a new project just dropped inside the @Polymarket ecosystem.
polyscore is basically ethos but for polymarket, you can see any trader's score directly on twitter thanks to their extension.
keep building.
Introducing Polyscore
A transparent, fair rating system for Polymarket traders. Every trader starts at 1000 Score. Your score changes based on real trading results.
Let me explain how it works
Polyscore is being created to identify Profitable Traders based on their trading performance.
Our platform and browser extension will become available in the coming days.
@0xCygaar Not the best solution. It will make speculating, finding new ways to get XP, and holding ecosystem NFTs/tokens pointless, because whales can just farm XP with more money
IMHO
Abstract @AbstractChain
On Twitter and Telegram, I’ve seen lots of different badge and tier statistics - but they’re always inconsistent. So, I decided to compile my own. I used my own software to collect addresses from the blockchain, taking every address that had any interaction with the network - a total of 2,530,000. After that, using the official API, I gathered data on the number of badges and the tier each wallet falls into.
Badges:
0: 1.8M
1–5 (basic badges): 255K
6–10: 393K
11–15: 47K
16–20: 8,100
21+: 3,966
Tiers:
Bronze: 570K (actually more, since empty accounts also get this badge, but it doesn’t really matter)
Silver: 146K
Gold: 6,858
Platinum: 184
Diamond: 0
You can explore the data yourself in GPT and check whatever stats you’re interested in. I’m sharing the final CSV with the data https://t.co/VyU3mpf51z
@CircuitAI@0xfoobar@11AMdotclub how is it works? you said "run on your own wallet", so that's not internal wallet (like it was on Newton). how you did it safe for user?
A message to @SuccinctLabs Team & Succinct Discord users.
Recently, I’ve seen Discord users mocking the on-chain or testnet users who received 20–200 $PROVE.
(That behavior is not just disrespectful- it’s embarrassing. You're not above anyone. Everyone deserves respect. Humility isn’t a weakness, try it sometime.)
🫵🏻 If you truly believe in fairness, answer this:
1. First let's start with the gamified Testnet.
You are saying that we only played games for some hours in the whole six months and don't deserve the rewards, right?
Then tell me why did the @SuccinctLabs team come up with the idea of gamified Testnet & gate it to 25k users only?
Only to blame testnet players in the last?
Clearly, the goal wasn’t just playing games, we were testing the core product and helping generate actual proofs.
2. The main motive of Succinct Testnet was to generate proofs while playing the games.
Each star earned in the UI directly reflected a successful proof generated in the backend.
We were the One Who Helped @SuccinctLabs in testing their main product and helped generate proofs, finding bugs & errors to improve the overall system.
Not your Discord spam message contributed in a single way to generate proofs or test their products.
We helped test the actual product. Know the difference before mocking testnet users.
3. We were early we get access to Succinct testnet stage 1.
Now you joined late, you grinded hard & You get:-
Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 2.5 and Now HUGE REWARDS. That's ok.
Apparently Succinct already rewarding you fairly from the start.
THEN why are you HATING US to get rewarded just for being early in Stage 1?
Also, you’ll be claiming your $PROVE on-chain, not on X or Discord.
So why criticize the on-chain users? Aren’t you one too?
It’s not us. It’s the TEAM that failed in fair distribution(but don't know what's really going on in their mind.)
$PROVE Airdrop Allocation: 5%
It seems like:
▪️ Stage 1 users: 1%
▪️ Discord users & top contributors: 4%
The team needs to reallocate the $PROVE airdrop with proper multipliers, for example:
Stage 1 users- 1x
Stage 2 users- 1.25x
X or Discord contributors- 1.5x
ALL IN SUCCINCT- 2x
Top contributors- 4-5x
That’s how fair distribution should look.
But we know Discord spammers will never support this, they’re already happy with their allocation. If they really have gotten the same allocation then the scenario you can imagine :)
🫳🏻 If you made the Testnet Only to play games & generate proofs,
Then what’s wrong with rewarding your real testnet players here? 🫴🏻
Let’s talk honestly;
.@SuccinctFND failed to reward their actual product users. So, what next?
Forward to: @pumatheuma@jtguibas@0xCRASHOUT@advaith@DanHennessy@mattstam_eth@chasedevens@fakedev9999@theedwardli
4th Img credit: @CryptoHindiO.
When you see dozens of screenshots showing allocations of 10,000–60,000 $PROVE @SuccinctLabs, don’t forget that there are thousands of people who received just 20 $PROVE after spending half a year participating in the testnet.
@0xCRASHOUT@advaith will you repost this result? 🥰
@LFTokenz01 @SuccinctLabs@0xCRASHOUT@advaith cry for what? If you’re happy with that allocation, then I’m happy for you. I just not happy with mine. that’s all
calm down man and stop being so toxic or I will block you. Do not use caps lock.
What do you mean “bot”? If I didn’t made thousands of replies/quotes/discord messages, am I bot? or it could be bot who made it for half a year? Where is a logic.
It was incentivized testnet, not contributions contest. I didn’t wrote anything about contributors allocations, it’s not interesting for me.