If the blinkered pro-Palestine crowd want to talk about ‘genocide’, they should start with Israel’s murdered mothers and mutilated children:
"You want genocide? OK, read the pathologists’ reports. A girl, around five years old, who has been shot through her body from her skull to the soles of her feet. A 12-year-old girl shot in the head and then decapitated. Teenagers who received a video on their phones of their petrified grandmother as she was about to be executed (Hamas got a kick from sharing their work).
Young women at the Nova peace festival, half-naked, strung up from trees the better to defile them. Vaginas rammed with knives and bottles. Twin baby boys, their mother slaughtered in the kitchen fetching milk for them, their father riddled with bullets as he struggled to keep the door of the safe room shut; the orphaned babies used as bait for 14 hours, little Guy and Roi, 10 months old, left to scream so they would lure neighbours to rescue them and those brave souls were then picked off by the terrorists lying in wait. I stood outside that house on Kibbutz Kfar Aza imagining all too well the panic of parents unable to protect their children; the number of bodies recovered was chalked on the wall. Yes, but…
Killing parents in front of their sobbing children, then setting the house on fire so those children are burnt alive and all that remains of that beautiful family is cremated remains. Can we at least agree that goes beyond the bounds of “wrong” to a place we haven’t quite got a name for? “Evil” feels too small a word. For three years, I’ve been struggling to find the words; some way, at least, of expressing what happened. Because I believe it should matter to anyone who cares about our civilisation; make no mistake, the foul fiends responsible will come for us all if we let them.
“They don’t just hate Jews, Allison, they hate freedom. They hate life.” That was Meirav Gonan, who I met in Tel Aviv after her daughter Romi was abducted at the Nova festival (Romi was held hostage for 471 days in Gaza). One thing I do know: the stories of suffering are seared on my soul. Yes, but…
And it was all deliberate, that carnival of cruelty. On October 7, 2023, Hamas did not just seek a military victory over the IDF soldiers at the border posts. They wanted to provoke Israel into a retaliation that would scupper any chance of an imminent peace accord with Saudi Arabia, which would thwart Iran’s ambitions in the region. So they used civilians as playthings to torture, humiliate, defile (even carrying helpful translations to instruct women to undress). Yes, but…
Who can forget one of the defining images of that day’s barbarity? Twenty-two-year-old German-Israeli Shani Louk, her body chucked on the back of a flatbed truck like a sack of potatoes, her leg obscenely twisted at a right angle, one of her murderers casually resting his boot on her naked flank. That beautiful young woman was a trophy of war, her corpse paraded through Gaza to the frenzied delight of the mob. Only a splinter of Shani’s skull was ever recovered. Yes, but…
Shame on every single person who marches on October 7 – they celebrate the suffering of families cremated in their own homes, of Shani Louk paraded as a spoil of war, of a mother murdered when she went to fetch milk for her babies. Roi and Guy, the twins, now four years old, are thriving. The aunt and uncle who adopted them don’t want the boys to be tragic figures. Like their country, they have to be resilient. They love life.
I am not Jewish, but I believe the Jews deserve and need a homeland. I hate their enemies because they are our enemies. So that makes me a Zionist. If you have any sense of where history teaches us, this leads you should be a Zionist too. No more “Yes, buts…”
Today of all days let us stand with our Jewish brothers and sisters."
-Allison Pearson, The Telegraph
After the Green Party's "Zionism is Racism" vote, the Leader of Haringey Council, which is controlled by the Greens, wrote to various Synagogues in the borough to "reassure" them.
I want to show you Highgate Synagogue's reply. I believe it is worth reading in its entirety.
Never forget. In late 2023 I watched the 45-minute (started as 47) video of Hamas atrocities committed on October 7. Almost entirely made up of Hamas recorded footage they wanted the world to see. It was traumatizing. I spent 6 hours sitting in front of my computer not knowing what to say about the evil I had just watched. This was my post:
In case anyone in the government gives a flying fuck what I, as a rape survivor, think, I want all fighting age men who arrived to this country illegaly to be immediately deported. Failing that, I want to see every fucker who facilitated this, convicted of public endangerment.
How will you decide who gets a payout? Will you DNA test all UK taxpayers and work out their family lineage to see if they are descendants of slave owners? Will you also ensure that black people are investigated to see if they descend from slave traders?
Will there be any acknowledgement of the huge cost, both financial & cost of life, we paid by ending slavery?
I'm brown. Will I have to pay reparations on behalf of my white family? Will I get a payout on behalf of my black family?
Please let us know how this will work? We all know it is one huge grift. Every race, religion, creed was involved in slavery. Will we be holding Africans to account too?
Soft voice, long hair, short skirt, makeup
I don’t think the media quite understand how creepy and intimidating these skinwalkers appear to women irl, let alone in intimate spaces
These are men @Channel4News
Which other law-breaking paraphiliacs will you be interviewing today?
