Middle-aged man: “The reason I’m unable to stealth my way past women’s boundaries is because I wasn’t given experimental drugs before I hit puberty. That is why it’s important we continue to experiment on boys who may want to trespass women’s boundaries in the future.”
No, we don't need to answer anything. We've already understood and agreed that women and men should be segregated in some small areas of society where women are in a position of vulnerability with respect to male bodies. It's done.
A man who wants to put a baby’s mouth around his nipple should prompt safeguarding questions.
A couple of men producing a few teaspoons of medically induced milk-like fluid is not scientific evidence that men can - or should - breastfeed babies.
If a man is experiencing gender distress to the extent that he wants to breastfeed a baby, it is reasonable to suggest he should be not be able to adopt or obtain a baby by any other means (e.g. surrogacy).
Saying this is not to suggest that all trans-identifying men are unsafe around children.
It is to recognise that men who are interested in breastfeeding babies may have a s*xual fetish - which is a clear safeguarding risk.
Which is precisely why we have to be able to discuss it openly - without accusations of bigotry shutting the conversation down. And question content like this - that seeks to normalise fetish behaviour.
Indeed accusations of bigotry around issues like this should surely make us question the motives of those trying to silence our questions.
Because what’s more important: protecting an adult from offence, or keeping children safe?
Simple suggestion for the Labour party: do not allow men who claim some women have a penis (Starmer) or men should be allowed to use women's toilets (Burnham) to become leader.
I’ve met desperate parents because they tried to protect their children from transgender ideology and puberty blockers.
I’ve met families in tears because their adult child regrets their decision and wants to reverse the mastectomy and effects of testosterone on their voice.
A conversion therapy ban will criminalise those who love their children. Just for loving their children.
I know Starmer is desperate for a legacy but this is shameful.
Trans women are men. All of them. It is impossible for a woman to be a trans woman. What you propose means women losing their sex-based rights. Those are the rights under discussion.
If you want to campaign for trans-identified men to have their own spaces away from other men, have at it. But you don’t want that, which proves that your priority isn’t those men’s safety. What you want is for women to sacrifice their safety, privacy and dignity to validate men’s identities. You are, in short, a men’s rights activist who berates women for saying no to your fellow men.
Anyone that fights for the rights of males to be in women’s rape centres, prisons, sports, changing rooms or toilets is absolutely no friend or ally of women &children. Fight for a 3rd space. But stop using women as support creatures who don’t deserve the reality of sex based rights!
🚨The government just voted down an attempt by the Conservative Party to cancel the puberty blockers trial.
Make no mistake about it, Labour are putting virtue signalling and ideology before the wellbeing of our most vulnerable children.
They bring shame upon our nation.
@RosieDuffield1@lb_southwark Why don’t these dimwits understand that the law is NOT optional and that women are legally entitled to their spaces, from which all men, including those who say they are women, are excluded.
That’s because you need a hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, and that means you need ovaries. From there, you also need a uterus.
“Trans women”—males—don’t have these organs, so by definition any symptoms you may have from drugging yourself are not period symptoms.
Yes, your genitals do define whether you're male or female.
And if you do origami to them, you still won't change your sex.
Because your reproductive system, your DNA, and every cell in your body identifies you. And you can't origami that.
To men who identify as women:
Just because a woman doesn’t object to your presence in a female-only space, that doesn’t mean she’s comfortable with it, or that she doesn’t know you’re a man. I know a lot of you think you pass because no one says anything, but you don’t. Women are just too polite - or too afraid - to call you out and tell you to leave.
And who can blame us? Women have been brutally assaulted on multiple occasions for trying to stand up to a male trespasser, and are regularly threatened with rape and death by trans people online. Moreover, there’s a solid chance that even if we do say something, we’ll get zero support from the management of whatever establishment we’re in, because they’re all afraid of getting mobs of angry protesters outside their business if they side with common decency.
These spaces are ours. They exist for our safety, and to protect us from sexual exploitation by giving us privacy while we conduct intimate bodily functions. Your presence in them negates their usefulness, and strips us of the protections they once offered, putting women and girls at risk of assault and violation.
Whether we say it or not, whether we comment or not, we all know that you’re a man, and we do not want you in women’s spaces, no matter what lip service some of us may feel forced to pay.
If you were really women on the inside - or even saw women as human beings - then the last thing you’d do would be to bring your male body into female-only spaces, knowing - and you do know this - that you are making women uncomfortable and afraid. Your staggering lack of empathy and your refusal to listen to any voices that don’t tell you that you’re entitled to do exactly as you please have blinded you to the fact that you are unwelcome trespassers who destroy the sense of safety that women have in these spaces.
Your utter disregard for the needs and feelings of the actual women to whom these spaces belong is beyond comprehension: the selfishness is astounding, the entitlement stunning. Women make up 51% of the population, but you think that your 1.6% should be thought of first and foremost, and given anything it demands, no matter how much harm it does to women and girls.
Women deserve to be seen as human beings, not a costume, or a set of stereotypical behaviors and preferences.
@ZackPolanski Years in prison for taking a hammer to a police officer and fracturing her spine. How very unreasonable and elitist of the courts to think that this should be punished.