mvdwrd™️

Cannot cook, play the piano, swim, or code. Die trying.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@JoostJansen6 @ArnoWellens "Yoots??!!"

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

En zwarte domme wijvon.

[Sylvana Simons @SylvanaBIJ1]

Ik merk dat het volgende niet bij iedereen bekend is:

Er bestaan Zwarte moslims.
Er bestaan Zwarte Joden.
Er bestaan Zwarte christenen.
Er bestaan Zwarte atheïsten.

Etcetera.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

#afschrift

[Erik de Vlieger -Tweep des Vaderlands @DevliegerErik]

O
N
G
E
L
O
F
E
L
I
J
K

[leo @leoshimo]

Caricature of modern programming:

Building an LRU cache, with 10 people, split into two teams, where one team owns the `get` and another owns `put`.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

Look at this guy who still thinks the money is his, after depositing it in a bank account...

[Ian Miles Cheong @ianmiles]

Banks in Australia require you to inform them why you’re withdrawing cash, because they don’t believe in privacy and believe that all the money you own is actually property of the government.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

#ReadLater

https://t.co/cLfGd0ozc0

[Willis Eschenbach @WEschenbach]

Thanks, Dr. Roger, good stuff as always. Tragic to see Science buy into this nonsense.

Michael Chrichton saw this clearly:

"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks.

Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled.

Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics.

Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results.

The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus.

There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus.

Period."

More good stuff at the link.

w.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

This is the way.

[LindyMan @PaulSkallas]

The ham sandwich is the traditional food of France. It was for poor workers

So, this legacy means they never put enough meat in the ham sandwich so I always buy some more to add to it

Now it's a better sandwich

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@corinevloet Zo ongeveer... /s

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@Cortes

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

Don't you have any new wars to start? #BloodOnYourHands

[Guy Verhofstadt @guyverhofstadt]

Tucker Carlson is surely on the path to being labelled a propagandist for the Russian regime.

If he enables disinformation for Putin, the EU should explore a travel ban !

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@corinevloet Wat een verrassende plottwist weer...

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

”Honderd gulden?!
Nee, honderd piek! Anders geen foto."

[RTL Nieuws @RTLnieuws]

Kaag benadrukt belang veelbesproken UNRWA-organisatie voor Gazastrook | Liveblog https://t.co/DZyWoZU9f0

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@JoostJansen6 "beter uitleggen"

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@MiesBee Ervaar je ook wellness?
#dtv

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

Logische reactie van het cda nadat wij zijn gaan differentiëren in zetels..

[WNL Vandaag @WNLVandaag]

Het stroomnet raakt overvol met stroomuitvallen als gevolg. @CDAvandaag-leider @HenriBontenbal heeft een oplossing: differentiëren in tarieven. "Mensen die heel veel vermogen vragen van het elektriciteitsnet betalen meer dan mensen die daar een lager beroep op doen." #WNL

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

Binnenkort ook voor mensen die niet willen luisteren?

[Bert Brussen @bertbrussen]

Gentherapie. Daarom.

https://t.co/ToxcJEHqzP

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

@bertbrussen Gaarne gédaan.

[mvdwrd™️ @mvdwrd]

Michael Crichton was quite close to this iirc...

https://t.co/3pFpPY30Vt