@griffinpdavis Damn. That is a glorious burn.
To her credit, stacy has a cute bio: "I’m either angry or trying to be funny. You figure out which"
I assume she's angry (that she can't pretend Dems have some moral authority anymore).
🚨PLEASE READ THIS
Lets get some things straight regarding the Khafre Projects claims about discovering massive subterranean complexes under the Giza Plateau and significant substructural engineering on the Khafre Pyramid:
First here is the TLDR for people:
✔️ SAR is detecting surface-coupled displacements, not direct reflections from deep structures.
✔️ Resonance through piezoelectric and acoustic coupling is plausible, especially in Giza’s geophysical context.
✔️ Inversion of SAR phase shifts to identify resonant sources is challenging, but not unprecedented.
✔️ Giza’s geology and geometry provide the necessary conditions for this kind of coupling, making it possible where it wouldn’t work elsewhere.
Many of the critiques assume Direct EM Penetration through rock, that is NOT what is being claimed!
The claim is NOT that SAR is directly penetrating 2 km of rock. Instead, Biondi’s method proposes that SAR is detecting secondary surface deformations caused by deep mechanical resonance not direct EM wave reflections. SAR already measures surface deformations with millimeter-scale precision using interferometric techniques (InSAR), that’s how we monitor earthquake zones and volcanic inflation.
If deep voids beneath the Giza Plateau are resonating, the surface could experience subtle, periodic displacements, detectable through SAR’s phase-sensitive Doppler processing. SAR doesn’t need to penetrate rock directly, it just needs to detect surface effects caused by subsurface resonance.
THIS IS PROBABLY THE MOST IMPORTANT PART 👇
THE GIZA PLATEAU IS GEO-PHYSICALLY UNIQUE!
Limestone and granite are known for their acoustic and piezoelectric properties. Granite contains high quartz content, which responds to mechanical stress by generating electric fields (piezoelectric effect).
Resonant voids deep underground could stimulate mechanical stress in the rock, creating surface-coupled oscillations through the piezoelectric effect.The pyramids’ precise geometry could enhance wave reflection and standing wave formation, essentially acting as a mechanical amplifier for deep resonance.
In other words, Giza’s geology and construction create the ideal conditions for deep mechanical resonance to couple into surface-level oscillations, making them detectable by SAR.
High attenuation and scattering apply to direct EM penetration through rock, but not necessarily to mechanical coupling. Low-frequency seismic waves and standing resonant waves could survive for kilometers underground , depending on the geological structure. If deep voids are geometrically tuned to natural frequencies (like Helmholtz resonators), they could sustain coherent resonant oscillations that transfer energy to the surface.
The surface response could then be detectable as a consistent micro-Doppler shift in SAR. Mechanical resonance propagating through dense rock via piezoelectric coupling bypasses the attenuation problem faced by direct EM waves.
SAR measures backscattered EM waves, not seismic waves, but SAR interferometry (InSAR) is already used to detect micro-scale surface displacements caused by earthquakes and tectonic shifts. The Doppler shift SAR detects would come from the surface deformation caused by deep mechanical resonance, not the resonance itself.
Doppler-based SAR is already sensitive enough to detect:
- Ground deformation caused by magma chamber inflation.
- Tiny tectonic shifts before earthquakes.
- Ocean surface currents and even atmospheric pressure waves.
If SAR can detect these subtle mechanical shifts, it’s plausible that deep resonance-induced surface coupling could register as a Doppler shift. Yes, Doppler-based SAR is sensitive to noise, but consistent, periodic signals are far easier to extract from noise using statistical and signal processing techniques.
If the surface oscillations are tied to a resonant frequency (i.e., consistently repeating over time), they would stand out against random noise.
Inversion algorithms used in seismic tomography and synthetic aperture processing could enhance signal clarity, especially if the source is stable and repeating. If the resonance signal is stable and coherent, modern signal processing techniques could extract it from noise.
InSAR-based geophysics often work without direct calibration, just by comparing phase shifts over time. If Biondi’s SAR-based inversion aligns with known geological data (like seismic tomography or borehole sampling), that would provide indirect validation.
Direct borehole sampling or seismic correlation would strengthen the case, but not having it doesn’t make the signal invalid. If the signal shows consistency across multiple passes and environmental conditions, it strengthens the case for a real underlying cause.
Lack of direct calibration doesn’t invalidate the method, it just requires correlation with independent data.
Revolutionary Implications? Yes, But Feasible in the Context of Giza’s Unique Geology!
Giza’s combination of:
• Resonant granite and limestone.
• Piezoelectric properties.
• Geometric resonance from the pyramids.
• Deep voids acting as Helmholtz resonators.
… creates the perfect environment for this kind of coupling.
The physics of piezoelectric and mechanical resonance coupling are known, what’s groundbreaking is the proposed scale and the ability to detect it using SAR inversion.
Most geological settings lack the piezoelectric and geometric properties present at Giza, so this effect might be site-specific. If confirmed, it could open a new field of planetary-scale geophysics, blending seismology, radar physics, and material science.
If Biondi’s method holds up, it’s not a minor discovery, it’s a paradigm shift in how we understand geophysical coupling, ancient engineering, and subsurface imaging.
Many of the critiques fall apart due to assumptions on the Systems & Methods being deployed, and assuming conventional geophysics, but Giza’s geological, material, and architectural conditions are ANYTHING BUT CONVENTIONAL.
If Biondi’s team can correlate their SAR data with seismic, magnetic, and piezoelectric evidence, they’ll have unlocked a new method for subsurface imaging and possibly uncovered the engineered foundations of the pyramids’ hidden purpose.
@e_galv The creators of those writings certainly had a huge financial and social incentive to devise them. Those were the "influencers" of that era. Trying to get as many followers as they could. I never trusted such self-serving sheisters.
@ProudSocialist Corrected: ...realize how serious the Uniparty is. Unified against us and all of our rights, property, and powers. They're so serious about owning us that their puppet actors can just laugh their asses off together about it.
Two of the biggest and most successful psyops of our time.
A Trojan horse for the liberals and a Trojan horse for the conservatives.
People cut off their families for these men. They claim them as their King and the “best” ruler they’ve ever had.
And they fucking hate you.