pra vcs verem como mulher tem uma empatia que homem nenhum vai ter: as meninas pra não te chamarem de horrendo, falavam que vc era fofo, enquanto qualquer menina na puberdade era chamada de prostituta pra baixo por outros meninos
@Nofungirlsoevil That’s interpretive reductionism, reducing the scene to “it’s just jealousy” and dismissing any deeper symbolism or underlying implications. Good luck staying that superficial.
At this point, you must be choosing to be naive. You talk as if these were real people and not fictional characters. The central issue is the author of the work, who chose to include that particular scene.
@mtbdbp@Shalini07308144@wiorony I don't see the logic here. I'm sure this character would be just as jealous if they were men's shoes instead of women's. He's just a jealous asshole, and I'm sure he kicked her shoes not because she's a woman, but because he's jealous of his boyfriend's for her
@Nofungirlsoevil "He's just a jealous asshole, and I'm sure he kicked her shoes not because she's a woman, but because he's jealous of his boyfriend's for her" your words, "he" didn’t decide anything; the author wrote it that way.
@lonelinesstar@wiorony And is it really necessary to use situations like the one in the picture above to show that he’s obsessed with his male partner? Where she puts a shoe that obviously represents the presence of a woman, and the man kicks it away? It’s ridiculous.
@Nofungirlsoevil@Shalini07308144@wiorony Why kick the shoe when it was clearly placed there to represent a woman? Why does it specifically have to be a “feminine” shoe? The underlying misogyny is pretty obvious.
@hanabliy@Shalini07308144@Nofungirlsoevil@wiorony Minha filha e pra que adicionar o sapato que obviamente tá ali pra representar algo relacionado as mulheres e colocar o homem chutando? Não poderia deixar só os outros dois?