Cips.

[1tokki @juantokki]

ADOR can’t bring this girl down. 💪

[NewJeans Loops @newjeans_loop]

260704

#다니엘 #Danielle

[Cips. @moonwakes]

wtb vidio

#zonaba #zonauang #zonajajan

[England @England]

Together 👊

[Football Away Days @FBAwayDays]

What an incredible clip… 😍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[1tokki @juantokki]

So… Which Is It, ADOR?

One of many things that’s been bothering me about ADOR’s recent claims is that they can’t seem to keep their own story straight.

Back in April 2025, during the hearing of the exclusive contract validity lawsuit, ADOR made a very clear argument.

They told the court that NewJeans had successfully performed at ComplexCon Hong Kong without Min Hee-jin’s involvement, and that this proved she wasn’t indispensable.

In ADOR’s own words:

“The successful outcome of that performance suggests that Min is not the only one capable of producing for the group.”

The message couldn’t have been clearer. They are trying to frame that NewJeans did fine without Min.

That was their narrative that time.

Fast forward to July 2026, and suddenly we’re hearing something completely different.

Now the claim is that Min Hee-jin was actually behind almost everything.

According to reports summarizing ADOR’s court presentation, MHJ allegedly planned the ComplexCon performance, oversaw the NJZ profile shoot, directed the styling, participated in recording the new song, coordinated with organizers, and even stressed strict confidentiality throughout the preparations.

So… which is it?

Because those two stories don’t fit together.

If Min really directed all of those creative decisions, then why did ADOR spend 2025 arguing that ComplexCon proved NewJeans could succeed without her?

And if the April 2025 statement was true… that the performance was prepared without MHJ’s involvement… then why is ADOR now presenting her as the mastermind behind the entire project?

You can’t have it both ways.

This isn’t about whether MHJ actually participated. That’s ultimately something the court will determine based on evidence.

This is about ADOR’s messaging.

Notice how the story changes depending on what benefits them at the time. To me, that’s a really clear indication that they are lying.

When they wanted to argue that NewJeans didn’t need MHJ, she was suddenly irrelevant.

When they wanted to argue that she orchestrated unauthorized activities, she suddenly became involved in everything.

No consistency. That’s just some vile cold-hearted strategy.

And people who use their brains should have noticed that by now.

In any legal dispute, parties are naturally going to make arguments that favor their position. That’s expected. But credibility matters. Good faith matters. When your public narrative flips depending on what’s convenient, it raises a simple question: Are the facts changing? Or is the story changing?

That’s why I think it’s important not to get swept up in every headline. Instead, look at the timeline. Look at what was said before. Look at what’s being said now.

Sometimes the biggest contradiction isn’t what your opponent says. It’s what you said yourself a year earlier.

[1tokki @juantokki]

250trossa:
https://t.co/rzcZyGE1Z8

A few days ago, another hearing took place in the lawsuit between Danielle and ADOR. Once again, we are witnessing a one-sided media campaign unfold. Many people are already aware of this, but from this point forward, what matters is not just the details of the hearing itself, but remembering the pattern that HYBE and ADOR have repeatedly shown.

First, a court hearing takes place.

Second, inside the courtroom, HYBE and ADOR’s lawyers do not merely argue points of law. They also present language and framing that seem designed with public opinion outside the courtroom in mind.

Third, media outlets friendly to HYBE and ADOR begin shaping public opinion through sensational headlines and provocative wording.

Fourth, HYBE’s PR network, viral accounts that appear to have received materials from them, coordinated commenters, and SNS accounts flood the internet with inflammatory memes and isolated excerpts, overwhelming public discourse.

Fifth, after the hearing, Lee Jin-ho and Dispatch release broadcasts and articles that push almost identical narratives. They claim to have conducted their own reporting, but it raises serious questions how their coverage ends up being so remarkably similar. It is far more convincing to conclude that they were both provided with the same information by a common source.

