mupps

[mupps @mupps00]

@geoclidean Only x=1 ,y=2, z=3. It's easy to see that for any x, y, z >= 4 the left hand expression is strictly smaller than 11/12. So you only need to check all permutations of {1, 2, 3}

[mupps @mupps00]

@microfusio91945 Dont have pen and paper rn but to sketch my approach
(1)Write tan and sin in their power series represention
(2)Use the Cauchy Product Formula to write the expression on the left as a double sum
(3)Hopefully the sum then has only positive terms and drop all terms except x^3

[mupps @mupps00]

@JackPosobiec A nobel peace price for ending a war he himself started? For a peace deal based on less favourable terms for the US than the pre-war status quo? Are you retarded? Ofcourse I am glad the deal is happening but but Trump deserves no credit

[mupps @mupps00]

@EU_Commission Tell that to @redstreamnet you hypocritical pieces of shit

[Pope Leo XIV @Pontifex]

Absurd and inhuman violence is spreading ferociously through the sacred places of the Christian East, profaned by the blasphemy of war and the brutality of business, with no regard for people’s lives, which are considered at most collateral damage of self-interest. But no gain can be worth the life of the weakest, children, or families. No cause can justify the shedding of innocent blood.

[mupps @mupps00]

@jacksonhinkle If the Iranians were as duplicitous as the American „diplomats“ they would have accepted the ceasefire and then attacked them anyway when they least expected it

[Masoud Pezeshkian @drpezeshkian]

To the people of the United States of America

[mupps @mupps00]

@IsraelinGermany Warum benutzen die israelischen Streitkräfte Zivilisten als menschliche Schutzschilde?

[mupps @mupps00]

@dehotz12345 @KEspahangizi Schön und gut, aber das herum Geheule wenn dann so jemand hingerichtet wird, ist unangebracht.

[mupps @mupps00]

@shlomo96 Teile von euch Rechten sind sehr stabil im Bezug auf dieses Thema. Wir stimmen in so gut wie nichts überein, aber immerhin seid ihr keine Kriegstreiber wie Grüne und Co und das respektiere ich

[mupps @mupps00]

@MelvinMiljkovic So wie es aussieht werdet ihr bald gar nicht mehr regieren also halts Maul

[mupps @mupps00]

@docbrandenburg Easy: Zionismus, Neokonservatismus etc.

[mupps @mupps00]

@Hosenmaus1 Heul doch

[mupps @mupps00]

@NorbertBolz Zionismus = politische Ideogie
Judentum = ethno-religiöse Identität

Wissen sie eigentlich, dass die zionitische Bewegung von vielen Juden Anfang des 20 Jh als Ansammlung von Spinnern und Extremisten gesehen wurde? Sind das auch Anitsemiten?

War Einstein ein Antisemit?

[mupps @mupps00]

@NorbertBolz Juden mit Zionismus gleichzusetzen ist eine Form von Anti-Semitismus. Das ist in etwa so absurd, als würde man jemanden, der eine Abneigung gegen Nazis hat beschuldigen er würde in Wirklichkeit Deutsche hassen

[mupps @mupps00]

@bren45000 Everyone does

[mupps @mupps00]

@IMAO_ "Randomly attacked" lmao. Even for a zio-nazi this is incredible delusional

[mupps @mupps00]

@marcfriedrich Du bist ein feiger Arschkriecher. Du hast den Krieg unterstützt. Jetzt wo die siehst wo das hinführt (so wie alle mit nem IQ höher als 70 es von Anfang an gesehen haben) versuchst du dich davon reinzuwaschen.

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

China and Russia are under no obligation to militarily intervene on any other people's behalf. Geopolitics is not a superhero movie, where morality is fulfilled by whimsical force.

Neither Stalin nor Mao militarily intervened in most anti-imperialist conflicts either, so this is not a result of corruption.

HOWEVER, what many people do not realize is that neither Russia or China have any official paradigm, or working doctrine of international relations beyond international law, and the postwar world order.

This means that officially, they regard the long chain of US aggression as merely a series of unrelated, illegal violations of international law, the UN charter, etc.- and each time, they wag their finger, and condemn the 'misbehavior' of the US.

China does not officially acknowledge the unipolar word order: It it holds that we live in a world of international law, and that the US is merely destabilizing the 'international order' via 'hegemonism' and 'unilateralism.'

Russia's foreign relations paradigm is even more legalistic and conformist.

From a purely analytical point of view, the naive conservatism of this international relations paradigm is suicidal.

It is what has empowered liberal forces within Russia, China and Iran to sabatoge Eurasian integration, based on the theory that they are simply separate states under one international order that recognizes the national right of self-determination.

Imagine a group of pedestrians on the subway. This particular group keeps getting targeted by one maniac. Over and over again. Yet they pretend it's just a coincidence - failing to recognize the characteristics they have in common that make them targets.

For the sake of self-preservation, the rational thing to do is stop treating each other as random pedestrians, and acknowledge the need to do something decisive about the maniac.

Contrary to what my retarded critics claim, I am not a "third worldist." Nor am I making demands of any nation. I am analytically pointing out that without Eurasian integration, the maniac is going to pick everyone off one by one.

A new paradigm of international relations is necessary that recognizes US hegemony as both a de-facto reality and an existential threat to the national security of all states which refuse to surrender to it.

I don't blame Russia or China for not intervening on behalf of Iran. There is no paradigm that even exists which has officialized the common interests and geopolitical position of these nations.

For now this acknowledgement is purely theoretical, usually by Iranian, Russian and Chinese intellectuals who constantly have to clash with globalist liberals within their own countries.

Social media hype has led people to believe there's some secret Eurasian NATO.

THERE ISN'T.

Yes, the official statements these countries put out - as naive as they sound - really does reflect the extent of their geopolitical orientation. There's no occult coordination going on.

I am analytically making the observation that this will eventually imperil all of them, if the current trend continues. No, it's not third worldism. And no, I'm not claiming they should sacrifice their national interests for small countries bullied by America.

I am making a sober and realistic assessment of the world system, international relations, and the nature of the conflict between the US and its 'foreign adversaries.'