I'm at #BuildwithGemini Jakarta and today I built RealmForge Party Builder, an AI agent that crafts balanced fantasy RPG adventuring parties and character backstories! 🎲⚔️
📹 Cek kondisi jalan dan situasi Demo di berbagai lokasi secara langsung melalui CCTV publik:
https://t.co/jJTZe90hO4…
Pantau kondisi terkini dengan mudah dan bagikan ke teman-teman yang membutuhkan informasi real-time.
🙌🏻 #IndonesiaGelap#WargaJagaWarga
TEMEN2 YANG MAU AKSES CCTV UNTUK CEK KONDISI JAKARTA SAAT INI BISA KLIK DI SINI YA:
https://t.co/9b1KnYFvkj
Bisa bantu share ke temen2 semua untuk cek kondisi #demo hari ini 🙌🏻 #IndonesiaGelap#WargaJagaWarga
Sebagai engineer Indo yang belajar banyak dari Ibam, baca ini sakit hati rasanya.
Satu-satunya saran buat teman-teman tech di titik ini: usahakan cari jalan untuk berkarier di luar negeri. Kalaupun stay, jauh-jauh dari public sector atau pemerintahan, tetap di private sector.
Teknologi di Indonesia sudah selesai. Investasi terbaik saat ini yang bisa kita berikan buat generasi berikutnya: berkarya sebaik-baiknya di luar negeri dan membangun network seluas-luasnya.
Selamat tinggal keadilan, selamat jalan teknologi Indonesia. Unicorn era was a nice ride.
Mengapa Negara Menzalimi Suami Saya, yang Tulus Berkorban Banyak Untuk Negara?
Sebagai istri, sakit hati rasanya. Enam belas tahun aku kenal Ibam, dia ngga money oriented. Niatnya tulus. Kalau sudah mau bantu, dia akan benar-benar bantu.
Ibam dituntut penjara 15 tahun dan harus bayar Rp16,9 miliar, kalau tidak maka pidananya ditambah 7,5 tahun.
Berarti, Ibam dituntut 22,5 tahun penjara.
Ibam, yang pernah menolak tawaran puluhan miliar karena merasa misi bantu negara lewat bangun teknologi masih belum selesai.
Sekarang ironisnya dituduh korupsi. Padahal sampai 57 saksi diperiksa, tidak ada satu pun bukti Ibam memperkaya diri. Tidak ada konflik kepentingan untuk memperkaya orang lain.
Dia hanya konsultan teknis, rela tolak tawaran asing, turun gaji demi negara, ngga punya jabatan dan kewenangan, selalu profesional dan netral dalam kasih masukan, tapi terjebak dalam pusaran para elite birokrasi.
Masukan teknis Ibam yang sudah terdokumentasi baik, transparan akan kelebihan dan kekurangan, diceritakan sepotong-sepotong saja oleh pejabat pengadaan. Sehingga seakan-akan Ibam memaksa hanya Chromebook.
Untungnya, Ibam punya banyak dokumentasi yang sudah jadi bukti di persidangan. Sudah terungkap di sidang bahwa:
1. Ibam bukan pejabat, tapi konsultan yayasan. Gaji Ibam sama sekali bukan dari APBN.
2. Ibam baru kenal Nadiem setelah dia jadi menteri. Ngga ada persekongkolan, dan ngga pernah ketemu personal.
3. Di banyak bukti chat & notulen rapat: Ibam tidak mengarahkan pengadaan, tidak buat kajian, bahkan Ibam minta kementerian untuk uji Chromebook dulu.
4. Pejabat Eselon I akhirnya mengakui: dia yang menolak masukan pengujian Ibam, dia yang memutuskan Chromebook lewat SK yang dia keluarkan.
5. Ahli IT telah menyatakan masukan Ibam sudah netral dan profesional, sesuai best practice keahlian, serta benar dalam menyerahkan keputusan ke kementerian.
Puncaknya, nama Ibam dicatut ke dalam SK pengadaan yang tidak pernah dia ketahui sebelumnya. Dalam pengesahan kajian Chromebook yang ditugaskan SK, tidak ada tanda tangan Ibam.
