Mandi

[Spookd Blog @SpookdBlog]

What a surprise!

When will 0bama be charged with insurrection, money laundering, and Treason?

[Scotty Mar10 @Allenma15086871]

https://t.co/tHeR0YbTA8
https://t.co/MNYKjpinhI
PayPal MrsScottyMar10
Shaylene Martin P.O. Box 176 Copperas Cove Tx, 76522

[Attorney General Ken Paxton @KenPaxtonTX]

“Vote for Ken Paxton on Tuesday, HE WILL NEVER LET YOU DOWN!!!”

Thank you, Mr. President!

Texas, make sure to get out and vote on Tuesday, May 26!

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

I am weeping for our nation today. I realize that everyone think free speech 🎤 is key- but influence operations are deployed so hard right now and the alliances of those that are working against transparency and truth and muting real truth. @realDonaldTrump tap me in.

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

Hmmm so my sources at the Colorado Gov office state her clemency was conditional on her admitting she was wrong. Take that as you wish. If she fired them - she would have been home mid April with my team of attorneys. Travesty.

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

Lots of geniuses are smeared by losers that have networks - it’s the only reason Edison stole Teslas work and mocked him concurrently. Still happens today.

[Falcon Sight @falcon_sight_]

This is a compilation of some of the actions that Tore Maras (@idontexistTore) has highlighted in her recent series which people can take to free humanity. Tore’s articles must be read and understood, this is just a summary. The actions are direct quotes from Tore’s articles.

Most of these don’t take much time to do, and the effect will change the world. From experience, once you take an action such as these, others become easier and you realize that you are having a direct effect on what happens in the world.

All credit goes to Tore, and everyone who wants a future for the next generations should read her articles, and take action.

#SpectatorOrParticipant

Actions from “Inside Job” (The actions are direct quotes from Tore’s articles.)

Inside Job, Part I: https://t.co/6Pte5lBf5o

Part I: If you are a current or former federal employee who attended the April 15, 2026 Jitsi call, or similar coalition calls, and you want to contribute documentation to this investigation: secure contact information is available at https://t.co/GMhs7lYntv. All communications will be protected.

Part I: If you are a congressional staffer with materials from the February 4, 2026 Federal Workforce Caucus launch briefing — or subsequent coordination meetings with Branch4, FWAD, FUN, or the Democracy Renewal Group — the public interest in what was promised and to whom outweighs any internal confidentiality expectation. Secure contact at https://t.co/GMhs7lYntv.

Part I: If you are a participant in the coalition who has reached the limit of your comfort with where the operation has traveled — you have options that do not end your career. Office of Special Counsel whistleblower protections exist. Inspector General channels exist. Legal counsel, with privilege, exists. The record has a place for your testimony.

Inside Job, Part II: https://t.co/1ZHA0l1b3N

Part II: Current federal employees participating in organized efforts to obstruct executive function can be addressed through Hatch Act enforcement (Office of Special Counsel), § 7311 enforcement, adverse personnel actions, and — where applicable — § 371 conspiracy exposure.

Part II: Specific unlawful acts embedded within the coalition's training curricula — jury nullification coaching that induces perjury during voir dire is the nearest example — can be prosecuted as § 1503 obstruction or § 1621 perjury where facts support it.

Part II: State-employed officials (sitting Texas Ethics Commissioner Strama, sitting New Jersey State Treasury economist Green-Armytage, sitting state-university faculty) are subject to each state's ethics, conflict-of-interest, and political-activity rules. State-level enforcement is distributed and under-utilized, but it is available in every state where a coalition figure currently holds government employment.

Part II: Congressional oversight — particularly by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, the House Oversight Committee, and the House Foreign Affairs Committee — can subpoena records, compel testimony, and make the aggregated record publicly visible. Public visibility is itself an enforcement mechanism.

Part II: IRS enforcement of § 501(c)(3) political-activity rules, § 501(c)(4) primary-purpose rules, and fiscal-sponsor reporting obligations is available. It is slow and primarily civil, but it is available.

