@scouseblue47 @GregM2302 Keanes NEVER had a red card in his whole professional career, which for a defender is impressive. He's not a violent player. This wasn't intentional. it certainly wasn't violent conduct. He's tried to grab the player, yes, but not his hair
@Statue4Savage@PrissyMissyyo@The_Forty_Four Apart from the fact the pull is 3 seconds in slow motion compared to less than a second in real time 👍. What was more violent the accidental pull of the hair or this that happened just before? Silly cunt.
@PrissyMissyyo@Statue4Savage@The_Forty_Four He doesn't look at the player, he's looking at the ball, he feels the player back into him and does what every defender does and tries to win the header. This happened in real time, not slow motion as shown on VAR.
@Statue4Savage@The_Forty_Four So based on your suggestion, all high elbows, all high boots etc. Should be red cards? They are both technically ways of players having Intent to gain an advantage whilst risking injury to another player. You're talking bollocks.
@theboovont@Geraint4WxmAFC@The_Forty_Four He doesnt know it's his hair because hes not looked at the player once. And don't give me all that you can feel it bollocks because it happened in real time not slow motion like the replays the VAR shown.
@Statue4Savage@The_Forty_Four A player can have a high elbow and knock a player out unconscious, but it's not a red if there wasn't intent for example "watching the ball". It's the same thing, not violent conduct.
@Statue4Savage@The_Forty_Four Players shouldn't grab shirts, but they ALL do and the majority of the time get away with it in these types of situations. You see it happen ever corner kick. To be violent you need some sort of intent, which in this case there was neither. Like am elbow to the face for example.
@tim171093@The_Forty_Four If done on purpose, he doesn't take his eyes off the ball and has gone to grab his shirt as every defender does. Just this player happened to have long hair.
@ElliottMcD16@TheJacko1878@TacticallyMatt He wasn't looking at what he had hold of, instinctively plays grab a hold of the shirt that's what's Keane has tried to do but the player has long hair. Wasn't intentional nor was it violent conduct.
@UTDgeezer@Onsogbu Not a great deal of difference to where this lorry was parked and one parked in the UK layby. AJs car had no business being where he had the crash, same if it had been a UK lay-by.
@Real_Tipsy@Onsogbu The vehicle isn't in the lane. No reason why he can't park there. Look at the dust where its parked, why was AJs car even near that lorry. Drivers fault not the parked lorry.
When Speaking Truth Becomes Rebellion: Charlie Kirk and the Forgotten Voice of Tommy Robinson
It’s funny, isn’t it? In a world where politicians kneel to mobs and journalists parrot government scripts, it takes an American — @charliekirk11 — to stand up for a British man rotting in a cell for speaking out.
Back in December 2024, at his Turning Point USA event, Charlie didn’t mince words when I interviewed him. While Britain’s establishment was busy branding Tommy Robinson a “threat,” Kirk simply called him what he is — a political prisoner. At that moment, @TRobinsonNewEra had spent 56 days behind bars of a seven-month sentence — for the crime of saying what most Brits whisper over their pints.
Charlie spoke with the clarity Britain once had: that free speech isn’t a luxury, it’s the foundation of civilization. That jailing a man for exposing uncomfortable truths isn’t justice — it’s tyranny wearing a liberal badge.
While the British press was too cowardly to defend Tommy, an American conservative did. Because, apparently, the last defenders of Western liberty now live across the Atlantic.
When Britain silences her sons, someone else must remind her what courage sounds like.
And Charlie did.