MO_SURVIVAL_Chris

Christian,Husband,Father,AntiCommunist,Conservatarian.YouTuber

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Let’s talk about the “Candace is Satan” tweets. It’s necessary, because it’s (A) retarded and (B) nobody wants to explain why it’s retarded, lest they get accused of being a “Satan Apologist.” I don’t mind.

Its stupidity can be explained in 7 points.

(1) No, she isn’t. Satan is a literal celestial being who was cast down from Heaven, and spends his time stealing, killing, and devouring humanity, and has a special hatred for God’s chosen people, the Children of Abraham, His Holy Nation, the Christian Church.

Candace is just a mortal woman who you don’t like because she advocates a “conspiracy theory” that is mean to a person you like.

(2) When you say “Candace is Satan,” you’re just announcing your susceptibility to online hate marketing, and haven fully thought out how stupid it is to allege it. You might as well l tweet, “I’m vulnerable to emotional propaganda and I skipped the part where I check if the claim is true.”

Calling a woman “Satan incarnate” isn’t an argument. It’s an accusation. A dumb one.

(3) It also lets you skip the actual argument. If Candace is a supernatural agent of evil, you never have to explain what she got wrong. You just get to feel something and post about it. That’s not owning her, that’s making a retarded, hyperbolic, exaggerative supernatural claim to avoid explaining her malfunction.

Israeli propaganda has mastered this, and the best at it:
Q. Why do Arabs hate Israel?
A. “They’re evil.”

Right, Lol. The moment opponents are reduced to “evil,” is the moment that nobody’s asking the necessary “why” questions that have answers they don’t want you to think about. Like, maybe if the genocide on live TV for 20 years.

Ditto with Candace. If she can be explained as pure evil, you don’t have to think about Israel conducting more political assassinations on foreign soil over the last 50 than any nation on earth, or that our own intel agencies have helped them cover some up, or any other fact that - even if she’s wrong - still means it’s plausible.

Just like if Palestinians are reduced to pure evil, you don’t have to ask why Israel was was warned by numerous foreign intel agencies Oct 7 was coming, the IDF stood down, and why Netanyahu was arranging 30 million per month going to Hamas despite being told it was being used to plan the attack. All facts. And all facts that don’t matter the moment “they did it because they’re evil” enters the chat.

(4) It cheapens the real thing. Satan is a real being with a real war plan against real people, and he’s happy you spend your outrage budget on an Internet pundit while the actual influence operations in your church, your government, and your newsfeed sail through unchallenged.

(5) Odds are decent the real reason you went to “Satan” is that she said something you can’t refute, so you grabbed the worst accusation in the arsenal. Exaggerate much?

(6) When you say “Candace is Satan” five minutes after tweeting “I ❤️ the IDF,” for whom stealing, killing, and destroying civilian non-combatants at a ratio of 9 to 1 is their track record, your judgment is broken. We don’t care who you condemn, because we see who you applaud. When you commend legitimate evil, who you condemn has no moral authority.

(7) The worst case scenario is that she’s crazy. Obviously, she believes her theory. Deeply. That doesn’t make her right. It does make her less than Satan. Given what she believes happened, her actions - which amount to acting like it happened - tracks. In other words, even if her theory proves nonsense, her actions make sense, based on that nonsense.

If you’re alleging she knows she’s wrong and doing it any way, then sure, she’s evil. But that’s a heck of a conspiracy theory. Even if that were the case, equating her to Satan means you’re either being overly dramatic or have no regard for the evil celestial being busy stacking the bodies of children in Gaza right now.

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@DavidLimbaugh Been thinks Jesus was a sorcerer that fomented a revolution was killed for his troubles (he said that on the hoe Rogan podcast) so don’t put too much stock in what one guy who rejects the messiah believes what sin is and isn’t or even what is moral.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

I’m glad you finally came to the surface, rat. Your previous employees told me it was you and Erika that were teaming up with the YouTubers to put out the utterly fake narrative that Charlie and I were not friends and he had “anxiety”. You also worked together to lie about his pull toward Catholicism and to put out the deranged narrative that I secretly loved Charlie and hadn’t spoken to him since 2019 despite me touring with him through to May 2024.

Your lies are easy to debunk. I simply could not have demanded to speak at any TPUSA event because we had a speaker contract that rolled over annually, Andrew. This means I never ever had to beg or even request to speak at any event because I was contractually obligated to speak at every major TPUSA event, every year.