Part II: Foreign-funding and foreign-entanglement review under FARA and related statutes remains available if specific evidence of foreign principal direction surfaces.

Part II: Professional-conduct review for bar-admitted attorneys participating in the coalition's legal-defense infrastructure (Democracy Forward, Rule of Lawyers) is available through state bar disciplinary processes where conduct crosses ethical lines.

Inside Job, Part IV: https://t.co/V8BnCgxWkG

Part IV: 1. File Information with the Office of Congressional Conduct (Go to https://t.co/yFPh46oPgB and follow the instructions under "Submit a Submission." You do not need a lawyer. You do not need to file under oath. You can file anonymously if you choose — though named submissions carry more weight.)

Part IV: 2. File with the Committee on House Administration (How to reach them: House Committee on Administration, 1309 Longworth House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515. Phone: [phone]. Web: https://t.co/v9couHu9BQ.)

Part IV: 3. File with the Communications Standards Commission (https://t.co/v9couHu9BQ contains the commission's contact information under "Communications Standards Commission.")

Part IV: 4. File with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (https://t.co/uJl0mJUTLb. Phone: [phone]. Complaint form: https://t.co/0FSA9CHLNg)

Part IV: 5. File with the Relevant Agency Inspector General (https://t.co/hTA0kVKOus is the centralized hub of all federal IGs with a searchable directory and complaint submission forms)

Part IV: 6. Contact Your Own Senators and Representatives (The single most politically effective act you can take as a private citizen is to write a paper letter — a physical letter, not an email — to your own member of Congress, naming specifically what the Federal Workforce Caucus is doing, naming the CMO rules and House Rule XXIII provisions you believe are implicated, and asking whether your member supports a formal Ethics Committee inquiry. ... If your member is on the caucus, tell them you want them off the caucus. If your member is not on the caucus, tell them you want them to formally request the Committee on House Administration open a rule-compliance inquiry. Keep it factual. Keep it calm. Keep it short. Name specific public conduct and specific rules. A one-page letter is more effective than a five-page letter. Keep a copy for your files.)

Part IV: 7. Read the Statement of Disbursements and Publish What You Find (https://t.co/88V5o8Z7cD; Publish what you find. Submit it to the OCC. Submit it to the CHA. Put it in the public record.)

Part IV: 8. Audit the Caucus Members' Campaign Finance Reports on https://t.co/yxfRPColWY (This is the single highest-leverage research project you can do as a private citizen. ... searchable public database at https://t.co/eh8L2L9f0T; https://t.co/G5Cx9eFFlB; Pick one caucus member. Pull their last four quarterly FEC filings from https://t.co/eh8L2L9f0T or https://t.co/G5Cx9eFFlB. Export the itemized contributor list to a spreadsheet. Sort by employer field.)

Ask: How many contributors list Democracy Forward, Partnership for Public Service, Arabella Advisors, Tides Center, Community Change, Center for American Progress, NEO Philanthropy, Wellspring Philanthropic Fund, or any named fiscal-sponsor entity as their employer?

How many contributors list themselves as federal employees and give amounts that, in combination with official caucus advocacy work, could implicate the Hatch Act?

How many donations came in during "ActBlue surge" periods — post-event, post-press-release, post-coordinated-action windows — when coordinated giving is most likely?

Are there clusters of donations from out-of-district ZIP codes associated with coalition headquarters (D.C. 20001-20009, 20036, 20037)?

One citizen, with a spreadsheet and a weekend, can produce the employer-field map for a single caucus member. A network of citizens, each taking one member, can produce the employer-field map for all twenty-five in a single weekend. That map — published on a website, submitted to the OCC, submitted to the House Administration Committee, sent to the Federal Election Commission — becomes the factual record that investigations are built on.

Inside Job, Part VI: https://t.co/gyPcojDFYi

Part VI: 1. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer — Every 990, Free, Searchable (https://t.co/f1NA1lBfgO; You can pull the filings, read the Schedule I itemized-grants list, and see the names and amounts of every publicly-reported grant made by each entity.)