@BMLSTHolder Odious attention seeker with no knowledge or interest in the game learns about actual fans for the first time. Even more fascinating is the gimpy fanboy sidekick, he gets to feel big whilst simping for the school bully. Please get them out of football.
It is the day after #GigglevTickle and I haven’t woken up believing that men can be women. You can try & punish me for not believing it, but you can never make me believe it.
Men cannot be women.
"No, I don't subscribe to this 'kindness' - I'll tell the truth instead."
I spoke at the Cambridge Union last night about LGBs, children's safety and women's rights. Full video here:
Bravo, @Keir_Starmer, for getting in an Adviser on Women and Girls who thinks the definition of women and girls includes men and boys. That'll definitely win back people who believe Labour's a party for smug, lanyard-wearing, luxury-belief-espousing cultural elitists. 1/2
So disgusted by this…
Worked with Maureen in 2015 on a play, in Birmingham & London, & there were concerns for her safety even then.
This abysmally foul & downright dangerous attempt to demonise & cancel her should outrage & sicken us all.
Arts: SPEAK UP & OUT!
RT 🙏
“It’s not the first time in history artists have faced oppression and it won’t be the last.
We should support each other, come together and defend our shared space, our territory, the place where imagination can roam free.
Because if they come for one of us they will eventually come for all. “
On Monday 26/4/26 I gave a speech at the House of Lords, Palace of Westminster to help launch https://t.co/2YhLCM1V7m
Please follow/donate to @Freedom_in_Arts they are doing VITAL work for all of us.”
🧵
Some records capture a moment. Some capture a place. A rare few manage both, and somehow, impossibly, they capture you too, right there within the grooves.
When The Good, the Bad & the Queen was released, I belonged to London, an exile absorbed into a city that’s always been a haven for waifs and strays. Feeling that low-level crackle in the air. Sliding in and out of pubs. All in a bad man’s dream. Friday night in the Kingdom of Doom, Sunday’s lost in melancholy. The city around me slowly shifting as each pint settled. Long shadows and high hopes.
This album didn’t just document London, it felt like London. The great city was alive like no other. Thrilling. Beautiful. Restless. Yet also decaying. Withering. The cranes were moving on the skyline, trying to knock down this town. Pre-crash, mid-war, post-7/7. Money pouring in. Soul draining out. An uncertain moment without purpose. He not busy being born is busy dying. London is constantly doing both.
The album held that paradox. There’s a sepia-toned music hall quality to it, echoes of Victorian theatres and imperial hangovers, married to modern rhythms that feel loose and global. A gaslight circus soundtracked by satellite signals. Past and present bleed into one another. It’s vast yet can suffocate, like the tied end town it mythologises. Like watching the Thames at dusk, the sound is never static, always moving.
🧵
WARNING: Don't feed the autogynephiles
Here's what's interesting about this post by @BriannaWu.
He suggests that the guy in the dress who shot up the school in Canada was just a fetishistic crossdresser who was experimenting with a female identity publicly -- not a real "trans girl" like him.
This is to create the illusion that there are two distinct categories of straight men who wear women's clothes in public. Wu is the actual sufferer of transness; the other guy is just some horny dude who wears skirts n' heels for masturbation purposes.
But they are not discrete categories of men. They are men with the same paraphilia, and what looks to the outsider like different "kinds" is actually different *phases* of the same compulsion. The specificities of the compulsion are also different but it's the same thing.
These men have to decide to lean in to the compulsion, or find alternative ways of dealing with it. Many autogynephiles never take it public. Wu has gone all in on it, however, which is a sign that the compulsion is very strong with him. He also seems kind of naturally sociopathic, and he's a known compulsive liar (as we say here in TERFlandia -- "they're not just men, they're the worst men").
I repeat: what you think is different types of trans is actually just different phases of the same sexual compulsion.
This explains how the ye olde distinction between "transsexual" and "transvestite" came about. The former were so tormented by their compulsion that they asked to be castrated. The latter got there eventually, or not at all, depending on how much they indulged. They dip their toe, then lower themselves in. Wu is fully submerged.
That's why they so often refer to it as a "gender journey". Wu is passing through a particular phase of the autgynephile's gender journey. The Tumbler Ridge guy was experiencing another, much earlier, phase. That's what Wu is accidentally revealing in this post.
Wu knows better than anybody that it is the experimenting with the identity that makes the "dysphoria" more intense. It locks in the identity via repetition and "relief".
He himself definitely started his gender journey the same way. They all do. They do it occasionally for wanks, eventually fail to get high, take it public, need more, and more, and more. The struggle is real.
Eventually the "distress" gets so intense that they start calling themselves "trans women".
On this journey, the final destination is Brianna Wu types: grossly disfigured males dressed up as their favourite porn genre (this is the bit where they're high) and eventually, a sexless old lump of a bloke trying desperately to keep the flame and the fantasy alive. Look at Bruce Jenner. He's come down.
All the Daves crash to earth eventually. Wu is currently up, and he's trying desperately hard to stay there. That requires your input.
