Puerto-Ricans “second class citizenship” doesn’t stem from differing birthrights, but from location based restrictions. If any other citizen from the mainland moves to PR they will also be restricted from voting. Therefore, every US-Citizen is always a second class citizen and is only “first-class” while residing in the mainland.
- U.S. citizens living in Puerto Rico (regardless of where they were born or previously lived) are not eligible to vote for president in the general election while residing there.
- This applies even if they were previously registered and voting in a mainland state. Moving to Puerto Rico and making it their new voting residence disqualifies them from continuing to vote absentee for president via their old state, because UOCAVA (Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act) protections for absentee voting typically cover citizens abroad or military personnel, not those who move to a U.S. territory like Puerto Rico.
@MonologgueSSB@sir_saku@JoshEakle Nice one. Take a look again smart guy, answer me this, how did he fire the initial shot if his gun was in the holster?
Prediction of the court verdict for the man named Decarlos Brown Jr that stabbed 23 year old Ukrainian woman, Iryna Zariska on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina. Will he get the d**th penalty or life in prison? What does he deserve?
Yet African Americans use both freely nowadays. Anyone else will receive prejudice from the black community by saying either of the two words. In our society a black man will let you use the word if they like you, if they don’t or stop liking you then it’s justifiable for them to do harm to you for using that word, which they will use while beating you up. Do agree that this is true, and if so do you see the issue?
🇻🇪🇵🇷MADURO: I'LL FREE PUERTO RICO WITH THE HELP OF BRAZILIAN TROOPS
"Just like in the north they have an agenda of colonization, we have an agenda of liberation.
And our agenda was written by Simón Bolívar. The freedom of Puerto Rico is pending.
We will achieve it with Brazilian troops."
Source: Metrópoles, La Derecha Diario
@LasVegasSun They lie, what are the odds that the video glitched in two seperate occasions to make the carabiner “look broken.” Sounds like a blatant coverup
Social acceptance means people feel safe to be open. What we’re seeing now goes beyond that, it’s targeted messaging toward kids who haven’t even questioned their identity. When every classroom, cartoon, and streaming show adds a “gender journey” arc, it stops being acceptance of those who already are, and becomes exposure designed to spark self-questioning in those who wouldn’t have otherwise.
You asked for evidence, watch this video. Here, the cross-dressing child is giving a crash course101 to a group of kids on “holiday self expression,” with the suggestive phrase “you don’t need to look scary” and showing off his dress and pearls.
Let’s compare this example to Religion, different faiths are socially accepted, but we don’t make children’s cartoon featuring a non-christian (Muslim, Jewish, etc) child teaching a “crash course” to other kids on why they “don’t have to be Christian.” That wouldn’t be inclusion, it would be persuasion. The same line exists here.
WTF. This is a scene from a movie on @Netflix called "Strawberry Shortcake and the Beast of Berry Bog"
It promotes boys crossdressing as girls to "express" themselves.
This show is recommended for CHILDREN of ALL AGES.
CANCEL NETFLIX
@ToppleTyranny@Becky_Weiss_ To show inclusion is to tell someone you are still whole if this describes you. To promote is to tell others you could or should be this too. Messaging has shifted toward proactive visibility in children’s TV, media, and schools. It’s no longer inclusion; it’s social recruitment.
@TranscendentEva@cb_doge If no agenda targets our children to become transgender, why has the rate of NEWLY recorded trans children (13-15 & 16-17) SKYROCKETED past the rate of NEWLY AND PREVIOUSLY DOCUMENTED trans adults?Promoting identity comfort ≠ pushing identity ideology (Like candy for kids).
@darren_stallcup Simple, because in a perfect scenario he would attract almost 77 million more viewers = more $$$. He is the outlier to bring in more people who normally don’t attend or watch the superbowl. Capitalism doesn’t care about your feelings, it cares about profit.