Palestinian students in UNRWA schools:
"With Allah's help we will return and those Jews, who are dogs, we will smash their heads. I want to be a jihadist, and to kill Jews for Allah and become a martyr.
Be honest: does anyone believe peace can be made with these people?
#Nieuwsuur#Pauwendewit
Deze Wethouder van Maasluis mag nu al een lintje hebben.
Niet meewerken aan de #Spreidingswet
"Volgens de wet moeten wij een aanbod doen, en ons aanbod is 0"
Goed zo! Terug duwen, voorbeeld stellen voor andere gemeenten.
,,Linkse, kerkelijke of humanitaire organisaties zijn sinds 7 oktober 2023 erg tegen Israël. Maar daardoor zijn ze niet kritisch genoeg op terreurorganisaties, dat leidt al gauw tot steun daaraan.’’
-
https://t.co/QqmLdY7Bdy
This real-time 1948 article from The Economist completely destroys the modern “Nakba” narrative that was invented decades later as political propaganda.
Straight from British eyewitnesses in Haifa, October 2, 1948:
“Jewish authorities urged all Arabs to remain in Haifa and guaranteed them protection and security ... However, of the 62,000 Arabs who formerly lived in Haifa, not more than 5,000 or 6,000 remained.
The most potent factor was the announcements made over the air by the Arab Higher Executive, urging the Arabs to quit ... those who remained and accepted Jewish protection would be regarded as renegades.”
They didn’t flee because of “Zionist ethnic cleansing.”
They fled because Arab leaders ordered them to get out of the way so their armies could “drive the Jews into the sea.”
Then they lost the war they started — and spent the next 77 years rewriting history to blame the Jews.
The “Nakba” you were taught? Pure revisionist fiction.
This sign is located by the entrance of every Arab village in Judea and Samaria.
Now imagine for a second that instead of the word Israelis, it said that it’s dangerous for women to go past this line. Or blacks. Or Muslims.
Imagine Israel had that sign by the entrance of every Israeli city or town.
Can you even imagine such a sign and how quickly the world would lose it?
Israel is an apartheid? THIS is apartheid! Jews not allowed past this point?
Tuurlijk, @NadiaMoussaid! Zéker gaan wij de Nakba onderwijzen.
Dan vertellen we hoe vijf Arabische legers in 1948 Israël binnenvielen om alle Joden de zee in te drijven.
Dan leggen we uit dat de Arabische leiders hun eigen mensen opriepen om snel te vertrekken uit Israël, zodat ‘het Joodse vraagstuk’ ongehinderd opgelost kon worden.
Dan behandelen we de rol van de grootmoefti, die in Berlijn thee dronk met Hitler, moslim-SS-divisies oprichtte en die een ‘Judenrein’ Midden-Oosten ambieerde.
Dan vertellen we erbij dat die vijf Arabische legers dus duidelijk van plan waren om Hitlers ‘final solution’ alsnog af te ronden.
Dan leren we de kinderen dat er 800.000 Joden uit islamitische landen zijn gejaagd - hun huizen, bedrijven, synagogen: álles lieten ze gedwongen achter.
Dan leggen we uit dat Israël vervolgens ál deze vluchtelingen opving. En dat allemaal zónder steun van UNRWA, en zónder een decennia durende lucratieve slachtoffer-industrie.
En dan sluiten we af met de enige juiste conclusie:
de Nakba was géén koloniale catastrofe, maar een mislukt islamofascistisch genocidaal plan.
Dus ja, onderwijs over de Nakba is inderdaad keihard nodig. Sinds 7 oktober zien we dit iedere dag opnieuw.
Vandaag herdachten Femke Halsema, @ahmedmarcouch en Sharon Dijksma een genocidaal plan om Joden, drie jaar na de Shoa, de zee in te drijven.
Tegen alle verwachtingen in, en met veel slachtoffers aan beide zijden, mislukte dat plan.
Naar goed Joods gebruik: They tried to kill us, they failed, let’s eat (and watch #Eurovision).
Prettige avond.
Opiniemaker @umarebru vindt dat #Kanye#West niet zou moeten kunnen optreden in #Nederland door zijn antisemitische uitspraken en liedjes. @marcelvink888: 'Kanye heeft zich antisemitisch uitgelaten.' @wierdduk reageert op wat BN'ers hierop te zeggen hebben. #nieuwsvandedag
"A study reveals that energy contributions from wind farms begin to fall sharply after only 10 to 15 years, leaving the skeletons of steel and plastic blowing in the wind."
Many of the onshore wind farms along the coasts of the UK and Denmark are falling apart after only 10 years.
A study reveals that energy contributions from wind farms begin to fall sharply after only 10 to 15 years, leaving the skeletons of steel and plastic blowing in the wind.
The economic analysis reveals the lifespan of an onshore turbine is not 20 to 25 years, as stated by the wind industry itself, supported by the UK Government.
This peer reviewed British study reveals that the energy production of onshore wind farms falls substantially as they get older, due to wear and tear. Energy and environmental economist, Professor Gordon Hughes (University of Edinburgh), carried out the statistical analysis of wind farm performance data in the UK and Denmark.
He concluded that load factors, like electricity generated as a percentage of capacity, declined a lot faster than expected, suggesting a baseline 10 to 15 year lifespan. This is when the technical life of most turbines crunch to halt, and become unprofitable to continue. Rising maintenance costs makes them uneconomical.
The study found the average UK wind farm's ability to meet electricity demand had fallen by a third after around 10 years, leading to a conclusion that many are fully uneconomic to run after only 12 years.
While the wind industry generally forecasts a 25-year lifespan, the data reveals a different reality about the viability of keeping them spinning so long. Many companies now 'repower' (replace old turbines with new ones) long before the 25-year target to maximise subsidies and output. This often ends the lifespan of the original hardware much sooner.
The wind farm study is published by the 'Renewable Energy Foundation on the Performance of Wind Farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark, 2012'.
Tekst van de dag. Hoe toepasselijk in deze tijd.
-
Spreuken 13:20 BB
[20] Als je met wijze mensen omgaat, word je wijs. Maar als je bevriend bent met dwazen, loopt het slecht met je af.
https://t.co/88AOPUe1al