I’ll say this one last time: hold these stocks through the end of the year, and you could be looking at a new car and a new home.
$OUST ~ Ouster
$MBLY ~ Mobileye
$TSLA ~ Tesla
$AEVA ~ Aeva Technologies
$VPG ~ Vishay Precision Group
$SYNA ~ Synaptics
$CGNX ~ Cognex
$BB ~ BlackBerry
Don’t believe me? Just come back at the end of the year and look at this list I mentioned.
$BTC RUNS ON A CLOCK THAT HAS NEVER MISSED
It works pretty simply:
Bear cycle- 365 days
Bull cycle - 1064 days
Then repeat
Despite its simplicity, this method has proven accurate twice in a row
We're currently on day 252 of the bear phase
Which means roughly 100 days left before the clock flips
So get ready - 3 months is more than enough time for that
Dont forget: I called the $BTC crash from $126k before it happened - publicly, on this page
Every local move since then - mapped out here too
The next update is the most important one this cycle - we're approaching the level where the real bottom forms
Follow now to not miss the update - turn on notifications to see it first
Eric Trump just flipped the script on Chris Cuomo live on-air, leaving him shocked.
Cuomo accused President Trump of going after his political opponents the moment he took office…
Eric sounded off:
“Did we, did we try and bankrupt Biden? Did we raid Biden's home? Did we try and bankrupt Biden?”
“Did we weaponize every AG and DA against Biden? Do we do that against Hunter Biden who had a laptop from hell, pictures of cocaine, illicit drug use, prostitution?”
“Did we make up a dirty dossier? About Biden, did they try and destroy Biden's marriage? Did we make up stories that Biden had secret servers in the basement of his home communicating with the Kremlin in Russia?”
“Did we strip Biden off the ballot of multiple states? Did we take Biden off of Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and try and silence his voice so he couldn't communicate?”
“Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day for nonsense to try and keep him off of a campaign trail to try and destroy his life?”
Well done @MrPoolQ1
INSIGHTS:
Tom Lee just made a comparison that stops you cold.
Bitcoin today is like Bitcoin at $1,000.
He recommended it then. Everyone misunderstood it.
He says it's being misunderstood the exact same way right now.
Here is what's different beneath the surface.
Back then the story was simple. Digital gold.
Today it's something much bigger.
ICE and major banks are rebuilding their entire tech stacks on crypto rails.
AI engineers tinker with crypto on weekends.
Because decentralized systems are how you actually control AI agents.
That last point is the one nobody's pricing in.
As AI agents start transacting on their own.
They need rails no single company controls.
That's not a stock. That's a blockchain.
And Lee says Ethereum and smart contract platforms.
Are even more undervalued than Bitcoin.
The setup he's describing is the same one he saw at $1,000.
Misunderstood. Ignored. Early.
He was right then.
The question is whether he's early again.
Or wrong this time.
This Has Only Happened 3 Times in Crypto History.
It's About to Happen Again...
TimeStamps:
00:00 Only happened 3 times before in Bitcoin's history
01:20 Scaramucci & Novogratz #Bitcoin Outlook
04:01 First Fannie Mae-backed mortgage utilizing Bitcoin
05:18 Ripple CEO's Bitcoin Prediction ($XRP News)
You Are Being Lied To About #Crypto on CNBC (insane fail)
TimeStamps:
00:00 Intro
00:55 Legendary Investor SLAMS Crypto on CNBC
05:49 Gets Owned in Real Time
08:25 #Bitcoin Closes Under 200-Week MA
Bitcoin is oversold!
At least according to Fairlead's Katie Stockton:
"The good news for Bitcoin traders or investors is that we have a long-term oversold condition."
"We're looking for stabilization. Ideally it does happen in this range."
"I'm a Bitcoin bull... I'm not really on board with these four year cycles. We don't really have enough of them to feel confident in them but I'm always looking for signs of downside exhaustion for that opportunity."
Crypto is still worth investing into. 💯
At least according to analyst Tom Lee:
"I think without question in 12 months we're gonna say crypto was a downstream story of AI just like memory was sort of a has-been story in 2024 & 2025. They were stuck. They didn't go anywhere and look what happened in 2026. They all went parabolic."
"Almost every asset is going to be built on a crypto rail. It is more efficient. It offers finality. And it lets it trade 24/7"
"It's happening but it's slow and then sudden. To me 2026 has been a big set back year. It's been disappointing but to me the fundamental progress is still there."
Bitcoin's 4-year cycle is NOT REAL!?
Why Smart Money Is Getting Bullish On Crypto
Timestamps:
0:22 - The case for $200k BTC
1:08 - #1 Biggest Mistake
1:22 - “4-year cycle not real”
3:54 - Adam Back: 200w MA is KEY!
