@iamchrislaurent@zed_run Ship has sailed, we tried to warn you. The downfall was tanking everyone's assets by 95% and losing customer sentiment. Almost like you went brain-dead overnight. You deserve everything that came after throwing all your loyal users under the bus like we're nothing to you.
@idontlikewhatu1 @iamChrisEbeling @GeoffWellman@iamchrislaurent@ryantrost@zed_run You idiots who inexplicably defended his vision like he was some prophet, you guys really need to come out and take some responsibility. It is you who allowed this to happen. All of you that refused to use a tiny bit of common sense and see how flawed the vision actually was...
@RugmiRacing Yeah, it just shows how clueless the entire organization is. Let's be real, whoever signed off on @iamFcarril vision, or lack thereof, is just as incompetent as Facundo
@IntenseStables High base ability is what gives Z1s and Z2s value so the fixed breeding algorithm would necessarily need to incorporate base ability as the most important trait in breeding.
@Spotonparts @bg_alt The entire vision was/is illogical. There were a lot of ways to improve what they had, yet they choose to burn it all down for some basic numbers of a user base that doesn't exist.
@Spotonparts@spartandna Bro I already mentioned this earlier with you, were you not understanding? A simple function such as e^(1-x) can deal with such problems. If you guide BA passed on with it, it wouldn't be a problem
https://t.co/8ahdrsoilL
@bit_racing @bg_alt How don't you see how bad the team making the changes are? We simply want them fired and replaced with "competency". Even die-hard loyalists should be complaining by now. To endorse Zed at this point is just embarrassing🫢
@wagmiRacing@kkirk55 @bg_alt @DanZedRun It was just terrible logic, in nearly everything they changed in 2.0 racing and 3.0 breeding. In any business, it is essential to keep as much stability you can in your investor's assets. Yet this team rugged our best horses without consideration.
@z_velo_racing @bg_alt @mac_theblack @0xPaperhands Agreed. However, this conversation seems like a waste of time, Zed doesn't want a complex game where the entry level is too high. They just want users. We often look at the rationale of a specific game we desire without considering the appeal to users
@Spotonparts@notsostablecoin@CrazyHorseCHL @bg_alt @rap_ruby@zed_run I'm not sure why you think that's a hard problem, you can easily deal with that with a simple function. Something like e^k(1-#) values of k could vary depending but k = 0.02 seems reasonable
@Spotonparts@CrazyHorseCHL @bg_alt @rap_ruby@zed_run It's not even a question that an algo change will help. It's simply a fact. Look at the data @bg_alt has been posting since the changes. It's clear what the fun part was for the users.
@Spotonparts@CrazyHorseCHL @bg_alt @rap_ruby@zed_run Seriously bro, stop blaming the users, Zed does good things --> Users speak positively. It's painfully obvious the ones making these changes are incompetent. We'll complain until we are heard. Your blind optimism is nauseous
#loveyouroptimism