Terungkap juga di sidang, belasan pejabat, termasuk yang berupaya ‘menyalahkan’ Ibam, mengakui telah menerima ratusan juta rupiah suap dari vendor. Namun mereka semua bebas, tidak ada yang jadi tersangka.
Disaat mereka bebas, Ibam ditahan dan dituntut penjara. Bagiku perkara ini jelas. Suamiku bukan pelaku, tapi korban permainan elite birokrasi yang seenaknya melempar semua keputusan mereka pada Ibam.
Sekarang, kami hampir sampai di ujung jalan.
Ibam dituntut 22,5 tahun penjara.
Dua terdakwa lain, pejabat Eselon II di Kemendikbud, yang mengatur pengadaan dan sudah mengakui ada aliran dana sampai miliaran rupiah, dituntut 6 tahun saja.
Semakin kontras ketika surat tuntutan sendiri mengakui: tidak ada aliran dana ke Ibam.
Tuntutan bilang di laporan SPT 2021, kekayaan Ibam naik Rp16,9 miliar. Ibam sudah tunjukkan bukti di persidangan kalau itu dari saham Bukalapak yang didapat jauh sebelum Ibam menjadi konsultan Kemendikbud, tidak ada kaitannya sama sekali dengan Chromebook atau Gojek.
Bukti itu ditolak JPU dalam tuntutannya. Mereka bilang karena Ibam sudah resign, sahamnya hangus. Mereka tidak paham kata-kata dalam surat pemberian saham, bahwa yang hangus hanya “saham yang belum diberikan”. Padahal, sebelum resign juga ada sebagian saham yang sudah diberikan.
JPU menyatakan, karena mereka tolak bukti itu, Rp16,9 miliar Ibam diduga hasil korupsi, jadi mereka tuntut 15 tahun ditambah 7,5 tahun.
Bagi kami, ini puncak dari kezaliman. Ibam yang tidak pernah, sekali lagi, TIDAK PERNAH ADA ALIRAN DANA SAMA SEKALI, dikriminalisasi atas prestasinya bantu negara, yang tidak ada hubungannya dengan perkara.
Dua minggu lagi putusan Ibam akan dibacakan oleh Majelis Hakim, kami tetap berharap keadilan putusan bisa sesuai dengan fakta persidangan.
Karena, ini bukan sekedar perkara hukum, ini menyangkut nasib seseorang, masa depan keluarga kami, anak-anak kami, serta kemerdekaan kami sekeluarga.
Setahun terakhir ini adalah masa yang sangat berat bagi kami. Keluarga kami kehilangan penghasilan, kesehatan jantung Ibam kian memburuk, bahkan tabungan hidup kami terkuras habis untuk biaya medis dan biaya hukum.
Namun, aku bersaksi bahwa Ibam adalah seorang perintis. Hidupnya penuh perjuangan dari kecil, insya Allah kami siap bangun dari nol lagi.
Hanya saja, jika pengabdian untuk Indonesia harus dibayar semahal ini. Jika bukti persidangan sudah seterang ini, dan jika upaya mengkambinghitamkan Ibam sudah sekentara ini, dia tetap dipenjara puluhan tahun...
Ini adalah ketidakadilan yang teramat pahit.
Bukan hanya bagi Ibam, tapi bagi siapa pun yang pernah atau akan bantu bangsa ini dengan niat tulus.
Apa memang berbakti bagi merah putih seberbahaya ini?
Apa memang tidak ada keadilan bagi orang jujur yang sudah berkorban banyak bagi negara?
Tolong bantu kami mencari keadilan untuk Ibam selagi masih ada waktu. Mohon bantu bagikan tulisan ini, pada rekan atau kerabat, konsultan atau pejabat, siapapun yang bisa bantu menyuarakan keadilan dan memberi perhatian.
Agar tidak ada lagi profesional seperti Ibam yang jadi korban kriminalisasi.
Jakarta, 16 April 2026
Ririe - Istri dari Ibrahim Arief (Ibam)
Today, I become a dad.
Since I have been a VTuber for 5 years, i never imagined happen this.
one day, the boy would know his dad is Internet Virtual Girl.
BREAKING: AI can now build financial models like Goldman Sachs analysts (for free).
