@ckertonjohnson@JamesLucasIT As an academic, you may want to try a cursory fact-check on Google Maps, which will demonstrate that the headline graphic is, in fact, nonsense.
@DanStylus@lizabidobay I don't think there's an "anti-men" sentiment to the original post, I think there's a "don't be a scary weirdo" sentiment. You said yourself, you've never been on dating apps, so reading it and shouting "liar" in a public forum is just a bit of an obnoxious dick move really.
@VenablesJayne I feel his testimony carefully misleads, by inviting us to conflate the isolated assignment of bugs with a narrow, blinkered view of code quality, which is implausible at a component level (e.g. EPOS). Beyond that, I wouldn't want to speculate. 🤐
@VenablesJayne First off, he seemed like a well-prepped witness. He paints a picture of a siloed workforce, where nobody had broad enough visibility to appreciate macro flaws. However, the diagnostic work to resolve bugs rarely involves reading one line of code...
@thomevans@mattpocockuk ☝🏽This is how I understand it.
I've been doing mental gymnastics trying to work out when TSDoc annotations persist across operations and when they don't, and I suppose this is a similar question about under-the-hood metadata and its retention in the type system.
@lqiao@FireworksAI_HQ Okay, this is very cool, but did anyone else read the description and mentally autocorrect every instance of "bridge" to "viaduct"?
@EmmaBostian Good on you, Emma. Society makes it tough to focus on your own wellbeing as a priority, as it sells the fallacy that you should deliver as a professional, parent, partner, etc without breaking a sweat. Best of luck, it will be a huge boost for you & your loved ones!
@Nem_Nova@sweet21991 @guitarhoop @Acyn@AOC That Fox News article!? Dude, you got clickbaited. If you read beyond the headline you'd find exactly zero referenced books containing pornography.
Handy life hack: avoid ever reading and/or quoting Fox News to mitigate risk of embarrassment in a public forum!
@coolaj86@josepheames Are you aware that any solution that uses recursion can be replaced by a solution using a loop pretty trivially, thus sidestepping any of the risks of indefinite stack growth?