Part VI: 2. The IRS Exempt Organizations Tip Line (The referral form is IRS Form 13909 (Tax-Exempt Organization Complaint Referral), available at https://t.co/vmwysfqO2o.)

Part VI: 3. The Federal Election Commission — Complaint Process (With a Major Caveat) (https://t.co/ckgv37cukW. The FEC accepts complaints from any person alleging violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act. [Caveat: As of this writing in April 2026, the Federal Election Commission does not have a policymaking quorum. Filing an FEC complaint today is still worth doing — because complaints filed during quorum loss enter the record, start the clock running on staff-level review, and position the complaint for Commission action once a quorum is eventually restored])

Part VI: 4. Your State Attorney General — Charitable Trusts Division (A formal complaint letter citing specific evidence from the Form 990 filings, addressed to the Charitable Trusts Division of the relevant AG's office, becomes part of the institutional record.)

Part VI: 5. The House Ways and Means Committee — Already Investigating (The Committee accepts whistleblower information and tips from the public at https://t.co/YPWA3hbr5k.)

Part VI: 6. The Senate Finance Committee — Tax-Exempt Oversight Jurisdiction

Part VI: 7. Read the 990s — Publish What You Find (The single most high-leverage citizen research project for this architecture is to systematically read and publish findings from the Form 990 filings of the entities documented in this piece. ... A network of ten citizens, each taking one entity, can produce the full 2024 grants-list map of the entire fiscal-sponsor ecosystem in a single weekend. Publish the results. Put the data on a website. Submit it to the OCC, the CHA, the IRS, the FEC, the House Ways and Means Committee, the Senate Finance Committee, and your state attorney general.)

Actions from “OGAN” (The actions are direct quotes from Tore’s articles.)

OGAN , Part I: https://t.co/sSlG53TbuB

Part I: IRS Exempt Organizations Division (Does OGAN's fiscal sponsorship of FWAD exceed the boundaries of its filed charitable purpose? Does the Schedule I on its most recent 990 disclose FWAD at all, and if so, how is it described? Does the Schedule F disclose the foreign-activity structure implied by the published SWIFT rail?)

Part I: California Attorney General — Registry of Charitable Trusts (The Registry has authority to audit, require restated filings, and initiate revocation proceedings.)

Part I: House Ways and Means Committee (Tax-Exempt Oversight) (The fiscal-sponsor shell structure, where climate nonprofits front federal-worker political organizing under undisclosed Schedule I line items, is a category of abuse Congress can hold hearings on regardless of whether DOJ moves.)

Part I: House Administration Committee / Senate Judiciary Committee (The Pompi slide deck, delivered under FWAD's banner and therefore under OGAN's tax-exempt umbrella, is the evidentiary core of the Hatch Act and federal-election-law questions. These committees have both investigative and oversight tools to compel testimony and document production.)

Part I: Office of Special Counsel (The written electoral task assignments to federal employees in the Pompi deck — voter registration, GOTV, poll working, election observation, candidate campaigning — are the exact categories of activity OSC investigates when conducted by covered federal employees in their official capacities.)

Part I: U.S. Attorney's Office — Northern District of California (Any SPLC-style donor-fraud or false-statements-to-a-bank theory would venue there. The U.S. Attorney's Office is the referral destination once a predicate is established.)

Part I: Department of Justice National Security Division — FARA Unit (The predicate question is whether foreign money is in the pipe. The SWIFT rail is, at minimum, an invitation for it to be, and OGAN's 2022 Schedule F confirms a $30,000 wire to Europe for "climate campaign")

OGAN, Part II: https://t.co/bZLyx2Aoq3

Part II: IRS Exempt Organizations — priority escalation (The 94.6-percent-to-c4 finding moves this from a discretionary-review posture into a priority-queue posture. A 501(c)(3) moving nearly all its domestic grant dollars into 501(c)(4) political organizations is precisely the fact pattern the EO Division is designed to flag. Add the Part IV Line 3 "No" contradiction and the Schedule L non-disclosure around Rising Tide, and the referral carries three independent predicates rather than one.)