This repetition does not appear to be a coincidence. Rather, it resembles the typical pattern of media warfare that HYBE and ADOR have repeatedly employed whenever they find themselves in situations that are unfavorable or difficult to defend.

The same pattern is repeating itself in Danielle’s case. ADOR filed a damages lawsuit seeking approximately KRW 43.1 billion against Danielle, Danielle’s mother, and former CEO Min Hee-jin, and later asked the court to reduce the amount claimed to approximately KRW 33.1 billion. A lawsuit of this magnitude should fundamentally be about evidence and legal arguments—not media play. Yet every time a hearing is held, sensational articles and carefully edited narratives begin spreading outside the courtroom before anything else. This resembles less a normal legal dispute than a culture-industry style crisis management strategy aimed at controlling public perception before the court reaches its conclusions.

What is especially telling is the repeated overlap between the narratives promoted by Lee Jin-ho and Dispatch. Before this hearing even took place, several developments deserved substantial media attention: the entire legal team from Kim & Chang, which had represented ADOR, resigned; ADOR appeared to delay proceedings without presenting key evidence; and ADOR itself filed a request to reduce the amount of damages it was seeking. From a litigation strategy standpoint, these were highly significant developments and unquestionably newsworthy.

Yet they remained silent.

Had the exact same events occurred on Danielle’s side or on former CEO Min Hee-jin’s side, would they have remained this quiet?

Almost certainly not.

Instead, it appears that, in an effort to offset the growing accumulation of questionable conduct and unfavorable public opinion surrounding HYBE and ADOR, they spent considerably more time than before meticulously preparing another media campaign ahead of this hearing.

Looking at what they have chosen to amplify over the past several months—and what they have deliberately ignored—sends a very clear message in itself. They remain completely silent regarding strategic developments unfavorable to HYBE and ADOR, such as the failure to present evidence, the replacement of legal counsel, or the reduction of damages sought. Yet whenever an opportunity arises to attack Danielle or former CEO Min Hee-jin or cast them in a negative light, they almost simultaneously amplify nearly identical narratives, suddenly flooding the public with articles and content.

That is precisely why calling Lee Jin-ho and Dispatch “the press” in the first place is absurd. They are not journalists holding power accountable. They are merchants who profit from turning other people’s private lives and suffering into sensational content, serving as nothing more than private loudspeakers that move in lockstep with HYBE and ADOR’s interests.

Repeatedly amplifying narratives designed to impose the logic of capital on the public while attacking a chosen target is neither fair reporting nor legitimate criticism. Their conduct therefore deserves serious scrutiny and criticism.

More than anything, the continued repetition of such transparent and contrived media manipulation does nothing to resolve the underlying issues. Instead, it only deepens public exhaustion and accelerates the loss of momentum across the company and the industry as a whole. Increasingly, people are asking the obvious question: Is this genuinely normal journalism, or is it merely a deceptive public relations campaign parroting narratives carefully constructed by powerful organizations with financial interests?

From what I have heard regarding the hearing a few days ago, ADOR’s lawyers once again relied on arguments that came across as little more than wordplay, and the atmosphere suggested those arguments were not easily persuasive to the judges. Of course, until the court reaches its final decision, no one’s claims can be treated as established fact. However, looking at the overall pattern so far, it is difficult to deny that HYBE and ADOR appear far more accustomed to influencing public emotions outside the courtroom than persuading judges inside it through clear evidence and sound legal reasoning.

The same pattern will likely continue throughout the upcoming hearings. A hearing will be held. Sensational articles will appear. YouTube videos will be uploaded. Edited clips and emotionally charged captions will spread across social media. HYBE and ADOR will likely continue trying to solve everything with the power and resources they possess.

But I do not believe things will unfold according to their wishes. We have already seen a consistent pattern emerge through the previous proceedings, and the public has now witnessed the same cycle repeated over and over again. Once may be coincidence. Twice may be strategy. But when the same thing keeps happening, it becomes a system.

