There is a limit, though, where revenue becomes bounded by faith in future profit. If you can’t build something that isn’t profitable eventually, you will run out of people willing to fund your experiment. So, why not build systems that eliminate waste, especially when the cost of building something valuable is trending towards zero.
How to keep AI spend flat while token usage grows exponentially: Not with friction and spend alerts. With better defaults, routing, and caching.
Better Defaults (not Usage Caps) – Engineers can choose any model they want, but defaults matter. We’re experimenting with defaulting to open weight models like GLM 5.2 and Kimi 2.7 through our LLM gateway, while still encouraging engineers to choose the right model for the task. 91% of our employees were never hitting their usage caps, so instead of lowering caps and driving up alerts, we're moving to cheaper defaults. Note that code reviews use a diversity of models, so they can check each other's work.
Better Routing – In our custom harnesses, we preprocess prompts and route to the best model for the job, considering cache hits and model pricing. For instance, you may want a frontier model for planning, but not for execution where they can be overkill. Ultimately, humans shouldn't be choosing models - AI can automate this task.
Better Caching – Cache misses are the easiest way to drive your cost up. All of our requests are cache aware, so we’re reusing a warm cache wherever possible. For example, our cache hit rate went from 5% → 60% in LibreChat once properly implemented.
Keep Context Lean – Start fresh sessions when switching tasks. Scope file context narrowly. Disconnect unused tools. Don't just compact. The goal isn't fewer tokens used, it's fewer tokens wasted.
Better Visibility – Our engineers can use as many tokens as they want, from whatever model they want, but we’ve made usage visible – and the more you spend on AI, the more impact we expect.
The goal isn't to suppress usage. It's to build the infrastructure that makes exponential growth sustainable.
Putting this into practice has cut our AI spend nearly in half, while our token usage continues to grow.
Yeah I get the hype on all that spending, but it’s not quite that simple.
Hyperscalers aren’t gunning to axe 70% of their actual people — they’re trying to kill off a bunch of roles that got bloated during the ZIRP hiring frenzy.
Most of them are still just chasing bigger models with zero real plan for making this stuff actually useful day-to-day. The messy correction is real though.
The new model of entrepreneurship (2026+):
Build Audience → Discover Problems → Build Solutions → Go-to-Market
AI supercharges every step.
• Use AI to grow real audiences with smart content & engagement
• Mine comments & conversations to find real pains
• Prototype & iterate MVPs at lightning speed
• Launch with hyper-personalized messaging to people who already know you
Old way = guess and pray.
New way = audience-first + AI = dramatically lower risk and faster wins.
This is how solo builders and small teams win now.
Who’s operating like this? Drop your playbook 👇
#Entrepreneurship #AI #BuildInPublic
Prompting is still important, but they should be thought about as contracts between agents or orchestrator. Context management makes sure agents have what they need without overfilling the window. Loops depend on both of these. Skill development should be auto-improving and versioned. And all of these just set the table for taking advantage of the next breakthrough in a few weeks.
Vibe coding and vibe marketing a business is actually pretty hard. I think we are in a period where the threat to Big Tech is not felt at all, but it is seen as coming. Some companies use it as an opportunity to make cuts needed bc of ZIRP era over hiring. Some will invest heavily to try to cement their edge. Some will invest heavily into AI.
The reality of the threat will be seen in 3-5 years.
Obviously, most of these AI layoffs are just overcorrection for ZIRP hiring sprees. But… most companies, especially big tech likely will need to restructure and consolidate roles due to AI. Better to be a smart generalist who embraces AI systems than a specialized genius who fights AI.
AI is going to drive major role convergence inside companies.
For decades, organizations optimized around specialization because execution was expensive — so we built clear handoffs between PMs, designers, engineers, QA, marketing, and sales.
AI is changing the cost equation. A strong engineer can now sketch, spec, test, build, and document. A strong seller can prospect, research, campaign, and create collateral. Not perfectly, but often well enough.
When execution gets cheaper than coordination, the advantage shifts to people who can work across boundaries.
Curious if others are seeing this too.
AI is an accelerant.
With strong systems, clear guidance, and good context, it can move your work and business at 100x speed.
But sloppy prompts with no real architecture underneath? It just makes you produce mediocre output faster — and at scale.
@jogicodes I wouldn’t say it is optimized for productivity, but I was shipping from Maia this morning and it was pretty incredible. Great salted coffee for a reasonable price too.