It’s also utterly ludicrous to suggest he didn’t pick up my calls because I never call. Any person who knows me knows I never pick up or call people. But you lie so much, I am going to accept this easy challenge to prove that you are a liar by releasing every single time I dialed Charlie’s number for the last 3 years.

As soon as I am back on air, that will be released. Gratefully, telephone logs go back 5 years. I simply prefer to text— and I thank God for that, as I’ve been able to debunk your lies about Charlie because of that habit.
Like I said, your number one problem is you are dumb.

Regarding your narrative that we never spoke, I literally just released Charlie and I discussing your partner Johnnie’s Moore’s demonic attack against ‘Christ is King’— a convo initiated by Charlie. Those messages are dated May 2025. But hey, let’s hear Charlie in his own words regarding our friendship—Shall we?

Here is Charlie, captured August 21st 2025—3 weeks before he died. He made it clear on stage that I was his friend and he wouldn’t be morally blackmailed against our friendship by people like you.

Also the night before he died— he texted you guys saying he wanted me back at Amfest after your Zionist backers demanded I be put on ice for Amfest 2024. Why did he text Justin and tell him he wanted me back? Do you deny that happened?
Those were again, Charlie’s words. One of the last wishes he expressed.

So was Charlie lying to his audience (and to his team in private conversations) weeks before he died, Andrew or are you simply a special kind of demon for attempting to rewrite history and convince the world that his real friends were people like Ben Shapiro and the very Zionists he was fighting against for his freedom?

Despite the millions of dollars spent— the world sees what is real. Truth cannot be destroyed.

Neither can Charlie’s voice. Here it is:

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

I’m sure if he wore an Israeli flag jacket it would have been totally acceptable 🤡

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

BREAKING: PA State Rep Eric Davanzo (R) says he was removed from the House floor for wearing a patriotic jacket ahead of America's 250th

[Ian Carroll @IanCarrollShow]

Israel’s about to put Palestinians in concentration camps in 2026. And people will still take their money to pretend it’s okay online.

Turns out never again only pertains to the chosenites, not to goyim.

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

I usually don’t care about the opinion of Political Beth Moore, because I don’t like hearing the Daily Wire twice.

But here’s a fun fact: Had the Jews spit on a Christian pilgrim in front of their assigned Janissary guard under Ottoman Rule- like what regularly happens today in Jerusalem - they’d have been beaten within an inch if their life, and if they survived, fined. By comparison, Israel doesn’t prosecute it because “it’s a cherished ancient Jewish custom.”

The Ottomans conquered a Palestine with 20% Christians, and 400 years later, there were 20% Christians. The Status Quo they established was adopted by Europe and preserved even after their reign ended. The Millet system protected them from Jewish violence, land confiscation, and property forfeiture. It exempted them from military service and exempted the elderly, disabled, widows, and children, and churches from taxation. It emphasized Holy Site preservation, established their legal protection, and on occasion, chipped in for repair.

All facts.

Outside Palestine, and outside that era, they were brutes, and perhaps - in certain eras - just as violent as the IDF is today. None of that excuses or diminishes their atrocities.

Meanwhile, after 77 years of Jewish rule, the Israelis have managed to accomplish what 400 years of Muslim rule could not - the utter collapse of indigenous Christianity in Palestine.

In Gaza, the IDF has murdered FAR more Christians than Hamas. In Lebanon, they’ve killed FAR more than Hezbollah. They bombed churches the Ottomans protected. They taxed congregations to whom the Ottomans gave protected status.

When Israelis defend their genocide, they point at Hitler. When Israelis defend bombing churches, they point at Nagasaki. When Israelis defend Lehava and La Familia burning down Jewish churches, beating Christian clergy, and intimidating nuns, they point at Boko Haram in Nigeria.

Thing is, my taxes don’t fund Boko Haram’s militia, Hitler is dead, and God will deal with the U.S. dropping a nuke down the chimney of the church headquarters in Asia. None of that can be stopped by an act of the U.S. Congress.

Sadly, there are brainless twits auditioning for a guest spot on the Jeremy Boreing Israeli Infomercial Hour who don’t give a single heartless damn about persecuted Christians going extinct in the Holy Land. Whether or not Jesus’ followers “have a right to exist” will not be on the questions list.

After reminding the church that believing Gentiles are the real children of Abraham, and that only Christians inherit God’s promises, Paul tells them to bear the burdens of their fellow Christians (Galatians 6:2).

Not Jews. Not Muslims. Not Buddhists. CHRISTIANS. We shoulder THEIR burdens, and God will one day hold us accountable for funding the nation that has made Christians an endangered species in the Promised Land.

