mathias s w

Artiste

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

Something worth thinking about: the emission pools and pending claim rewards.

In the current wallet and architectural design, QNC rewards don't automatically appear in your balance. They accumulate as pending and the node operator claims them manually through the app.

That's actually an interesting design choice when you think about it.

Any QNC sitting unclaimed isn't circulating in the market. It's essentially held in a pending state until the operator actively chooses to claim it. Over time, across thousands of node operators with different habits, circumstances, and timelines, a meaningful amount of QNC could exist in this uncirculated state at any given moment.

This is similar in concept to Bitcoin that has never moved. The coins exist but they aren’t in active circulation, which creates a form of effective scarcity beyond what the emission schedule alone suggests.

Now this makes me think about an interesting extension of that idea in Phase 2.

If the same claim mechanic were applied to Pool #3 distributions, where activation payments redistributed to existing nodes also sit pending until claimed rather than being automatically delivered, it could create a similar dynamic for that reward stream too.

It's just an idea worth considering. The economics of uncirculated supply are often underappreciated in how they contribute to scarcity over time.

Just my perspective. I haven't confirmed whether this is already part of the protocol or if the dev plans to include it.

It's simply an interesting idea to think about.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

I’d argue QNET BLOCKCHAIN @AIQnetLab introduces a more comprehensive economic model for preserving and growing value over time.

Built as a post-quantum Layer 1 blockchain, QNET combines scarcity, long-term emissions, and redistribution into a single economic design.

During Phase 1, every node activation permanently burns 1DEV. As more people activate nodes, the circulating supply decreases, increasing scarcity while expanding the network. This creates a double benefit for 1DEV holders. As demand for node activations grows, 1DEV can appreciate through increasing scarcity, while node operators accumulate QNC through the protocol’s long-term emission schedule.

QNC has a fixed maximum supply of 4,294,967,296, no premine, and every coin enters circulation only through emissions. Unlike Bitcoin, whose block rewards eventually become very small and approach zero, QNET emission schedule continues for decades with a halving every four years and a sharp drop at year 20 before halving resumes. Emission never reaches zero, providing ongoing rewards to active participants indefinitely.

In Phase 2, every new node activation paid in QNC is redistributed equally to all existing active nodes through Pool #3. Network growth directly rewards existing participants rather than relying only on price appreciation.

QNET also lowers the barrier to participation significantly. Through its Proof of Participation model (PoP), a mobile light node earns the same base emission rewards as a professional server node. No expensive mining hardware. No specialised equipment. Just a smartphone and a reliable internet connection. Anyone anywhere can participate equally.

On the transaction side, QNET minimum network fee is 0.00001 QNC, making it genuinely viable for micropayments at a level most blockchains cannot offer. Sending value, paying for services, or transacting between applications costs a fraction that barely registers even at meaningful token valuations. That fee structure makes QNET practical for real world everyday economic activity, not just store of value.

Beyond that, the QRC-20 token standard allows developers to build tokens, DeFi protocols, payment systems, and applications directly on QNET’s post-quantum foundation. Anything built on QRC-20 inherits quantum resistant security automatically without developers needing to implement it themselves.

From my perspective, that’s what makes QNET a genuinely different approach to economic protection. Instead of relying solely on an asset becoming more valuable over time, the protocol is designed so participants can continue accumulating newly emitted QNC while benefiting from 1DEV scarcity, Pool #3 redistribution in Phase 2, micropayment capable infrastructure, and an ecosystem foundation that extends the network’s utility far beyond a single asset.

It’s a fundamentally different economic design from simply buying and holding.

The QNet has you, Eon…

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

Whether the QNET developer is Satoshi or not is beside the point. What I recognize is this: he's carrying forward many of the principles and values that made Satoshi Nakamoto's work so influential.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

Something worth understanding before memecoin culture shapes how you think about 1DEV.

Burning tokens is one of the most overused tactics in crypto. Projects burn millions or even billions of tokens with great fanfare, presenting supply reduction as if scarcity alone creates value. Yet many of those same projects eventually fail, get abandoned, or end in a rug pull. The burn was real. The value wasn’t. Scarcity alone doesn’t create a sustainable economy.