5:07 - Tom Lee admits he was wrong
7:25 - Wall Street 100% adopting crypto
8:50 - Looking forward
9:40 - BlackRock CIO is bullish
WATCH 👇
I bring home a trapped coyote and let it loose in the kitchen.
Hackles up. Teeth bared. Pissing on the floor.
My wife says, "Get it out."
I tell her that is a very unwelcoming and unchristian way to speak about a future house pet.
The children back into the hallway.
I tell them it's a rescue.
I tell them fences are fear.
I tell them cages are barbaric.
I tell them the old rules were cruel.
I tell them it will domesticate in time.
Then I grab my lunchbox and leave them to live with my principles.
When I get home, there is blood on the floor, and the experts who sold me on compassion are already explaining why nobody could have seen this coming.
Anyway, that's Western migration policy.
Adam Back is a prominent British cryptographer and the CEO of Blockstream. He is widely speculated to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous inventor of Bitcoin.
In less than 40 seconds he explains WHY Bitcoin is a generational buying opportunity right now:
NVIDIA was $10 in 2022. Palantir was $8 in 2023. Both went up 20x times.
While everyone’s buying the same popular tech stocks…
There are 5 companies that nobody talks about, but could hit similar returns as NVIDIA & Palantir.
Here's what they are:🧵
This is why your ground beef always turns out grey and bland.
Most people throw it in the pan and immediately start breaking it up, which causes all the juices to leak out and the meat to boil instead of sear. This guy shows the simple fix — let it brown like a steak (on both sides) first before breaking it up. The difference in color and flavor is huge.
Would you try cooking your ground beef this way from now on? I know I am!
“They are killing enormous numbers of civilians…they are targeting one, two, three enemy combatants and in the process killing huge numbers of civilians. @piersmorgan Piers a few minutes later – “If you can’t say exactly how many civilians have been killed in Gaza, what you say about numbers is bull.”
Dear @piersmorgan I tried to explain to you where numbers in the Gaza war (or any war) are going to come from "simply.” But let me type it out so you have a record of it instead of the interruptions and the tactic of just asking the same question over and over while I explain how the numbers work. The same numbers by the way that you used minutes before to criticize Israel and constantly repeat or have guests on that repeat, or more often state not even Hamas numbers but false numbers about xx civilians, xx women, xx children, xx percentages that go beyond Hamas's actual list of casualties.
First, let me correct you again (like I did to start the segment) by providing you my actual quotes:
1 - "Israel and the IDF have implemented more measures (sometimes quoted as precautions) to prevent civilian harm in urban warfare than any military in history,"
That is testable against urban warfare history of any similar situation (mostly attack of defended urban terrain). Israel civilian harm mitigation measure have included advance notification (flyers, phone calls, text messages, voicemails, drones with speakers, tv, radio, social media), safe corridors to include improving roads used for safe corridors in the middle of the war, roof knocking (notifying all residents of a building in advance for evacuations and then using non-penetrating low-yield munitions on top of the building before then waiting to strike), over daily multi-hour pauses in fighting (over 400 days of the 800 days of fighting) to allow civilian evacuations and aid movement, establishing a one-star commanded civilian harm mitigation cell that created a real time civilian presence (using cell phone presence, drones, satellite images, etc.) software reflected on all combat operating systems, handing out their own military maps to the entire population (to include the enemy) and then communicating the location of IDF operations, areas to avoid or further evacuate, using major call outs of buildings and neighborhoods, restrictive rules of engagement based on likely civilian presence, rigorous fires processes and legal reviews that often ended in calling mission off out of civilian harm estimates. Many of these measures have never been attempted, by any military.
2 - "Israel has a lower civilian to combatant ratio than any similar context (war or battle) in the history of urban warfare.” After acknowledging the lack of comparative cases (size of enemy forces (which I asked you about, you don't know), tunnels, density, strategy, tactics, prevention of civilian evacuations) but still doing the simple analysis, in order to provide the evidence for this statement I use the same numbers you and your frequent guests push to condemn Israel. But here:
Q: How do you estimate the number of civilians deaths?
A: Take the number the Hamas Gaza Health Ministry reports (despite that it includes any death in Gaza for any reason or cause (Israel/Hamas/Other terrorists) and has been well documented with inaccuracies (even having to be updated by Hamas of natural deaths, incomplete entries, false entries) and subtract the Israel stated combatant deaths.
The Hamas Gaza Health Ministry claims roughly 72,000 deaths in Gaza. The IDF says it has killed about 25,000-26,000 combatants, a number also reported by President Trump in October 2025. If you subtract 25,000 from 72,000, even using Hamas’s number at face value, you get roughly 47,000 non-combatant deaths, or a bit less than a 2:1 ratio. If you were modest to adjust for natural deaths and Hamas-caused deaths, is likely closer to 35,000–40,000 non-combatant deaths versus 25,000 combatants killed, which puts the ratio closer to 1.5:1.