When Christian churches are burned down by Jewish settlers, they don’t complain.

When Israel refuses to investigate and prosecute, they speak not a word.

When churches are told - out of the blue - the properties they’ve held for millennia will be confiscated if they don’t cough up millions in “back taxes” they’ve gone 17 centuries without being charged, they don’t speak up.

When the same churches are bombed 2,3,4 times for no discernible reason, they look the other way.

When nuns in a full habit are sniped in the head with a .308, they don’t care.

When Bethlehem is surrounded and squeezed on three sides to bankrupt and starve its Christian inhabitants, they don’t notice.

And when the Indigenous Christians who were there when the first Israeli prime ministers were still on Europe’s Most Wanted terrorist lists, tell us in official statements through their Patriarchs that they had it better under the Ottoman Millet System, then suddenly they get very interested in Christian persecution in other eras, times, and places to distract you from the reality of that cold, hard, immovable fact.

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@Liz_Wheeler Trump helped democrats by not doing what he campaigned on and told us all if we’re still talking about Jeffrey Epstein he doesn’t want our support,so let the chips fall where they may, I’m not voting for republicans anymore(and definitely not democrats) let it all burn down

[Carrie Prejean Boller @CarriePrejean1]

“Therefore, the government lied about it, covered it up, and was probably involved… therefore ask the question, what else is our government involved in? It is the beginning of the end of the illegitimacy of this government and they know that”.
-Charlie Kirk on JFK

[Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu]

Dear Andrew,
In my opinion, Erika Kirk had foreknowledge of Charlie’s assassination and has been actively involved in the cover-up that followed.
Based on the evidence and patterns I’ve seen, I believe Erika, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer knew each other well before she was ever introduced to Charlie. Their connections appear to go back to Romania. I also believe Tyler Bowyer attempted to set Erika up with Charlie on at least three separate occasions before the timing finally worked in their favor.
I believe all three of them were foreign agents of israel and were placed around Charlie as handlers. Their job, in my view, was to keep him in line and steer him in the direction they wanted. Toward the end of his life, I believe Charlie became aware of this arrangement and realized he was essentially living in a real-life Truman Show. This is one of the reasons, in my opinion, that he decided to leave the pro-Israel cause. He also made moves to distance himself from certain people, including removing Tyler Bowyer as COO and replacing him with Justin Streif. Additionally, Charlie had an appointment scheduled for September 15th to update his end-of-life documents, which sadly he did;t make. I interpret that as him planning to remove Erika as his beneficiary.
Additionally, Charlie knew he was in danger. He told multiple people, including Dan Flood, that he believed “they were going to kill him.” We both know he wasnlt referring to radical trans liberals. He also allowed his life insurance policy to lapse, which I find significant. If someone genuinely believed their life was in danger, it would make little sense to let that policy expire unless it was intentional.
Since Charlie’s death, Erika has directed and supported coordinated attacks against those asking questions, particularly Candace Owens. She has also been caught colluding with the Trump Administration in efforts to stage and amplify certain narratives, including the staged White House Correspondents Dinner clip where she was pushed in a leaked email from the Pentagon and White House as an “emotional asset.”
Her behavior since the assassination has not resembled that of a typical grieving widow. She has remained highly visible, continued traveling extensively, and has shown little apparent concern about leaving her children without either parent present if God forbid if something happend to her as well.
She has also been caught in multiple contradictions and lies. She even admitted to researching how other widows behave so she could mimic their actions. In my opinion, this suggests she was performing grief rather than experiencing it naturally. I do not believe she ever truly loved Charlie. Instead, I see a consistent pattern throughout her life of using romantic relationships as a means of social climbing for power, status, and fame. Every relationship she has been in publicly has involved high-profile men in sports, music, or politics.
She has already moved on and, according to multiple sources, has been seeing Blake Wynn since at least December 2025 — only three months after Charlie was killed. This fits the pattern of her always seeking to “level up” in terms of wealth and status. Charlie was a millionaire, Blake is a billionaire. (again leveling up)
When you also consider her family connections — including genealogical ties to the Rothstein family in Israel and the Rothschilds, who literally founded Israel — the picture becomes even more concerning to me. Additionally, there is an eyewitness account placing her at Fort Huachuca omn September 8th, with some suggesting this may have been connected to planning or testing for Charlie's assassination. While I cannot independently verify every detail, the cumulative pattern is difficult to ignore.
Again, this is my opinion based on the facts and evidence I have reviewed. I believe any reasonable person presented with the same information would find these connections deeply troubling and worthy of serious investigation. Remember in almost every homicide case, the victim's spouse is usully the number one suspect especially when there is a very obvious motive such as a multi million dollar life insurance policy, where she stands to take over a multiple hundred million dollar organization. Where the US Director of National Counterterrorism says there was evidence of a foreign nexus. So why has the FBI nor Utah state law enforcement looked at her as suspect?

