@AnandPuru@Agamemnonuwa "Wait, so you actually do believe Hitler genuinely cared about their human rights? Lol." are you incapable of putting that into the context I explained myself in. He thought (at least in just 1920), that *in their own homeland, not in Germany, how hard is that to get around.*
@AnandPuru@Agamemnonuwa There is no indiation he was being sarcastic.
"You arguing that Hitler was genuinely promoting the human rights of Jews?" in their homeland ffs, away from Germany.
Jut because he didn't think they could maintain a state doesn't mean he didn't want them to go away home
@AnandPuru@Agamemnonuwa I was wrong it was on 6 July 1920: โJews belong to Palestine and it is only there that they can expect their full civil rights.โ when a heckler then argued violated their human rights, he said that they 'should seek human rights where they belong, in his own state of Palestine'.
@Mohd_Aliiiy during the colonisation of tanzania, india, ghana, egypt the indigenous populations were not replaced like how the white british are today in their own homelands. a couple thousand british ruling over millions of indigenous ppl in a colony isnt the same as current mass migration
@ZoomerHistorian 'A Jew cannot be a good Englishman unless he is a good Jew...'
'A Jew cannot be a good Englishman unless...'
'A Jew can be a good Englishman unless...'
'A Jew can be a good Englishman...'
'A Jew can be an Englishman...'
- Churchill... ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
@CFC_Junior_@RoyalEndeavour So, the Normans conquered but didn't replace the ANglo-Celtic population of Britain (25-40% of British dna then and now was Germanic invader, nearly all the rest was and is Celtic); and new research seems to show the Germanic influx of the Anglo-Saons was rather peaceful