MTFutures

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 am i missing something? 6663 hit?

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 NL sub here. At 10.30 we hit 6620 and ran up to 6657. Also at 9.30 we hit 6611 and ran up to 6655. Both of these ran 30+ to qualify for fbd. if price runs to 35, do we enter again or wait for one of these fbd to occur and then enter for 35 long? ty

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 NL sub. I think 90% of reclaim seems to result in drawdown. the 6749 attempted 3 key reclaims from 9.30 and went up to 6758 but couldn't reach the 64 back test area..it may get there but i had to face the reality of exiting the trade to protect acct.

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 Seems like we are testing 6785....that level got messy from 11 am onwards...is that still a good level and .if we successfully reclaim, upside target is 6793 and 6804?

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 was hoping for the overnight flush and recover. The 35 acceptance was a good example you provided for learners. Bit taken aback by the rally from there despite the possibility of over night flush. Is 6827-6832 the final magnet?

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 ty!! useful tip!

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 The chop was so severe that the first trade of 61 reclaim was good and took the tp at 72 but the subsequent reclaim attempt of 61 and 66 per NL got shot down and stop got taken out compromising the tp i had acheived..trying to stay away from this megaphone channel.

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@lamarroemer @AdamMancini4 I guess so..saw the post for TPs as 50 and 60..so held it to see if I can get to 50 1st. Reduced TP target to 44 as I saw some good structure of resistance above that at 46. But it flushed.

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@D5star_general @AdamMancini4 I thought about it..but since NL said if price is collapsing and we got 6813, that's 17 pts below the entry is pretty rough though..you know?

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 Hey Adam, In the ON sweep case, what was the targeted entry 73 or 78 after acceptance? NL said recovery of 78, but ON had basing at 73. 78 recovery to 1st TP of 82, is way too short a dist. I missed the boat to capture but want to learn. TQ!

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 NL sub. Can you enlighten, why the 6938 recovery failed especially when that zone has been tested to death? this probably was not the best trade entry i ever took. should have stayed away to protect my account.

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @AdamMancini4 ty for the levels today of 42 reclaim. platform closed. happy new year to all! Here is something that I follow ever since started trading futures and every time I read your NL.
https://t.co/QzqelURwWU

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 what a deep flush and recovery to get to the target..ty Adam. God bless you!. Platform closed. ty!

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 @SuperHumanEpoch ...nice advise at the right time, I was curious about the NL levels, where flush to 47 and recovery of 52 was actionable, which happened at 2:30 AM and 6:15 AM. But price continue to retest that range even now. Sitting on entry at 52 to get to target levels.

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 thx for the level. the 42 reclaim was a nice one. NL methodology typically suggests to wait for 2-3 mins , looking at the micro 1 min chart,price kept testing 40, i guess that is still a valid test of 42 zone. For people who missed, does a flush and reclaim of 42 still valid?tx

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 Thanks @AdamMancini4 . although that 44 zone had a lot of context back from Oct, was bit surprised about the rally from there to reclaim 59, as I was anticipating price to get down to 35-38 zone from NL, if 59 zone failed as there wasn't much below..

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 Hey Adam, based on price action this morning, is 59 a well accepted zone? as we rallied up to 67 and came back to retest 44 and accepted it well. I'm inclined to read 59 is weak unless we test real hard over the next 5-15 mins. Any thoughts?

[MTFutures @mt56281]

@AdamMancini4 Understood..thank you and good insight to keep it in mind!!