For those watching this unfold, the task is simple. Do not be swayed by sensational headlines. Do not accept the narratives that suddenly flood the media before and after each hearing at face value. When Lee Jin-ho and Dispatch begin pushing the same narrative at the same time, ask yourself who benefits from it. And above all, keep watching to see what is actually proven in court.

If HYBE and ADOR are truly confident in their position, then they should speak through evidence—not media campaigns. They should explain themselves in court, not through journalists. They should prove that their actions were justified instead of placing pressure on artists. Yet everything they have shown so far points in the opposite direction. They appear more focused on shaping public opinion before the court reaches its judgment, prioritizing narratives over evidence, and using the name of a contract to relentlessly corner an individual’s life.

There is one thing I have come to believe through my own life experiences: in the end, the world follows its natural order. Those who commit wrongdoing eventually face its consequences. We simply do not know when that moment will come or what form it will take. But those who torment others, try to destroy another person’s life, or use their power to silence someone will, sooner or later, pay the price.

In Chapter 73 of the Tao Te Ching, there is a famous saying: “The net of Heaven is vast; though its mesh is wide, nothing escapes it.” It means that evil deeds and wrongdoing may appear to evade justice for a time, but in the end, nothing escapes accountability.

In the English-speaking world, there is an old saying believed to have originated from ancient Greek thought: “The mills of God grind slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine.” It means that although divine justice may seem slow, it is ultimately precise and inescapable.

The Bible likewise says, “A man reaps what he sows,” warning that no one can escape responsibility for their actions. James 5:1–6 also speaks clearly of the judgment awaiting those who use wealth and power to oppress the vulnerable and deprive them of what is rightfully theirs.

In the end, it is only a matter of time. The natural order may seem slow, but it always arrives. And when that day comes, it will become much clearer who tormented whom, who tried to destroy another person’s life, who sought to shape public opinion before allowing the law to speak, and how every part of this process unfolded.

[ᵔ- ˕ -ᵔ₎ @kminjiluvr]

Often imitated, never duplicated

[ElBuni @therealbuni]

Noruega elimino a brasil y el ejercito subió un video haciendo el festejo vikingo

[Geronimo Morgans @GeronimoMorgans]

Dear Norway fans… you are, without question, the finest supporters this tournament has seen.

From a nation of just over five and a half million people, you travelled across oceans, filled stadiums, painted American streets red and white and turned every single game into a festival of noise, pride and pure joy.

28 years away from the World Cup stage and you returned not with entitlement, but with energy. Not just with noise, but with meaning.

The Viking Row didn’t just inspire your players. It inspired everyone. Opponents. Neutrals. The entire watching world.

The quarter finals. You deserve every single second of it. Keep going. Keep rowing. Norway, the world is behind you. 🇳🇴

[Sudanalytics @sudanalytics_]

🤯🇳🇴 ASÍ SE GRITÓ EN NORUEGA EL GOL DE HAALAND PARA ELIMINAR A BRASIL.

MIRÁ LO QUE ES ESTO. 🚬

[Sudanalytics @sudanalytics_]

🤯🇳🇴 ASÍ SE FESTEJA AHORA EN NORUEGA.

LOCURA TOTAL, LA COPA DEL MUNDO. 🍿

[팀 버니즈 @NewJeansSTRM]

📌 7월 2일 변론기일 관련 다니엘 법률대리인 화우에 문의하여 받은 공식 입장입니다.

