We want to make it easier for athletic trainers in ALL SETTINGS to implement the new recommendations outlined in the new #EAPPS. Help us out by taking this quick survey (and get entered to win a gift card by participating!) https://t.co/TyolBm7ZSa
@katemsaylor Yes. When I talked with my supervisor about this she asked if they were trying to make it harder for people to engage, and honestly it seems like they are.
The WVU Division of Athletic Training is hiring for a Chair faculty position. Come work with us, we are trying to do some really cool things 😎 ! https://t.co/S4yA8cntjV
@carrieprice78 My #socialscience reviews have been #ScopingReviews, so I've done Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and Social Work Abstracts. Sometimes PubMed if the team's sentinel articles are indexed there.
Props to the grad student who ended their email requesting a library consultation for help with their research proposal with, "I don't know where to start and I'm really stressed out." We should all own this instead of trying to pretend we aren't freaking out over the hard things
@Llipke3 @LibJuiceAcademy@msjennmo actually wrote a great blog post about this recently. Her experience with Mastodon and Discord are similar to my own. https://t.co/j5kAFWljE6
And therefore cited in those same publications. Not to mention better term selection makes for higher recall (and therefore more citations!). Ask me how I know
#medlibs#canmedlibs#sysrevlibs (2/2)
@LibrarianJaded I tell the teams I work with that I will not start drafting the searches until the protocol is finished, minimum of the in/exclusion criteria & anything else related to the search finalized. This second part is non-negotiable to me, though I will do some preliminary searches.
Many #evidencesyntheses unreliable partly b/c their clinician-authors "resort to familiar but often inadequate, inappropriate, or obsolete methods and tools and, as a result, produce unreliable reviews."
https://t.co/O16MM5Y28G
I agree. Solution = involve methodologists.