The reason is simple. A token with no real utility has no mechanism to convert scarcity into lasting demand. Once the excitement around the burn fades, the same fundamental problem remains: nothing meaningful is being built around the token.

1DEV is different because the burn is functional, not cosmetic.

Every 1DEV burned activates a node on a real post-quantum blockchain network. The burn doesn’t simply reduce supply. It permanently converts a token into network participation. Demand for the burn comes from the utility it unlocks, not from the announcement itself. That’s a completely different economic model from the typical memecoin burn.

The developer’s allocation is also worth looking at objectively.

He has been transparent about what he holds and why. He holds 10% directly and 15% in a publicly verifiable two-year vesting contract. According to him, those tokens are intended to help protect against snipers during early price discovery and to support stable exchange listings in the future.

Unlike many projects where large allocations appear without explanation, this allocation was disclosed, explained, and made publicly verifiable from the beginning. He has also said he sells small amounts transparently every two weeks to fund development and living expenses rather than doing so through undisclosed wallets.

Here’s the part I find interesting.

Many people look at the developer’s allocation and think it’s too much. I sometimes find myself thinking the opposite. If the long-term vision is successful, 25% may not actually be that much to support years of development, exchange listings, partnerships, ecosystem growth, and everything else a global blockchain requires.

To me, that makes the allocation surprisingly bullish.

Why? Because it suggests the developer may believe each token, and even small fractions of a token, could become valuable enough that he wouldn’t need an enormous percentage of the supply to achieve those long-term goals. Whether that interpretation is correct or not, I think it’s an interesting way to look at it.

Most people see the allocation. I think the assumptions behind the allocation are even more interesting.

Just my perspective.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

@msw151095 @joselakio I have been ready since day 1 🐺

[mathias s w @msw151095]

@RajiMoses_ @joselakio from day 2 😏

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

@joselakio spotted something very massive happening in the QNET explore, he said;

"Current test in explorer have been running for 7 hours and show a lot of QNC transfers with 2 different amounts (first at the beggining of tests and then 2 hours later) 👀"

What he is seeing live on the Block Explorer is the real-world execution of Commit #1189 external load-test harness

The developer deployed code to measure confirmed TPS, finality latency, and 2-level proof sampling under pressure. Those continuous QNC transfers running for over 7 hours are the live stress test simulating heavy network adoption.

Reading the Explorer: What is this 7-Hour Test Actually Proving?

If you have been watching the QNet block explorer closely today, you probably noticed a massive wave of activity. The test has been running for over 7 hours straight, pushing thousands of transactions through the network.

This isn't just a random spam test to see if the network works. What we are watching live is a highly targeted endurance stress test (⁠qnet-loadtest⁠) designed to prove two major things:

1. Post-Quantum Processing Under Pressure: The network is processing transactions signed with our new, standardized post-quantum keys (ML-DSA-65/FIPS-204). Post-quantum cryptography is mathematically heavy, but this test proves the network can process thousands of these secure signatures back-to-back for hours without a single node lagging or dropping transactions. 

2. Lightning-Fast Mobile Verification: The system is generating a mountain of transaction history to prove that our new Sharded Logs feature works. Even with 7 hours of non-stop history piling up, a mobile wallet running a light node can still verify any single transaction instantly using a tiny cryptographic proof, without needing to download the entire chain's history.

Why Are There Two Different Amounts? (The 1,000.00 vs 0.000000001 QNC)

If you look closely at the transaction history, you’ll see the load tester is sending two very specific amounts: 1,000.00 QNC and 0.000000001 QNC.

These aren't random numbers. They represent two completely different testing environments running side-by-side:

1. The 1,000.00 QNC Transfers (Testing Velocity & Database Health)

The large, whole-number transfers are designed to simulate normal, high-velocity network usage.

• By moving substantial, identical blocks of currency between test wallets, the system is checking for database consistency.

• It's proving that even when processing thousands of transfers a minute, the ledger balances update with absolute mathematical accuracy, and the nodes don't experience any memory bloat or synchronization stalls.