Part II: California Attorney General Registry of Charitable Trusts (The California AG has authority to audit OGAN's records directly, compel production of the grant restriction agreements and end-of-term reports, and require a restated Form 990 if disclosures are found deficient.)

Part II: Office of Special Counsel — expanded theory (if any of the direct-action activity funded by OGAN's $296,000 grant to Climate Defiance Action involved federal employees participating in their official capacities — voter registration drives, GOTV operations, or candidate-pressure actions conducted on federal time — OSC's jurisdiction attaches to that activity as well)

Part II: New: Treasury Department Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) (a sufficient predicate for FinCEN review of the correspondent banking relationship between PNC Bank and Beneficial State Bank)

Part II: The next set of document pulls, in order of likely yield: FWAD's own Form 990, OGAN's 2024 Form 990, Banking disclosures — Beneficial State Bank and PNC correspondent records, DAF grant reports, Internal grant agreements)

Actions from “The Fauci Files” (The actions are direct quotes from Tore’s articles.)

The Fauci Files, Part III: https://t.co/7J7BilsCAs

Part III: Avenue 1: Constituent Engagement with Congress (The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic referred specific individuals to the Department of Justice for further investigation in November 2024. Constituents may contact their House Representative and Senators about the status of those referrals; the House Judiciary Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee, which exercise direct oversight of DOJ; and the House Oversight Committee, which has continuing jurisdiction over the executive-branch agencies involved.)

Part III: Avenue 2: State Attorneys General Complaint Mechanisms (Citizens may file consumer-protection complaints with their state AG offices and submit information to AG offices conducting pandemic-related investigations.)

Part III: Avenue 3: State Medical Board Complaints (Citizens whose family members were administered Emergency Use Authorization products without informed consent — the structural failure documented in Part I of this series — may file complaints with the relevant state medical board against the specific physicians involved.)

Part III: Avenue 4: Hospital Accreditation and CMS Complaints (Both accept complaints from patients and family members about hospital conduct, including informed-consent failures and protocol violations.)

Part III: Avenue 5: HHS Office of Inspector General Hotline (Citizens with documentation of grant compliance failures, misuse of federal pandemic-era funds, or related fraud may submit complaints to the OIG.)

Part III: Avenue 6: False Claims Act Qui Tam Relator Actions (The framework requires a relator with non-public information — typically an insider, a healthcare worker, a former employee, or a contractor with documentary evidence not yet disclosed in public investigation.)

Part III: Avenue 7: State Constitutional Remedies (Several states have constitutional provisions protecting individual medical autonomy that operate independently of federal frameworks.)

Part III: Avenue 8: Citizen Petitions to FDA and CDC (Both agencies operate formal citizen petition processes. FDA citizen petitions under 21 C.F.R. § 10.30 may request specific regulatory action.)

Part III: Avenue 9: State Legislative Engagement (Citizens may engage state legislators directly on pandemic-era accountability questions, and state legislative records become part of the documentary record that subsequent investigations and litigation may rely upon.)

Part III: Avenue 10: Documentation, Preservation, and Public Record (The least formal but, in the long arc, often most consequential. Citizens who maintain documentary records of pandemic-era hospital conduct, who preserve medical records and consent forms, who interview family members of decedents, who write up their experiences with documentary care — that documentation is what makes investigative journalism, future litigation, and future Congressional inquiry possible.)

The Fauci Files, Part IV: https://t.co/UbHyDgZtFI

Part IV: Avenue A — Federal Communications Commission Complaints (FCC's Consumer Inquiries and Complaints Division)

Part IV: Avenue B — Federal Trade Commission Complaints (FTC's consumer protection division. State Attorneys General with concurrent consumer-protection authority may also receive such complaints under their own state statutes.)

Part IV: Avenue C — Civil Litigation Under State Consumer Protection Statutes (Individuals who relied on pharmaceutical industry advertising claims, or on legacy media coverage that incorporated such claims without independent verification, may have actionable claims under applicable state law.)