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@glennbeck Nah it’s socialism,if healthcare was done in the same way you would be calling it socialism,you know it and I know it,voluntarily funding is the only moral way to fund any of it.

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@GmorganJr @NihiloX Yeah so much more plausible Charlie’s vertebrae stopped a 30-06 because he drank his milk and ate his carrots 🙄

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Yes, God instructed the Israelites in about 1025 B.C. to massacre them. Including their cattle (to demonstrate it was righteous vengeance, and not just because they wanted their stuff).

He can do that. He’s God, and they had filled the winepress of His fury for 400 years, until it overflowed. But, not the ancient Palestinians.

Their ancestors were NOT included in the Canaanite extermination mandate list of Deuteronomy 7 (Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites, Jebusites). They weren’t the ancient Amalekites, either.

In fact, Amos 9:7 says it was God Himself that brought their ancestors to Philistia (Palestine) to settle there, JUST LIKE the Israelites:

“Are you not like the Cushites to me, O people of Israel? declares the Lord. Did I not bring up Israel from the land of Egypt, and the Philistines from Caphtor and the Syrians from Kir?”

God brought them to settle there. I’d say “blame God,” but Jews might take that literally. We saw what they did to God in the flesh.

Meanwhile, to help you think this out, not only are the Palestinians not on the extermination list, and God placed them there, but they’re also the ancestors of Abraham, genetically even more Semitic than the majority of Israelis (Ashkenaz is in the line of Japheth, not Shem). That’s why DNA studies demonstrate Palestinians are more kin to Abraham than, say, Israel’s Polish President.

So the irony is, you’re advocating for majority-Europeans to butcher Abraham’s genetic lineage because God told the Israelites to wipe out some other people three-thousand years ago.

Further, that was a “positive command” in Scripture - aka a command given to a specific people at a specific time for a specific purpose - it is not an eternal permission slip to commit mass murder.

IE, God told David to take the head of a giant, but that’s not to permission for some Hebrew Cosplayer to kill Shaq and his entire family.

In fact, God is going to redeem ALL of the Palestinians and give them Zion for inheritance.

Speaking of them, Zechariah 9:7 says, “I will take away its blood from its mouth, and its abominations from between its teeth; it too shall be a remnant for our God.”

1. Feel free to argue that modern Palestinians aren’t ancient Philistines just bc they’re related and live in the same place. But then, that’d be true for Israel, too.

2. Or argue that modern Israelis are ancient Israelites, but then the Palestines are also the Philistines, and God says to leave them alone because He has a plan to save them.

Take your pick. Either way, there’s no justification for murdering women, children, and civilian combatants because 3k years ago God’s winepress filled with wrath. It’s already been poured out.

[Gordon @DV_Gordon]

@DavidJHarrisJr Even many Jews dont support:

-raping prisoners
-purposely maiming kids -knowing 10/7 was coming & allowing it
-murdering Christians
-calling for millions in Lebanon to burn
-announcing future wars
-using religion to steal land

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@VividProwess I’m with Jesus Christ the True Israel not heretics in the desert

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Yes, the Jews killed Jesus on purpose. Because Jesus said so.

“But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God…” (John 8:37-40).

They killed Him on purpose because Peter said so.

“Peter addresses Jerusalem directly: ‘Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36).”

They killed Jesus on purpose because the Jews themselves said so.

“Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children” (Matthew 27:35).

They killed Jesus because Paul said so.

“…for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15).

Heck, even the Talmud says so Sanhedrjn 43a, hanged on a tree at Passover for sorcery and “leading Israel astray.”

They did it preemptively, because John 11 informs us that after Jesus rose Lazarus from the dead, they were afraid everyone would figure out He was Messiah and the Romans would take away their precious nation.

“So the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered the council and said, “What are we to do? For this man performs many signs. If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation” (John 11:47-48).

So, if Jesus, the Jews themselves, the lead Apostle to the Gentiles, the lead Apostles to the Jews, all admitted the Jews killed Jesus, and the meeting minutes of the preemptive plot to kill Jesus by manipulating the Romans is narrated for us inside the Bible, the Jews killed Jesus.