2. The 0.000000001 QNC Transfers (Testing the Canonical Burn & Gas Refunds)

This micro-fraction is the most exciting part. The tiny ⁠0.000000001⁠ transactions represent the network testing the Canonical Burn Address.

• To test the burn engine, the load-test harness is automatically sending the smallest possible unit of QNC to our mathematically unspendable burn address (⁠0000000000000000000eon00000000000000036877022⁠).

• Every time one of these micro-burns happens, the blockchain has to instantly calculate the reduction in circulating supply, update the global statistics, and handle any transaction gas/storage refunds.

Basically:

The ⁠1,000.00⁠ transactions prove the network's speed and raw muscle. The ⁠0.000000001⁠ transactions prove the network's extreme mathematical precision. Seeing both run flawlessly for 7 hours straight shows that QNet is primed and ready for real-world utility.

QNET BLOCKCHAIN
@AIQnetLab

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

In the vast crypto space, QNET is Gargantua, the black hole drawing in everything that crosses its path towards 1DEV.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

The developmental progress is real and the commits confirm it. 150+ commits over three months, consensus engine rebuilt, committee scaling from 100 to 1,000 Super Nodes, trustless balance proofs, supply tracking hardened, unified search rebuilt, all tests passing green.

If you’re seeing my posts, I hope you’re paying attention to this significant body of work moving steadily toward testnet.

#1DEV

[mathias s w @msw151095]

@CryptoFarhadHQ @AIQnetLab ❤

[CryptoFarhadHQ @CryptoFarhadHQ]

QNET @AIQnetLab #1dev will be huge
I'm waiting for testnet. It's coming soon 🔜
GitHub: https://t.co/4BzUOohElv
CA: 4R3DPW4BY97kJRfv8J5wgTtbDpoXpRv92W957tXMpump

[mathias s w @msw151095]

@RajiMoses_ ❤

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

The QNet wallet is the ultimate upgrade. Unlike ordinary wallets that blindly trust external servers, the QNet wallet actually runs a real, quantum-resistant light node on your device, mathematically proving your token balances are 100% real down to the byte. Trustless at its absolute peak.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

Non-believers may one day come back to buy 1DEV in fractions of a token, just as many people buy fractions of BTC, ETH, and SOL today.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

"Too much shit on the web, bro. We need to run nodes to save the world." — Mati

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

Who controls access when supply itself becomes the battlefield?

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

By the time 75% of the supply is burned, the network would have already proven itself through both testnet and mainnet. At that point, the price wouldn’t be based on speculation anymore, it would reflect a working, proven asset.

Even though the dynamic pricing model means fewer 1DEV are required to activate a node, the dollar cost of activation could still be much higher than it is today because each remaining token could be worth significantly more.

Imagine a meme coin with 800,000+ holders not even ANSEM has hit that milestone. I also think the comparison to a memecoin with 800,000+ holders is interesting, but it’s important to understand the difference. Memecoins usually attract holders through hype, speculation, and viral momentum. QNET is completely different. The only way to activate a node is by burning 1DEV, so the demand comes from real utility rather than speculation. That creates a very different type of holder and a very different market dynamic.

The fact that some people will be accumulating little by little, buying dips, and gradually working toward the activation requirement is actually fascinating to think about and that alone shows that paticipation is very healthy for the smallest investors, It shows that even people with limited capital can still participate instead of being completely priced out. And every one of those people who eventually reaches the activation threshold and burns their 1DEV reduces the circulating supply even further, reinforcing the burn mechanism over time while activating a real quantum-resistant node on a post-quantum-resistant blockchain.

The price could obviously end up being far higher than anything any of us can imagine today.

[Г☻яԁ ωλʈɛʐɤ Ðѕєєя @RajiMoses_]

2^.^32

[Joselakio @joselakio]

@AIQnetLab dev has been absolutely cooking for the last 3 days straight, shipping non-stop updates on github.

When a dev works at this pace, you know something big is just around the corner.

​Keeping my eyes glued to $1dev 👀