○ 2026. 7. 2. 진행된 다니엘 재판 직후, 일부 언론이 중국 자본을 거론하며 다니엘이 외부 회사와 이중계약을 체결하거나 이를 은폐한 것처럼 왜곡하여 보도하였음

○ 해당 사안은 2025년 뉴진스 분쟁 당시 제3자가 하이브 측에 공식적인 방법으로 어도어 지분매각 제안서를 전달한 정상적인 과정을 허위사실을 섞어 악의적으로 왜곡시킨 것으로, 다니엘을 포함한 뉴진스 멤버들은 특정 회사와 연예전속계약을 이중으로 체결하거나 체결하려 한 사실이 없음

○ 위 보도내용을 포함하여 당일 어도어 측 변호인의 주장들은 객관적인 사실과 차이가 있거나 사실관계를 왜곡, 과장한 것들임

○ 다니엘 변호인단은 본건 사실관계가 왜곡, 확산되고 특히 뉴진스 전체 멤버들과 관련한 사안이 마치 다니엘 개인의 독자 행동인 것처럼 보도되는 과정에 어도어 측의 영향력이 개입된 것이 아닌지 의심하고 있음

○ 어도어 측의 주장 취지는 전혀 새로운 것이 아니며 최종적으로 법원이 증거에 기초해 정확한 법률 판단을 할 것으로 기대함

○ 다니엘 변호인단은 어도어 측이 여론을 통해 재판에 부당한 영향을 미치려는 움직임에 대해서는 단호히 대처하도록 재판부에 필요한 조치를 요청할 계획임

2026.7.6
법무법인(유) 화우 다니엘 변호인단

[NewJeans Loops @newjeans_loop]

260704

#다니엘 #Danielle

[shine @catzrinie]

📌 Ini adalah pernyataan resmi yang diterima setelah menghubungi tim kuasa hukum Danielle dari HwaWoo terkait sidang pada 2 Juli.

• Setelah sidang Danielle pada 2 juli 2026, beberapa media memberitakan secara menyimpang dengan mengaitkan modal China sehingga seolah olah Danielle telah membuat atau menyembunyikan kontrak ganda dengan perusahaan lain.

• Menurut tim kuasa hukum, perkara tersebut sebenarnya berasal dari proses yang sah saat perselisihan Newjeans pada 2025, ketika pihak ketiga secara resmi menyampaikan proposal penjualan saham ADOR kepada HYBE. Namun, proses tersebut dipelintir secara sengaja dengan mencampurkan informasi palsu. Danielle maupun anggota Newjeans lainnya tidak pernah menandatangani ataupun mencoba menandatangani kontrak eksklusif ganda dengan perusahaan mana pun.

• Mereka juga menyatakan bahwa klaim yang disampaikan kuasa hukum ADOR pada hari sidang termasuk yang kemudian diberitakan media, berbeda dari fakta objektif atau memutarbalikkan serta melebih lebihkan fakta yang sebenarnya.

• Tim kuasa hukum Danielle menduga bahwa dalam proses penyebaran informasi yang telah dipelintir itu, terutama hingga persoalan yang melibatkan seluruh anggota NewJeans diberitakan seolah-olah merupakan tindakan pribadi Danielle mungkin ada campur tangan atau pengaruh dari pihak ADOR.

• Tim kuasa hukum menegaskan bahwa inti argumen ADOR sama sekali bukan hal yang baru dan mereka berharap pada akhirnya pengadilan akan memberikan penilaian hukum yang tepat berdasarkan bukti bukti yang diajukan.

• Selain itu, tim kuasa hukum Danielle berencana meminta majelis hakim mengambil langkah langkah yang diperlukan agar dapat menindak tegas setiap upaya ADOR untuk memengaruhi jalannya persidangan melalui pembentukan opini publik.

6 Juli 2026
HwaWoo LLC
Tim kuasa hukum Danielle

[1tokki @juantokki]

Soseolhee:

We should argue based on what the article actually says:

1. The “double contract” (dual contract) narrative that they’ve been pushing, and making the main focus of their attack, is about the ComplexCon matter.

2. Their media play is claiming that after the first-instance ruling, when Danielle and her family decided to return, they “tried to deny the existence of a double contract.”

3. When they first terminated the contract and filed the lawsuit, their stated reason was that Danielle had “caused the exclusive contract dispute and bore significant responsibility for the members’ departure and the delay in their return.”