The point isn’t to say, “Therefore the Jews are bad.” The point is exactly the same as Peter’s when he accuses them in the first sermon after Pentecost, so they will ask, “What must we do to be saved?”

When the Centurion who drove in spear realized who Jesus was, he admitted, “Surely, this is the Son of God,” His name was Longinus, and he repented of his sin, and trusted Christ to the point of death.

The Romans did the work, like an abortion doctor or a hit man. They’re complicit, too. But they repented and eventually, converted en masse.

Yes, Jesus was crucified by the will of God. But notice how Peter says it:

“Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain” (Acts 2:23).

God’s plan was Jesus to be crucified **by wicked hands** and the “you” who crucifed and slain him” were to whom he made his address, the “Men of Israel” (Acts 2:23).

In other words, it was God the Father’s plan to have God the Son be murdered by the Jews, using the Romans to do the dirty work, and the Jews said - in advance - they’d take the blame.

In as a simple ways as I can put it, Jesus died FOR the world, but He died BY the Jews BECAUSE OF the will of God.

He died as a propitiatory sacrifice, vicariously for sinners who believe in Him, on account of our sin before a righteous God, to propitiate God’s wrath for sinful people who couldn’t endure that wrath themselves.

Dispensationalism’s novel error is believing that unbelieving Jews retain a Covenant with God apart from faith in Jesus. THAT is the error. What makes it sub-biblical isn’t their belief God will save the Jews and Jesus will reign from Jerusalem. I believe that, too.

The error is asserting that unbelieving Jews retain a Covenant with God and can access that Covenant’s blessings and promises irrespective of them being cut off from Abraham (Romans 11:20).

No Jesus, No Covenant. No Jesus, No promises (2 Cor 1:20).

Bless you.

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Yes, the Jews killed Jesus on purpose. Because Jesus said so.

“But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God…” (John 8:37-40).

They killed Him on purpose because Peter said so.

“Peter addresses Jerusalem directly: ‘Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:36).”

They killed Jesus on purpose because the Jews themselves said so.

“Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children” (Matthew 27:35).

They killed Jesus because Paul said so.

“…for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:14-15).

Heck, even the Talmud says so Sanhedrjn 43a, hanged on a tree at Passover for sorcery and “leading Israel astray.”

They did it preemptively, because John 11 informs us that after Jesus rose Lazarus from the dead, they were afraid everyone would figure out He was Messiah and the Romans would take away their precious nation.

“So the chief priests and the Pharisees gathered the council and said, “What are we to do? For this man performs many signs. If we let him go on like this, everyone will believe in him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation” (John 11:47-48).

So, if Jesus, the Jews themselves, the lead Apostle to the Gentiles, the lead Apostles to the Jews, all admitted the Jews killed Jesus, and the meeting minutes of the preemptive plot to kill Jesus by manipulating the Romans is narrated for us inside the Bible, the Jews killed Jesus.

The point isn’t to say, “Therefore the Jews are bad.” The point is exactly the same as Peter’s when he accuses them in the first sermon after Pentecost, so they will ask, “What must we do to be saved?”

When the Centurion who drove in spear realized who Jesus was, he admitted, “Surely, this is the Son of God,” His name was Longinus, and he repented of his sin, and trusted Christ to the point of death.

The Romans did the work, like an abortion doctor or a hit man. They’re complicit, too. But they repented and eventually, converted en masse.

Yes, Jesus was crucified by the will of God. But notice how Peter says it:

“Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain” (Acts 2:23).

God’s plan was Jesus to be crucified **by wicked hands** and the “you” who crucifed and slain him” were to whom he made his address, the “Men of Israel” (Acts 2:23).

In other words, it was God the Father’s plan to have God the Son be murdered by the Jews, using the Romans to do the dirty work, and the Jews said - in advance - they’d take the blame.

In as a simple ways as I can put it, Jesus died FOR the world, but He died BY the Jews BECAUSE OF the will of God.

He died as a propitiatory sacrifice, vicariously for sinners who believe in Him, on account of our sin before a righteous God, to propitiate God’s wrath for sinful people who couldn’t endure that wrath themselves.

Dispensationalism’s novel error is believing that unbelieving Jews retain a Covenant with God apart from faith in Jesus. THAT is the error. What makes it sub-biblical isn’t their belief God will save the Jews and Jesus will reign from Jerusalem. I believe that, too.

The error is asserting that unbelieving Jews retain a Covenant with God and can access that Covenant’s blessings and promises irrespective of them being cut off from Abraham (Romans 11:20).

