@wagieeacc@codethazine@fareesh It is almost like they want to fail mturk so they can close it and be done with it. Billing is a nightmare now and getting setup is a horror script.
@opinonhaver It is all self report through questions amazon asks participants. IMO it is not worth it. I do a short prescreen survey and then invite back participants who meet the demographic. It usually works out to be less expensive than using the premium qualifications.
@bmwiernik@mjskay@syardi Part of the problem was they were trying to push new AWS on mturk when a majority of users wanted a simple clean interface that was easy to use. I honestly think they have just given up because it is easier than listening to users.
@jimmyroybloom Good video on the basics. This guide should be used in conjunction with it https://t.co/N4Rf3VyMvW Just publishing a survey without understanding the platform can lead to poor quality results.
@MirzayevEmil You have to do it with the mturk API. There was a cool tool using R but mturk decided to recode and broke it. I think someone reconfigured it MTurkR if you want to try that.
Otherwise one at a time :)
@RyanKennedy7 We have been used as a middleman because we are not Amazon. It might help. But you would be paying us for something that you can do yourself.
@BBCNews@PayPal raised fees on the entire site. It is not a UK/Europe thing, it is a major cash grab worldwide. You can only raise fees so much before your customers leave. Wire transfers are less convenient but much cheaper.
@farid_anvari I agree, we have done daily diary studies with set time frames in the past using 3-4 hour windows for completion using emails. As long as participants know the schedule on the initial screen, they work fairly well.
@farid_anvari Why would phone numbers be needed? Emails on mturk are anonymous when using the API and prolific sends messages through the platform so email addresses are not needed. Longitudinal studies can be run on both.
@SheRambl @theKareemWillis@Prof_JJohnson Cloud Research uses mturk for participant sourcing. You could also use Prolific Academic for a different participant pool.
@tarariggs On the first wave make your qualifications as high as possible. 10k submitted, greater than or equal to 99% approval. Have increasing payments for each wave and a bonus for completion of all parts.
@QuinettaPhD Yes, and different variations. Successful completion of entire study receives bonus which was described in briefing as passing ACQs. Another was comprehension failure/ACQ failure disqualifies bonus.
@mark_riedl@MichaelDoronII I would not say that it is unreliable, but it has changed and requires better screening and additional security to ensure you are getting the participants you are looking for. It is disappointing the premium @amazonmturk is charging for the quality of service though.