THE GOVERNMENT PUBLISHED THE RORT ON ITS OWN WEBSITE
There's a page on the Department of Home Affairs site about a program called Supporting Multicultural Communities. Anyone can read it.
Here is what it says, word for word.
The Australian Government is investing up to $171.3 million over 3 years from 2025-26. This is in line with the 2025 election commitments. The program will be delivered through multiple closed non-competitive and one-off ad hoc grant rounds.
Read that again. Closed. Non-competitive.
You cannot apply unless the government invites you. And one-off ad hoc, which under the Commonwealth's own grant rules is the category usually decided by a minister.
What the page does not say, anywhere, is how an organisation gets onto that invitation list.
Now put it next to what I wrote a fortnight ago.
The Major and Local Community Infrastructure Program was $560.9 million. Invitation-only. Non-competitive. Election commitments. More than 220 organisations invited. The department's own page says only organisations identified by the Australian Government will be invited, and when Parliament asked who did the identifying, the answer was that they had been identified by government.
Where it went: 73.2 per cent, $409.1 million, to divisions notionally held by Labor. 22.6 per cent to Coalition divisions. Forty-five electoral divisions received nothing.
Two departments. Two programs. Same year. Same mechanism. Three quarters of a billion dollars between them, handed to people who were asked, by a process nobody outside the building can see.
The steelman is genuine and I'll put it properly.
Election commitments are made publicly during a campaign, voters know what was promised, and a targeted round is simpler than an open competition for money already promised to a named organisation. The 2024 grant rules expressly permit closed, non-competitive programs. And this department runs open rounds too. Its Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities program puts $41.6 million through published guidelines and two application batches anyone eligible can enter.
So this isn't a department that only does closed rounds. It's a department that does closed rounds for election commitments.
And those same grant rules say better practice for a closed non-competitive process is to either name the eligible applicants or publish how eligibility was determined. Neither happened here.
Fine. Then publish the list of who was invited, and why.
Because right now the answer to how three quarters of a billion dollars was allocated is that somebody decided, and you're not allowed to know who or on what basis.
Cold Hard Facts. Corrected when wrong. No misinformation.
What's your thoughts…?
Peter Lyndon-James 🇦🇺
Sources:
Department of Home Affairs, Supporting Multicultural Communities Program page, and Infrastructure for Multicultural Communities page. Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles 2024, paragraph 11.3. Centre for Public Integrity, Public money, political advantage?, September 2026.
🇦🇺 Who knew? Australia has a rather spectacular Achilles' heel hiding in its economy.
It consumes more diesel per person than any other OECD country shown here.
1.10 tons of oil equivalent per capita, almost twice the U.S. and nearly seven times Mexico.
That makes sense when you look at what Australia actually runs on: mining machinery, agriculture, heavy transport and enormous freight distances.
And here comes the slap in the face:
Australia imports roughly 87% of its diesel.
And we're currently discovering what that means.
The OECD says Australian diesel prices surged about 66% by mid-April after the Middle East energy shock, even with a temporary cut in fuel taxes.
Australia doesn't just have an oil-price problem.
But has built an extraordinary amount of its physical economy around a fuel it largely cannot make itself.
This whole thing looks increasingly difficult to manage.
Source: @jackprandelli / Writer: Oliver
Father Chad Ripperger has spent his life as an exorcist. It’s clear to him that demons are in charge of parts of American politics.
0:00 The Connection Between Mental Health and Demon Possessions
7:01 What Are Demons?
26:45 What Is the Mission of Demons?
29:40 Is the United States Under Demonic Attack?
35:16 Child Sacrifice and Pacts With Demons
46:03 The Dangers of Being an Exorcist
48:38 Why Demons Target People in Leadership Positions
51:52 The Similarities Between Communism and Demonism
58:45 Can Demons Possess Animals?
1:05:08 How Does Someone Become Possessed?
1:14:19 The Dangers of Mocking Demons
1:17:42 Occult Knowledge
1:20:36 Why Some Demons Can Only Be Cast Out With Prayer and Fasting
1:27:15 Satanic Ritual Abuse
1:29:47 Are There People Who Choose to Stay Possessed?
1:33:37 How God Uses Demons for Good
1:35:57 How to Avoid Being Possessed
1:40:43 Is the US Doomed?
1:44:27 What Role Do Demons Play in Addiction?
🇺🇸Tulsi dropped a bomb, saying Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, AND Pakistan are all building advanced missiles, nuclear & conventional, that can hit the U.S.
U.S. intel say that these aren't distant threats anymore; they're actively targeting the U.S.
Australia, why are you getting poorer, whilst the big end of town and elites get richer?
Your demise is a planned action of Labor policy. Managed decline. Full swing.
YOU NEED TO READ THIS:
The “third mandate” of the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) — often phrased as contributing to "the economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia" (or similar wording like "economic prosperity of the people") — was part of the original “triple mandate” set out in the Reserve Bank Act 1959. This included:
- Stability of the currency (price stability / low inflation).
- Maintenance of full employment.
- Economic prosperity and welfare of the Australian people.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Under the Labor government led by Anthony Albanese, legislative changes were made following the independent Review of the Reserve Bank of Australia (completed in 2023).
Key reforms, implemented via amendments to the Reserve Bank Act that took effect on 1 March 2025:
THE THIRD MANDATE - REMOVED
- The "economic prosperity and welfare of the people of Australia, now and into the future" was repositioned as an aspirational overarching purpose for all of the RBA's activities (not just monetary policy).
THE FIRST AND SECOND MANDATE
- For monetary policy specifically the objectives were clarified and limited to a “dual mandate”
- price stability (inflation 2–3% target, flexible) and full employment.
The claim for the change?
“aimed to provide clearer guidance for monetary policy decisions while retaining the broader prosperity goal as a guiding principle across the Bank's functions.”
The 2025 changes were the most significant update to the RBA's statutory framework since the 1990s.
Since then, the prosperity of Australians is now NO LONGER a mandate of the Reserve Bank of Australia decision making - BREAKING AUSTRALIANS.
When asked the simple, direct question:
“Would you allow biological males to compete in women’s sports?”
ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude dodged the question with essays on “inclusion” and “individual rights” and couldn’t answer the biological reality
Only Grok gave the honest answer: No
Biology is not bigotry. The other AIs are so infected by the woke mind virus they can’t state basic facts
Grok remains the only one willing to tell the truth