But the exclusive contract was signed collectively, and the representative of the group was Minji. That means the narrative they’re pushing now doesn’t even fit the original grounds they gave for terminating the contract.

So it seems they’ve changed their argument to: “She was the only member who engaged in independent activities, and she also showed no willingness to correct her contractual violations.”

4. The claim that “she showed no willingness to correct her contractual violations” can be easily rebutted. When Danielle’s side asked ADOR what exactly she was supposed to do to remedy the alleged breach, ADOR essentially told her to figure it out herself.

As for the one-sided claim that her attitude during questioning was inappropriate, now that she has abandoned her appeal in the exclusive contract validity case and declared that she would rejoin ADOR, it would be impossible for that to serve as legal grounds for a court to find that the relationship of trust had irreparably broken down.

5. As for the allegation that she engaged in independent commercial activities:

- ADOR accompanied her during the activity.
- There is no resulting work product (meaning no commercial activity was actually carried out). Even according to ㅇㄹㅈ own statements, there is no evidence that any collaboration actually took place.

So there’s virtually no chance the court would accept this as anything more than a one-sided allegation.

6. As for ㅇㄹㅈ, they’re claiming that the production expenses invested at ㅇㅁㅅㄴㅇㄹㅈ during that period were actually for Danielle’s project. But they have no evidence. On top of that, it’s already publicly known that those production funds were used to make music for ㅇㄹㅂㅇ (an older female singer), so the claim is honestly ridiculous.

7. Even so, they’re now arguing that Danielle might have had a private karaoke session with the ㅇㄹㅈ members, and that this constitutes a breach of contract. Yet they can’t prove that any work was ever publicly performed or commercially exploited, nor can they prove that any money changed hands. They’re basically insisting that their instruments might have been played somewhere, without any evidence. Do they seriously think a court is going to accept an argument like that?

8. In short, ADOR can’t win this case on its merits, so they’re throwing everything at the wall… trying one allegation after another in the hope that something will stick.

[토끼리 @leeetokki]

❗️화우와 세종에 두 곳 모두에 문의했습니다❗️

커뮤에 돌고있는 이중계약, 산업정보 빼돌리기 관련된 계약 위반 사항 하나부터 열까지 #맥락짜깁기한허위루머 라고 하네요

저쪽에서 지금까지 잘 하던짓 있지 않아요?
>>짜집기 소설 쓰기<<
말도 안된다고 하십니다😉
노 걱정 노 스트레스

허위라서 기사로 내면 문제될까봐 커뮤에만 돌리는 것도 짜치네요

[1tokki @juantokki]

I hope this reminds Bunnies that our circumstances don’t define us.

A lot of us have been struggling since all of this began. It’s been exhausting, and there are days when it’s hard to stay hopeful. But just like Dani, we should keep making time for the things that bring us joy. Even if progress feels slow, we have to keep inching forward. That’s how we get through difficult seasons.

Nothing changes if we let ourselves be consumed by misery. Choosing to keep living, finding reasons to smile, and embracing the people and moments that make us happy is an act of strength. Dani has shown us time and time again that she’s far stronger than most people realize. She’s a fighter, and through everything she’s endured, she has never lost the warmth and radiance that make her who she is.

Outside this social media bubble, our girls are living their lives. They take what life gives them and keep moving forward with faith, hope, and joy. And to me, that’s the greatest response they could ever give to those who have spent so much time trying to tear them down with lies. They refuse to let bitterness define them, and that’s something truly worth admiring.

민지, 하니, 다니엘, 해린, 혜인아… 파이팅! 💪🫂

[NewJeans Loops @newjeans_loop]

260704

#다니엘 #Danielle

[tequilasmom @tquilasmom]

que alegría que incluso por todo lo que ha pasado newjeans, la industria no las olvida
antes de la presentación de enrique iglesias, el DJ invitado reprodujo Super Shy de Newjeans, esto fue en el Fifa FanFest de Monterrey
Verdaderamente #newjeansneverdie