@Suchmo83 Interesting. I certainly agree on the mileage front: my research & others shows that reading mileage correlates strongly with high outcomes. With the 1:1 side of things, would I be right in concluding that you're talking particularly about the word reading side of things?
Oh dear - Twitter has got even more political than normal for a minute.
Let's refocus on more important things. Isabelle (age 5) has started a diary about our caravan holiday.
Today's entry: "Aaaa it's morning"
(With apostrophe 🤣)
@Talk4Writing@PieCorbett@JamieThomasTFW
@matthewmoor3@Talk4Writing Certainly - do you want to ping me an email: [email protected]
Julia has also written a book called Talk for Writing in the Secondary School that you might be interested in - it's available in the shop on the website
Why does shared writing matter?
Shared writing on the flip chart has always been a core component of @Talk4Writing. When we write with the children, we can think about language, writerly tools, transcriptional processes and more.
Perhaps far more importantly...
@SarahJP26@PieCorbett@Talk4Writing I dont disagree - but when it's this wrong? Data at my school will change by 10-15% based on the marking reviews. That's huge in a high stakes system
@Suchmo83 Yes sorry, number 2 - just wondered whether there was any data on the effect of 1:1 reading accelerating progress significantly. I've run a tight 1:1 programme for years but progress is more moderate than I'd like so I'm trying to unpick a little
Now Bridget has gone, I can state clearly that I’ve spent the last two years wrestling with the @TheNFER a large charity that evaluates government policy (among other tasks) for its lack of political impartiality. 1/8
@MrJ_Evans@DebbieBowers18@Talk4Writing@JamieThomasTFW I feel like the Victor Meldrew of education. ‘I don’t believe it!’ Constant outsourcing doesn’t work. You need a well funded professional body for curriculum and assessment. You could call it QCA…
@matthewmoor3@Talk4Writing Hi - yes indeed. Julia Strong who is Deputy Director of @Talk4Writing is from a secondary background originally and we've worked with many over the years. I'm currently working with a full Secondary SEN school
Rant cont.
It costs schools to appeal, but schs are not privy to the specialist marker guidance
So schools will pay in good faith, challenging reasonable answers, usually not knowing there’s a secret additional list of acceptable/unacceptable answers they’re not allowed to see
🔊 "We're expected in schools to sort ourselves & be on point...and yet, we have disasters like this" 🔊
Have a listen to Pie's thoughts on the recent SATs marking fiasco in this teaser from our upcoming episode with... a special guest.
@Talk4Writing@PieCorbett@JamieThomasTFW
Pics shared w/ permission. These chn are boundary, and it has been advised by markers (who get specialist guidance) not to appeal as they won’t get the mark
Q2: see “incorrect” answer & mark scheme.
No point appealing bc apparently “pile” doesn’t necessarily mean “large amount”