🚨 PATRIOT! On this Fourth of July, let’s remember what real American patriotism looks like.
Baseball legend Rick Monday didn’t hesitate, two protesters stormed the field at Dodger Stadium trying to burn the American flag, and he sprinted in like a boss and SNATCHED it right out of their hands.
No apologies. No weakness. Just pure love for the greatest flag on earth.
That’s the spirit we celebrate today, defending Old Glory with everything we’ve got.
God bless Rick Monday and God bless the USA! 🇺🇸
My dad was dying. Then he wasn't.
68 years old. Retired farmer. Colon cancer.
The scans were ugly. The doctors looked grim.
I didn't accept that.
I put together a protocol from what I learned here:
72mg Ivermectin – daily
444mg Fenbendazole
4,000mg Vitamin C
32oz Hibiscus tea
Plus fasting. Sun. Real food.
5 weeks later? Tumor shrinkage.
The nurse cried. My mom cried. I just stared at the screen.
But here's where it gets wild.
Dad had this ugly spot on his neck. Basal cell. There for years. Growing.
I grabbed the same Ivermectin paste – farm store stuff – and dabbed it on that spot. 3 times a day.
One month later? Gone. Just… gone.
He called me this morning. Voice shaking.
"It's gone, son. It's really gone."
And me?
I started taking a smaller dose myself – 24mg Ivermectin + 444mg Fenbendazole.
My sleep fixed itself. I wake up without an alarm. Sugar cravings? Gone. Overeating? Gone.
I feel calm. Clear. Alive.
I know how this sounds.
Horse paste? For cancer? For skin cancer?
I laughed too. The first time.
Then I watched my dad's tumors shrink.
Then I watched his skin cancer fall off.
Now I don't laugh anymore.
I'm not a doctor.
I'm just a son who refused to give up.
And healing is always possible.
Even when it looks crazy.
💚
⚠️ Not medical advice. Just our story. Do your own research.
I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.
Step back.
There’s something bigger happening.
Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.
Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.
He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.
https://t.co/zc7K3lXLs4
Did you catch the part everyone missed?
“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”
Reminder.
Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.
The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.
Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?
“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”
https://t.co/A5rkX1ANnx
Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.
But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?
The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.
Why is that a big deal?
GAME THEORY.
Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.
Don’t forget:
The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”
None of this is a coincidence.
What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.
Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.
Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”
It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.
Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.
What did Trump do?
The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.
Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”
He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.
From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”
“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”
“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
———————
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.
Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?
Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.
What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.
The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.
American citizens are the product of centuries of patriots, pioneers, and visionaries who fought and died to create the most prosperous nation in world history. But if American citizenship belongs to any foreign national who crosses over our borders and gives birth to a child, then the very concept of citizenship means nothing.
Hello Mr. Kristol,
The verse you cite is from Leviticus, right alongside the passages on same-sex relations that you so readily dismiss.
But setting that aside, you're misreading the historical context. Leviticus 19:33–34 was written for Israel while the Hebrews were in the wilderness after the Exodus. There was no modern nation-state with fixed borders or an immigration system. Israel was a covenant community, not a country defined by territorial boundaries.
A "sojourner" wasn't simply someone standing inside an invisible border. A sojourner was a foreigner living among Israel who accepted Israel's civil order and lived under its laws. That's why the same Torah you hijack says there should be "one law for the native and for the sojourner." The defining feature wasn't physical location... it was membership in, and submission to, the covenant community.
Using Leviticus 19:33–34 as an argument against modern immigration enforcement ignores the historical and legal context in which the passage was written.
At what point does it stop being a conspiracy theory?
On the left is Trump’s post from two hours ago. On the right, is Q drop 4205, from May 2020, with (almost) the same exact graphic.
The only difference, is Trump added an “H.”, to emphasize HUSSEIN.
Coincidence?
How many times must Trump and his administration quote Q, use Q memes/graphics, share Q posts, etc., before it’s not an accident?
Worse!.... Texas now has a HIGHER debt to GDP ratio... than CALIFORNIA!!
Debt to GDP: 18.5% in TX... vs 15.82% in CA.
Insanity.
Another "bIg WiN" from "tHe MosT ConSerVatIve sEssIOn eVeR!"
"Abolish ICE" is not a legitimate policy position.
ICE is the enforcement mechanism for our country's immigration laws.
If you support abolishing ICE, you are telling Americans that they're not allowed to have a country.
You are telling them that they must accept their nation becoming culturally unrecognizable because you see it as nothing more than the world's economic zone.
You are saying that it's perfectly okay if Americans are assaulted, r@ped or killed by an illegal alien as long as they eventually vote for Democrats.
When a Democrat tells you they want to "abolish ICE," it's an endorsement of America's destruction and an explicit invitation to an illegal to harm you next.
@JeffFlake The character of cutting off healthy body parts of children, permanently sterilizing them, and harming their mental health? That’s the character you’re going out of your way to support? Over someone who would protect children from these monsters? Okay, dude.
Remember, there’s an exception to every rule called the Trump exception. When this guy’s fellow senior officers were being retired or relieved by Obama, that was OK. You certainly didn’t see him run to the Atlantic to write about it. But now the Trump does it in order to shape a military that conforms to the policies that the American people voted to support, it’s a crisis.
No.
We’re not doing that. We’re not playing the norms for you but not for us game.
Donald Trump has a right and a duty to build – actual rebuild – a military that the American people voted for when they elected him.
Powerful Prayer:
God, I come before You with an open and humble heart, asking for Your guidance as I pray.
Lord, I ask that You remove from my life anyone and anything that is not meant for me. Please surround me only with those who have pure and good intentions toward me. Protect me, Lord, and grant me peace regardless of the outcome. I place my full faith and trust in You, knowing that Your plan is greater and more perfect than anything I could imagine.
I release all people, places, and things that no longer serve my highest good, and I welcome what You have truly prepared for me.
In Jesus' name, I pray. Amen.
I received a voting guide yesterday from a member of the local GOP who endorsed a person for city council who was a democrat until she decided to run for city council in a red community. Wolf in sheep's clothing. Do your homework!