Mr Jones

Seems to all boil down to Integrity, doesn't it? Real Integrity, a deep and profound interest in the truth, or as close as we can get - it starts with doubt....

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@winowt @Julian_Comment Come on people, seriously, what are people thinking about when they post?? How does that help anyone?

"Watch the documentary"

There are dozens, probably hundreds of documentaries.

Maybe we will find it after 38+ documentaries watched, 90+ hours invested... lol

Incredible

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Zero accountability~ POS
Caught fabricating a quote in his own screenshot, lying AGAIN, he pretends it never happened, retreats to his chalkboard script.

He mathematically calculates force across a boundary, while arguing he doesn't need a physical boundary.

Dishonest evasion.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@VWolf83864177 @EBagnatori Citing a "hydrostatic differential equation" is not a physical lab receipt.

You are pointing to a textbook to prove a textbook.

Math is an abstraction.

In empirical, physical reality, no lab on Earth can demonstrate gravity holding pressurized gas openly next to a true vacuum.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@VWolf83864177 @EBagnatori You claim gravity prevents expansion.

Put heavy gas in a vacuum chamber on Earth.

Does gravity hold it at the bottom, or does kinetic entropy force it to fill the entire void?

Entropy overpowers gravity in every single lab experiment.

Your "body force" theory has no receipts.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@VWolf83864177 @EBagnatori If 80,000 kg of gas is escaping, gravity is FAILING to contain it

A system actively losing mass to a void is the DEFINITION of kinetic dissipation.

You just proved my point while trying to defend your missing container.

Show the repeatable lab receipts for these theories...

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Dishonest ~self-own

EB's screenshot explicitly says "ZERO resistance," not "more force" lying POS

You posted the exact evidence proving you fabricated a strawman!!

Meanwhile, you completely ignore the ask for a lab receipt at the bottom of your own picture. Pure projection~RUN

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@VWolf83864177 @EBagnatori For those with integrity: Watch the conditioning in real time.

EB is literally inventing a fake argument ("vacuums suck") because he cannot refute the ACTUAL physics: gas kinetic energy expands infinitely into a zero-resistance void ~ *Law.

He has NO lab receipt, only strawmen.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@VWolf83864177 @EBagnatori I've explicitly stated repeatedly a vacuum provides ZERO resistance.

It does not "suck"

Gas expands because of its own kinetic energy meeting zero opposing matter. Think!

EB literally has to invent cartoon physics to mock because he STILL cannot produce a single lab receipt!!

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Notice the horribly dishonest dodge~EB builds a fake argument ("Mr Jones claims the force is greater") and asks his echo chamber to debunk it

I explicitly said a vacuum has zero physical resistance, causing infinite expansion.
The dishonesty is a shield for his missing evidence.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@dnmeboy @MamaJeanLovesYU @HJarsz @benwehrman Oh great!
Finally someone smart who has repeatable, verifiable lab data that undeniably validates these globe theories that the dumb flat-earthers keep proving false.

Please, enlighten us, we've been waiting decades for the actual verified scientific method.
I'm so excited...

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori People have more than enough information in this thread to research and learn the real, actual, physical, repeatable laws of Thermodynamics, not the EB math versions.

Good luck everyone, hopefully you will find the integrity to question and find more honest answers ~ Peace out ~

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Notice the retreat into insults. When the conditioned ego cannot physically reproduce its worldview on a lab bench, it throws jargon and names like "flerf" to soothe the dissonance

Insults don't build physical lab experiments. You are out of evidence and running on pure emotion.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Let’s end all the disingenuous chalkboard dodging.

Does a vacuum contain physical matter (Area) for gas molecules to collide against and create your static pressure?

Yes or no?

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori So dishonest.
2-1=1 means molecules colliding with molecules. 1-0 means molecules colliding with NOTHING.

Without physical matter to collide against (Area), it is Free Expansion.

Your chalkboard math cannot magically build a physical lid.

Where is the physical lab receipt?

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori And THAT my friends is the BALL GAME

EB: "I'll accept your surrender"

What a completely delusional bot. EB will learn absolutely nothing here, be posting his same corrupt conclusions 5 minutes from now.
Look at his picture, read his words, imagine his life.

Absolutely Hopeless

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori Those with integrity:
There is no "extra force"—there is ZERO RESISTANCE
Push a door with 10lbs while I resist with 9lbs
Now push with 10lbs with nothing there; it flies open violently
A vacuum has zero physical matter to resist kinetic expansion
Static math doesn't stop entropy.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori @_free_f0rever_ YOU make no sense!
Are you capable of answering this without another equation: Do you possess a physical lab experiment demonstrating gas resting next to a vacuum without a solid barrier?

Yes or no?

Answering with more math is an admission that your model only exists on PAPER.

[Mr Jones @MrJonesKustoms]

@EBagnatori @_free_f0rever_ Does a gas molecule at the edge of your gradient have kinetic energy (heat)?

Yes or no?

If yes, it is moving.

What physical barrier stops that kinetic motion from continuing into the void? Think!

You are continuously confusing a math equation with physical, moving molecules.