Don't be fooled into thinking that because Wu is "topped" on the regular by a man (he's married to bloke who doesn't publicly crossdress) that he's "one of the gay ones";. The autogynephile fantasy is a masochistic fantasy. He wants to be a "gaping hole", to act out the "disempowering" role of a submissive, lowly woman.
He's a creep, and he's trying to maintain this false distinction between real trans and crossdressers in order to ensure you obey the rules in his personal sexual fantasy arena. The man just got half his jaw and chin surgically removed to get the next "high".
Even if you don't give a shit about women's rights, you should know that you're feeding this creep scraps of wank fodder every time you call him "she".
Don't feed the autogynephiles.
These morons want every acre of land covered in solar panels imported from China, using materials mined in the Congo using children. Cornwall is flooded - not because of climate change, but because fields that were once full of trees and farming, absorbing gallons of rain water, are now covered in thousands of concrete new build monstrosities, solar panels and windmills. The rivers aren't dredged, there is litter EVERYWHERE since the council started "recycling", and all the drains are blocked and not maintained.
Meanwhile they want us to process bovier in factories to create products that stop cow farts - a perfectly natural gas - and instead eat ultra processed foods from Peru, India and China and import them thousands of miles from around the world.
Its not climate change, it's just utter stupidity.
And I consider your pretense of womanhood to be a defamation of every woman on the planet.
These are both pictures of you. One is your heavily curated profile picture. I can only guess how many filters you have applied to it. The other is unfiltered. The dates of the photographs in question are irrelevant: the picture on the right is what you looked like before your very expensive cosmetic surgeries.
In short, it is the real you, and is what you would still look like if you hadn’t paid a surgeon tens of thousands of dollars to chop off a chunk of your massive jaw. It is the truth of you, and truth is not defamatory, no matter what kind of mantrum you may have unblocked me - and then reblocked me - to throw in my comment section.
You are a colonizer, John - and you are a man. You and your fellow invaders appropriate female culture, strip women of the very words we use to identify ourselves -a traditional colonizers’ theft – and do your best to aid in the reduction of womanhood itself to a commodity that is bought and sold so that you, a man, can purchase it. You’re the trans version of Rachel Dolezal. You all are.
Oh, and you love to rub your “purchase” in the faces of real women, endlessly reminding us of the fact that you and your fellows have done everything in your power to reduce us to a thing. You have stolen the word “woman” from us, and attacked us for not wanting to be identified by a modifier your community privately uses as a slur. I bet y’all get a big laugh out of that one any time some poor deluded ally calls herself “c*s.”
It is deeply dishonest of you to pretend that the five-figure, drastic surgical procedures which altered your face have somehow transformed you into a woman, or in any way changed the fact that you are an enormous, hate-filled, deeply dangerous man who gets off on the pain he’s causing.
The women whose rights you trample on daily have the right to be reminded — and to remind the world — exactly what the men who invade our spaces _are_ beneath your surgical alterations, your womanface minstrel show performances, and your carefully angled and heavily filtered photographs.
You’re selling a lie, John — a damaging, vicious, misogynistic lie that helps other men to sexually abuse women and girls all across the Western world. I couldn’t care less if you feel defamed by your own picture.
The UK is one of few countries that recognises the concept of coercive control.
Women (except if they're partnered to transvestites - see attached article), have protections in the home from being intimidated, bullied, abused, punished and frightened by their partners.
However, those very same women only have to go out to work and they are subject to what is effectively the same pattern of coercive and controlling behaviours, only this time, being carried out by their employers.
I am calling this practice Employer-Initiated Coercive Control (EICC).
Which I define as:
'A pattern of rules enacted by employers which compel (invariably) female employees to change or adapt their behaviours in order to accede to the principles of gender ideology.'
EICC includes:
Being forced to use aberrant pronouns.
Being forced to share toilets and changing facilities with men.
Being forced to use pronouns in one's email signature.
Being forced to announce one's pronouns at meetings.
Being forced to wear pride (no capitals) lanyards and other paraphernalia.
Being forced to wear ID badges that include pronouns.
EICC falls most heavily on women.
It forces women to deny the reality of their own eyes.
It forces women into degradation and fear.
It creates a hostile working environment for women.
Furthermore, EICC is sex-based discrimination because it requires, nay demands, that women turn off vital threat-recognition systems that have developed over millions of years of evolution.
These threat recognition systems alert us to danger. Any woman reading this is able to do so probably because a distant (or recent), female ancestor listened to her inner voice and got herself safely away from what she recognised as a dangerous or predatory man.
But now we women are being told that no male can be a danger to us simply because he is wearing a dress, or makeup, or has grown his hair long. Or, that because he 'identifies' as a 'woman'.
Everyone knows this is complete nonsense (including employers). They are just too frightened of being labelled 'transphobic', so they instead choose to intimidate, bully, abuse, punish and frighten their female employees.
Women are protected from coercive control in the home.
Women, likewise, now need to be protected from Employer-Initiated Coercive Control when they are going about their duties in the workplace.