If you compare 2:1 or 1.5:1 to any numbers we have (in many cases we don’t have) for wars, urban centric wars, contested urban battles they will be some of the lowest ratios (in some cases lowest by far) ever seen despite none of those wars or battles had the context of Gaza. For example:
World War II – 70 million civilians, 20 million combatants, 3.5:1
Korean War – 2.5 million civilians, 90,000 combatants, 27:1
Iraq War – 280-300,000 civilians, 150-200,000 combatants, 1.4:1 to 2:1
But wait, the Gaza numbers are usually aggregated numbers for the entire war, any death ever reported in Gaza.
But if you disaggregate the numbers to specific battles like Rafah, Khan Yunis, Gaza City 2025 for comparison you get different numbers. Based on modest numbers from the Battle of Rafah, the civilian to combatant ratio would be more like 1:100 due to multiple operational variables like the success of civilian evacuations.
Major urban battles (modest comparison of battles with any like variables).
Mosul – 10,000 civilians. Combatant unknown but total estimate in battle 5,000 – 2:1
Manila – 100,000 civilians. Combatants 17,000 – 6:1
Seoul – Unknown/no record of civilian but very likely high ratio based on histories
Mariupol – Unknown/mass graves, estimate 20-22,000 civilians, 3-8,000 combatants - 2.5:1 to 7.3:1
I actually use this discussion about numbers or quote about ratio sparingly despite how many times it has been attribute to me because I know the complexity of casualty counting especially in urban centric wars with combatants that violate the law of war and do not distinguish themselves (uniforms/marking) making determining a body found (if there is a body) or a name reported (such as methods in Gaza) and then classifying that person as was participating in the hostilities (combatant) or not (noncombatant) is beyond just difficult and should always be viewed as questionable. In Mosul, a year after the battle there was not only no agreed upon casualty number, but the Mayor of the city also said there were 40,000 civilian deaths. These numbers are always messy, political, susceptible to manipulation by the different organizations involved.
My point has always been that numbers of casualty reporting in Gaza doesn’t paint the story people routinely push. Actually, the opposite.
Urban warfare is inherently and historically costly against civilians and the infrastructure. All wars involve noncombatant death. The moral, legal requirement is to do proportionality assessments and take feasible steps to prevent excessive civilian harm.
So, using your logic Piers, if you can’t state how many combatants were killed (by Israel, Hamas, terrorist rockets, other terrorists in power struggles) … you can’t say (or allow your guests to say) Israel has killed a “large number of civilians” or “killed a disproportionate number of civilians” like you did in this very interveiw.
You can't spend years saying Israel is killing enormous numbers of civilians and then tell me nobody can estimate civilian deaths so ratios aren't valid. Those two positions can't both be true.
If casualty estimates are reliable enough to accuse Israel, then they're also reliable enough to examine civilian-to-combatant ratios. If they aren't, then they shouldn't be used selectively only when they support one conclusion.
🚨 Leftists always scream “America has sky-high murder rates because of guns!”
Watch this.
The guy claims the US is near the top globally. Then the facts hit: Remove just five cities — Chicago, Detroit, Washington D.C., St. Louis, and Philadelphia — and America drops to 189th out of 193 countries in murder rate.
What do ALL five of those bloodbath cities have in common for decades?
Democrat mayors. Democrat city councils. Democrat soft-on-crime policies.
Failed progressive experiments, defund movements, gun control that disarms the good guys, and revolving-door “justice.”
This isn’t a “gun problem.” It’s a Democrat urban failure problem.
The Second Amendment isn’t the issue — criminals and the politicians protecting them are.
Video nails it. Share the truth.
NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR THIS BUT BITCOIN JUST GAVE THE CLEANEST SIGNAL OF THIS CYCLE.
Every bottom a pump. Every top a dump.
We just hit the bottom.
Topside of the channel is next.
$320K target.
This isn't a prediction.
This is the channel doing exactly what it has done every single time.
Take profit at the top.
Most people will only find out after it happens.
THIS SETUP LAUNCHED BITCOIN FROM $17K TO $69K.
It just printed again.
Old ATH broken.
Perfect retest confirmed. Structure holding.
2020: Same break. Same retest.
Then 4x.
This is not noise.
This is the launchpad.
New ATH targets loading right now.
History already told you what comes next.
Are you positioned?
THE CHART ALREADY KNOWS WHERE BITCOIN IS GOING.
And it's not $100K. It's not $200K.
It's not even $300K.
$600,000.
The structure has been building toward this the entire time.
The chart doesn't lie.
The chart doesn't have emotions.
The chart doesn't care if you believe it.
It just prints the next target.
$600,000.
Laugh now.
Bookmark this later.