Part IV: Avenue D — FOIA Litigation on Government-Platform Communications (The CDC, FDA, HHS, CISA, the White House Office of Digital Strategy, the Surgeon General's office, and other federal entities maintained records of their communications with social-media platforms during the pandemic period.)

Part IV: Avenue E — Antitrust Complaints Regarding Media Coordination (The Department of Justice Antitrust Division and the FTC's Bureau of Competition share federal antitrust enforcement authority. ... Citizens may submit antitrust complaints regarding documented coordination among media organizations that, in their structural effect, restrain competition from independent journalism.)

Part IV: Avenue F — State Public Records Requests on State-Government Coordination (The California Department of Public Health's documented login access to the Virality Project's Jira system, and analogous state-level coordination documented in other states, can be examined through state public-records requests.)

Part IV: Avenue G — Independent Media Support and Documentation (Substack, Rumble, Locals, and other distribution platforms have become the operational infrastructure of independent investigative journalism on pandemic-related accountability questions. Reader support of independent journalism is, in the structural architecture documented in this Part, the operational counterweight to the financial relationships documented in the Pharmaceutical Advertising section of this article.)

Part IV: Avenue H — Documentation of Personal Experience with Platform Suppression (Individual users who experienced platform suppression of accurate medical information during the pandemic period — including discussions of vaccine adverse events, of treatment alternatives, of the lab-origin hypothesis subsequently substantiated by multiple intelligence agencies, of mandate-related concerns — possess primary documentary evidence relevant to ongoing federal litigation and Congressional investigation. Documentation of specific suppression incidents, with screenshots, timestamps, and platform communications preserved, contributes to the documentary record that subsequent litigation, journalism, and oversight may rely upon.)

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

America 250 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

https://t.co/Alr4YoHRWY

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

So this is not weird at all?
Influencers now endorsing 🐧
WTF

[Texas Attorney General @TXAG]

Attorney General Ken Paxton Investigates Southern Poverty Law Center for Funding the Violent Extremist Groups That It Claimed to Oppose: https://t.co/zd61Xbcagi

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

https://t.co/C8pMENxyBP

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

Why? They didn't like your report about us reducing intelligence on the field and that when asked about what I leaked in regards to drones you played the card that WRAY did - but WRAY did it without his own MIC in Turkey - you were on the stand with Brennan, Clapper and Comey when asked. That's why. That was documented - why haven't you come out to support my efforts in the ILLEGAL DRONE STRIKES - that would open up PANDORA'S BOX - down to BENGHAZI - SEAL TEAM SIX etc. @DAGToddBlanche ask Michelle Bachman.

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

Tonight I will be releasing a PROJECT we have been working on for a while - THIS PROJECT is a mini spin off of a MAJOR one in the process since summer 2020 when I realized how controlled INFO SHARING IS.
Remember to keep an eye out for my blast and stream.
This is how you side step Influence Operations, tainted data and narratives by their operators "good" or "bad" they shouldn't exist. WE NEED TRUTH and EVIDENCE.
We drink from the well~🐦‍⬛

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

Some people say. (Mostly grifters)
“Tore isn’t an anon”
That’s true . I’m not an anon - I may be the one you’ve been decoding.
CHECKMATE Government Relations LLC bitches. (Google it)

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

https://t.co/VNYP6KPHLV

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

https://t.co/nULCAPle8g

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

T.O.R.E. (mini beta launch) Explainer. https://t.co/tNGyurPOgx

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

THE GENEVA FILES · AN INVESTIGATIVE SERIES PART I Tedros: The Selection https://t.co/4PBFl83q7i

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

THE FAUCI FILES PART ONE https://t.co/lOHPn9rOzc

[Chaos Coordinator @idontexistTore]

The Fauci Files Part I is dropping tonight - at 9 pm- on https://t.co/0aN2Pq2JHL and tomorrow on X and Substack.

Sneak Peek