“The government could use the vulnerability to get in and apply the patch themselves.”
OpenAI president Greg Brockman is discussing a response to AI-driven cyber threats: government intervention when vulnerable servers remain unpatched and could be used to harm others.
In this November 4 exchange at WSJ Tech, he argues that quarterly patching will be too slow as AI finds more security flaws. He also acknowledges that intervening could have unintended consequences, including taking a service offline.
Asked whether he has discussed it with the administration, Brockman says they have begun floating the idea. He presents it as one possibility, with difficult questions still unresolved.
The full exchange leaves a serious question: who decides when protecting a network justifies entering someone else’s server?
Source: WSJ Tech, interview by Keach Hagey. November 4, 2026.
Bottom is in. Nvda is not the old nvda no more; It does not need Huang, better clean up asap.
They got smart ppl actual smart! Who can lead and fix the businesses from being cyclical mostly.
turn it into lifetime sustainable revenue generation business
Nvda needs HaaS SaaS and to lock their hardware for themselves to run and rent..
Bottom is in. Nvda is not the old nvda no more; It does not need Huang, better throw him off asap.
They got smart ppl actual smart can lead and fix the businesses rather than just sell hardware turn into lifetime sustainable revenue generation business; rather than cyclical.
Nvda needs HaaS SaaS and to lock their hardware for themselves to run and rent!
CEOing is an overrated job. Anyone can replace him. Especially when there is a database (knowledge). And by anyone I meant the ones who are already exposed to his field.
Ppl just over prophecies ceos for nothing much.
If tsla gets forked nowadays and ran by different ceo could have been more successful, elon was needed at the start of; thus Jensen.