Here are 12 Claude prompts that replace $150K/year investment banking work (Save for later)
I found out my girlfriend cheated on me. Instead of breaking up right away, I made a fake account, sent her the proof anonymously, and told her that if she didn’t send me money, I’d tell her boyfriend everything.
I shared this whole plan with my best friend for advice, but this mf went behind my back and shared everything with my girlfriend.
When confronted, he said
Why does it matter? I thought she deserved to know.
He wasn’t just betraying me. He was behaving like a random variable after you marginalize out all the hidden information.
In probability, to understand what you actually know, you marginalize over hidden variables.
That means you sum over all the possibilities you can’t observe to compute the probability of what you can observe.
Marginal probability is a statistical measure that represents the probability of a single event by aggregating over all possible values of other variables.
Formula
P(A) = Σ P(A, Bi)
Where
P(A) = Marginal probability of event A
P(A, Bi) = Joint probability of A and B
Σ = Summation
Let's take an example and solve step by step
A dating app wants to find the probability of users sending messages, regardless of whether they get a response. The data shows message sent vs response received:
Short forms
- M = Message
- R = Response
Joint Probability Table
- M (Yes), R (Yes) = 0.30
- M (Yes), R (No) = 0.25
- M (No), R (Yes) = 0.10
- M (No), R (No) = 0.35
Step 1 What we want to marginalize
- We want P(M = Yes)
Step 2 Joint probabilities for M = Yes
- P(M = Yes, R = Yes) = 0.30
- P(M = Yes, R = No) = 0.25
Step 3 Apply marginal probability
- P(M = Yes)
- P(M=Yes, R=Yes) + P(M=Yes, R=No)
- 0.30 + 0.25 = 0.55
P(Message = Yes) = 0.55
Final Answer
The marginal probability of a user sending a message is 0.55 or 55%, regardless of whether they receive a response.
Congratulations, you've just learned Marginal Probability.
Bonus: Applications in AI/ML
1. Bayesian Networks:
Computing marginal probabilities by summing out irrelevant variables to make predictions and inferences in graphical models.
2. Latent Variable Models:
In topic modeling (LDA) and hidden Markov models, marginalizing over hidden states to find the probability of observed data.
3. Feature Selection:
Identifying which features independently correlate with target variables by computing marginal distributions, helping reduce dimensionality.
4. Probabilistic Classification:
Naive Bayes classifiers use marginal probabilities of features to classify data, assuming independence between features.
programmers are making $10k-200k monthly on polymarket
here's how they actually do it
///
1. arbitrage bots
buy YES + NO when combined price < $1
example: YES at 48¢ + NO at 49¢ = 97¢ total
you lock $0.03 profit per $1 no matter who wins
trader "distinct-baguette" made $242k in 1.5 months doing this
targets 15-min crypto markets where prices move fast
python script polls API every 1-3 seconds, executes when sum < 99¢
///
2. statistical arbitrage
find correlated markets that drift apart
"trump wins" vs "GOP senate control" should move together
when spread hits 4-7%, short expensive one, long cheap one
close when they converge
trader "sharky6999" made $480k scanning 100+ markets per minute
///
3. AI probability models
train ML models to estimate real odds from news/social data
if your model says 60% YES but market at 50¢, buy
trader "ilovecircle" made $2.2M in 2 months with 74% accuracy
uses ensemble of 10 AI models, retrains weekly
///
4. spread farming
buy at bid (5¢), sell at ask (6¢), repeat
or hedge across platforms (short polymarket, long binance)
trader "cry.eth2" made $194k with 1M trades
high-frequency loop via CLOB API
///
5. copy-trading automation
mirror successful whale traders automatically
scan profiles, execute proportional trades
one bot made $80k in 2 weeks copying near-resolved markets
///
tech stack:
python + requests library for API calls
web3-py for blockchain interactions deploy on VPS for 24/7 operation
polymarket has REST APIs for everything:
gamma markets API (prices/volumes)
CLOB API (place orders)
data API (track positions)
///
starting point:
> build simple arbitrage bot first
> fund with $100-1k for testing target high-volume markets (politics/crypto)
> expect 50-70% win rate but focus on positive EV
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.