the definition to silence legitimate criticism of Islam, its history and its practices.

In a free country, no religion should be put on a pedestal or afforded greater protection than others. Nor should any religion be shielded from legitimate challenge and debate.

The definition also risks fuelling community tensions, leading to an increase in genuine incidents of anti-Muslim hostility.

Far from tackling genuine hatred, this definition risks undermining that very objective.

[Bernie @Artemisfornow]

Brilliant! Norway’s state controlled energy company which has reported $11.5 BILLION in earnings in 3 months.

Thats the kind of wealth Mad Ed decided Britain shouldn’t bother with.

And £ Billions more in lost production, jobs, tax revenue and energy security.

That money could have helped fund defence instead of enriching another country. Shh …. We’re saving the planet though 🤡

[English Gentleman 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇺🇸 @EngGentleman7]

The Curious Case of the Honourable Member for Sheffield Heeley
Or: How a Woman of Apparent Principle Came to Sit at the Very Heart of Government

There are few sights more calculated to warm the progressive heart than the rapid ascent of Louise Haigh.

Young, articulate, northern, and possessed of that particular brand of moral certainty that Labour has long mistaken for statesmanship, she was, until recently, held up as the very model of the modern politician. Transport Secretary at thirty-seven, the youngest woman ever to sit in Cabinet, architect of the great rail renationalisation, scourge of rogue ferry operators, and tireless champion of the working man. One could almost hear the violins.

Alas, the melody has rather soured.

Miss Haigh’s early curriculum vitae is not without its ironies. Privately educated at Sheffield High School for Girls — an institution whose fees would make the average trade-unionist blanch — she later found herself working as a public policy manager at Aviva, that pillar of the insurance establishment.

Between 2009 and 2011 she even served as a Special Constable with the Metropolitan Police, complete with full powers of arrest. One rather suspects the apple did not fall far from a particular tree: the granddaughter and niece of trade-union officials who somehow managed to combine private education, corporate employment, and a brief flirtation with the thin blue line before discovering the more lucrative pastures of parliamentary socialism.

It is the episode of 2013, however, that rewards closer inspection.

While employed by Aviva, Miss Haigh reported that her work-issued BlackBerry had been stolen during a mugging on a night out. A new telephone — an iPhone 5, no less — was duly issued. Some time later the original device was discovered, still in her possession. She neglected to inform either her employer or the police. When the handset was eventually switched on, the signal alerted the authorities. Aviva, which had already investigated more than one instance of missing telephones connected with the same employee, referred the matter to the Crown Prosecution Service.

In November 2014 — a mere six months before her election to the House of Commons — Miss Haigh appeared at Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court and pleaded guilty to fraud by false representation. The court record is unambiguous: she had “dishonestly made a false representation, namely that [her] work-issued mobile phone had been stolen, intending to cause loss to Aviva…causing them to issue [her] with a new iPhone 5 instead of a replacement BlackBerry.”

The cost to the company, investigation included, was put at £1,249.

She received a conditional discharge. One notes the elegant understatement of the sentence. One notes also that a former Special Constable had chosen to mislead the police for the sake of a superior telephone.

This was not, as the subsequent public relations effort would have it, a “genuine mistake from which I did not make any gain.” The gain was listed on the charge sheet. The dishonesty was admitted under oath. And yet the matter was somehow deemed insufficiently serious to prevent her selection as a parliamentary candidate, her rapid promotion through the shadow ranks under both Mr Corbyn and Sir Keir Starmer, or her eventual elevation to the Cabinet. Starmer’s team, we are told, knew of the conviction. They appointed her anyway. How very modern.

As Transport Secretary she wasted little time in demonstrating the same impatience with inconvenient facts. In October 2024, while still a serving minister, she publicly urged the British people to boycott P&O Ferries — a company whose parent was due to attend a government investment summit the following week.

The Prime Minister was obliged to disown her remarks within hours. One does not lightly accuse a Cabinet minister of freelancing foreign and industrial policy on live television, yet the record speaks for itself.

And now, in the summer of 2026, the wheel has turned full circle. With the arrival of Mr Andy Burnham in Downing Street, Miss Haigh has been restored to the highest counsels of state: First Secretary of State, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, and Minister for the Cabinet Office.

In plain English, she is the Prime Minister’s principal lieutenant, charged with running the engine room of government. The woman who once lied to the police and her employer in order to obtain a newer telephone now sits at the centre of power, shaping policy for the entire nation.

One is left with a simple, rather uncomfortable observation. In any ordinary walk of life — banking, the law, the police service she once briefly joined — a conviction for fraud by false representation would have closed doors permanently.

In the higher reaches of the Labour Party it appears to function as little more than an interesting biographical footnote, swiftly forgotten once the correct factional winds begin to blow.

The British public, one suspects, may prove less forgetful. They have been asked to trust a government that places a convicted fraudster at its very heart and then invites them to believe that standards have never been higher. It is a curious request. One rather wonders how long the public will continue to oblige.

Yours in quiet astonishment,
A Gentleman from the Old School

#LouiseHaigh #Labour #Burnham

[mole @mole47458716]

@VividProwess @denpapwp123 And ask them why male Muslims are allowed to bear their naked torso’s yet their women are expected to be forced to cover everything
Leave you to draw your own conclusions

[mole @mole47458716]

@VividProwess @denpapwp123 Just remind them who defeated who in the Holy Crusades

[mole @mole47458716]

@Neccccy @GillJames54 Well he is not a Freemason