Seems to all boil down to Integrity, doesn't it? Real Integrity, a deep and profound interest in the truth, or as close as we can get - it starts with doubt....
@EBagnatori@Xentrik85@VWolf83864177 For those with integrity: Watch the ego desperately grab a fragment of a sentence to declare "we're done here."
EB admits the 14.7 psi atmosphere contains the dry ice, completely ignoring that the 14.7 psi atmosphere itself requires a macro-boundary๐
Pure confirmation bias.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Notice the retreat into complex jargon. "E-folding distance" and "dimensional analysis" are mathematical smoke screens to excuse why you cannot physically demonstrate gravity holding gas next to a vacuum in a lab!!
The map is not the territory.
Still waiting on a lab receipt.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori You are using scale to dodge physical mechanics. SMH
If gravity can hold gas openly against a true vacuum, it should be demonstrable in a scaled vertical column with heavy gas.
It isn't.
You demand we match a mathematical parameter because your physics fail in a tangible lab.
@WisenheimuR@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Who asked to build a literal moon?
We asked for a scaled lab demonstration of physical mechanics your model claims are true (like uncontained gas next to a vacuum).
Hiding behind a strawman meme because you lack genuine real-world mechanics for any of them is a cowardly dodge.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori The entire point is you cannot physically prove your premise in any lab on Earth
You treat a theoretical math model as absolute reality because your ego cannot handle the words "I don't know"
In physical, lab-proven reality, gas expanding into a zero-resistance void never stops.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori You claim gravity stops dissipation.
We can test this.
Put gas in a vacuum chamber on Earth.
Does gravity hold it at the bottom, or does it instantly expand to fill the void?
Entropy overpowers gravity in reality.
You are defending a chalkboard theory with ZERO lab receipts.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Which many here clearly do not have!
Watch the ego reframe honesty as a threat...
Asking for lab verification of uncontained gas next to a vacuum is called a "cowardly dodge" because they cannot produce it.
The dishonest mind attacks the questions to avoid the missing answers.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Observation without physical experimentation is just interpretation.
If your interpretation of the sky requires mechanics that fail in every physical lab on Earthโlike water conforming to a curveโyour interpretation is flawed. Obviously.
Asking for physical proof takes courage.
@Xentrik85@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori You actually just proved my premise~inside a container, gases sort by density~Heavy CO_2 sinks in lighter air
But without the macro-container pressing back on it, it violently expands!
Density sorting requires a baseline pressure, which requires a boundary
Show the lab receipts!
@Xentrik85@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Dry ice pooling on a table is not "uncontained" It is pushing against 14.7 psi of atmospheric pressure inside a room.
Put dry ice in a vacuum chamber (zero resistance) and it violently expands everywhere.
You are citing a pressurized environment to prove an uncontained void?? K
@Xentrik85@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori This is why the ancients believed in an enclosed system.
A macro-boundary (rigid or electromagnetic) allows gases to sort into a perfect pressure gradient via density, while preventing the kinetic energy from dissipating into the void.
It is lab-proven, thermodynamic reality.
@Xentrik85@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Wrong
For a gas to lose all kinetic energy and stop expanding into a zero-resistance void, it must reach Absolute Zero (0 Kelvin).
At that point, it freezes into a solid and falls
As long as it is a gas, it expands.
Entropy doesn't magically pause because you ran out of math.
@winowt@Julian_Comment Come on people, seriously, what are people thinking about when they post?? How does that help anyone?
"Watch the documentary"
There are dozens, probably hundreds of documentaries.
Maybe we will find it after 38+ documentaries watched, 90+ hours invested... lol
Incredible
@EBagnatori Zero accountability~ POS
Caught fabricating a quote in his own screenshot, lying AGAIN, he pretends it never happened, retreats to his chalkboard script.
He mathematically calculates force across a boundary, while arguing he doesn't need a physical boundary.
Dishonest evasion.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori Citing a "hydrostatic differential equation" is not a physical lab receipt.
You are pointing to a textbook to prove a textbook.
Math is an abstraction.
In empirical, physical reality, no lab on Earth can demonstrate gravity holding pressurized gas openly next to a true vacuum.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori You claim gravity prevents expansion.
Put heavy gas in a vacuum chamber on Earth.
Does gravity hold it at the bottom, or does kinetic entropy force it to fill the entire void?
Entropy overpowers gravity in every single lab experiment.
Your "body force" theory has no receipts.
@VWolf83864177@EBagnatori If 80,000 kg of gas is escaping, gravity is FAILING to contain it
A system actively losing mass to a void is the DEFINITION of kinetic dissipation.
You just proved my point while trying to defend your missing container.
Show the repeatable lab receipts for these theories...
@EBagnatori Dishonest ~self-own
EB's screenshot explicitly says "ZERO resistance," not "more force" lying POS
You posted the exact evidence proving you fabricated a strawman!!
Meanwhile, you completely ignore the ask for a lab receipt at the bottom of your own picture. Pure projection~RUN