@asim_lfc@Carra23 Sorry, what am I missing? So you’re saying that @Carra23 is waaaaaaay out for choosing Salah as Liverpools top 6 ever player instead of top 5? Come on fella. This is beginning to feel a bit like click bait.
@TheCinesthetic Key tip: if you want the best experience from a blockbuster movie, listen to the soundtrack for a few weeks before the film is released. I’ve been doing that with all Hans Zimmer, Harry Gregson Williams, John Williams, Ludovico Enaudi and all the greats for years.
@chris_roberts96@talkSPORT I agree. I think in his ideal world the best scenario is big vs small clubs going head to head as opposed to two small clubs which would reduce viewership numbers.
@talkSPORT His first point where he mentions smaller teams in semi finals impacting the brand of football, I can understand (doesn’t mean I completely agree). When he goes on to say Leicester winning the league devalued it is utter crap. I get his point that some group stage matches pull…
@icecreamavfc@talkSPORT Small teams in the final is pure gold. All neutral fans would watch it. His point is not that. No one is saying small teams don’t deserve to win finals.
@drsportsmedia If we keep playing this midfield diamond that keeps us solid at the back, protects our midfield more and allows players like Curtis, Hugo and Wirtz to flow then it’s possible. But as soon as Cody and Salah return it will be back to the old formation.
@talkSPORT Maybe ‘devalues’ as a choice of word is what we are finding hard to accept. How about, ‘not as many viewers therefore not as much money to grow the brand’.. I’m just shocked that yous can see his view.
@James24474286@talkSPORT I’ll give you an example, Fulham vs Leeds on Monday night football or Chelsea vs Spurs at the same time, what are the masses watching? Would the brand grow bigger if those fixtures were always the bigger teams? Of course. It’s just the business view of it, not the emotional.