No Jesus, No Covenant. No Jesus, No promises (2 Cor 1:20).

Bless you.

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Our first duty is to protect Western Civilization from White liberal women, obsessed with murdering their own babies and assisting with their own rape and pillaging.

Our second duty is to protect White liberal women from themselves.

WWJD.

[MO_SURVIVAL_Chris @mosh_417]

@JesseDornfeld Supported neither and be done with it

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

Dispensational Zionism is an authentically Jewish way of interpreting the Old Testament. No doubt. They use the same hermeneutic to come to the same conclusions, except what Jews are calling the Messianic Age, Dispensational Zionists are calling the Second Advent.

This uniquely Jewish hermeneutic, that reads a political kingdom, national Israel, and obsession with geographical hegemony into every passage and places Jews at the center of God’s universe, is why they failed to recognize their own Messiah when they were crucifying Him.

It’s why some, like the Sanhedrin, knew He was the Messiah and murdered Him anyway, and why even after seeing Him raised again from the dead, they murdered his followers. Why? They wanted their kingdom more than they wanted their own King.

For 1800 years, Christians interpreted the Bible, unsurprisingly, as Christians, using a Christ-centered hermeneutic that presumed it was all about Jesus, not Israel, and about Christ’s Kingdom, not theirs.

Darby made the church a “parentheses,” turned Christians into a divine distraction while God kindly awaited His first love to come back around, and took the same exact world that Jews thought their political warlord savior would build, and applied it to the Second Coming. To do so, he allowed Jews to retain a special Covenant status with God apart from faith in Jesus, turned God into a respecter of persons, exchanged divine election for genetic birthright, and made Christians into a second-class afterthought keeping their seat warm until the Jews came back home.

The Judaizing Heresy of the New Testament got a new, eschatological suit, retained the notion of ethnic privilege, and demoted Jesus from global Messiah to the tribal bush deity mascot of a desert war cult who serves as divine doormat until, at such time, the Jews allow Him to return from exile and make Him king again.

Worse yet, Christians are told they must prove they love Jesus by proving they love his rejectors, by helping them return from the exile God gave them, helping to re-establish the very kingdom God destroyed, to await the rebuilding of a literal temple that Peter says is the Body of Christ. But if you oppose this scheme, you oppose Abraham, and God will curse and destroy you.

I praise God daily that the bewitching curse is being lifted in Christendom, and fewer people than ever are countenancing this bizarre superstition.

[JD™ @LostMyHats]

We call you heretics because it requires believing a person can access God’s Covenant promises and blessings outside of faith in Jesus.

2 Corinthians 1:20 “For all the promises of God find their Yes in him. That is why it is through him that we utter our Amen to God for his glory.”

ALL of the promises it says.

It requires rejecting the Holy Scripture that says Christians are the heirs of Abraham’s promises, not unbelieving Jews:

Galatians 3:29 “And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to promise.”

It requires considering unbelieving Jews to be part of God’s chosen Israel:

Romans 9:6-8 “…For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but…it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.”

The division of God’s Covenant between “land promises” and “spiritual promises” was invented in an Irish basement of a schismatic End Times sect in 1821. It’s not historic. It’s not biblical. ALL promises are tied to faith in Jesus.

Without Jesus you go to hell. You probably know that, sure, despite I doubt you’ve ever said it to a Jew (which isn’t very loving of you tbh), so how incredibly pointless is it to argue about who has the real estate deed to a desert dump? WHAT DOES IT PROFIT A MAN IF HE GAINS THE GAZA STRIP AND LOSES HIS OWN SOUL?

For the love of God, if you love the Jewish people, would your time not be better spent telling them their alleged inheritance with worth NOTHING without Jesus as it is lecturing Christians on why Israelis are entitled to our tax dollars to maintain their real estate holdings?

Jesus decrees the destruction of their temple, and with it, their nation. And here you are, convinced that your job as a Christian is to give it back to them despite the fact they’ll split hell open the moment they pass from this life without Christ.

If they don’t want Muslims in the same zip code, you best use your energy explaining they’re going to share the same zip code for eternity if they don’t repent and trust in Jesus.

There’s no promised land in hell.

[OzarkNightOwl @NightowlOzark]

@DavidLimbaugh Not replacement. Fulfillment and continuance. Genesis mentions the seed, not seeds, that nations would be blessed with the same blessing and that the unbelieving jews weren't part of it. Paul said it was like going from school to master. You're putting jews in the place of God.