๐จ๐จ EA PRรDIT QUE L'ESPAGNE ๐ช๐ธ VA REMPORTER LA COUPE DU MONDE ! ๐๐
Pour rappel, EA ne s'est JAMAIS TROMPร depuis 2010 :
2010 : EA prรฉdit la victoire de l'Espagne ๐ช๐ธ๐ฎ
๐๐ฆฬ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ข๐ต : L'ESPAGNE ๐ช๐ธ REMPORTE LE MONDIAL ๐โ
2014 : EA prรฉdit la victoire de l'Allemagne ๐ฉ๐ช๐ฎ
๐๐ฆฬ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ข๐ต : L'ALLEMAGNE ๐ฉ๐ช REMPORTE LE MONDIAL ๐โ
2018 : EA prรฉdit la victoire de la France ๐ซ๐ท๐ฎ
๐๐ฆฬ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ข๐ต : LA FRANCE ๐ซ๐ท REMPORTE LE MONDIAL ๐โ
2022 : EA prรฉdit la victoire de l'Argentine ๐ฆ๐ท๐ฎ
๐๐ฆฬ๐ด๐ถ๐ญ๐ต๐ข๐ต : L'ARGENTINE ๐ฆ๐ท REMPORTE LE MONDIAL ๐โ
(@EASPORTSFC)
You have misread the tweet you are responding to entirely and the assumption you have built your argument on is not what was actually said.
Onto your actual point however. There is a fundamental and a whole world of difference between rights that exist within a legal and theological framework and the execution of those rights by fallible human beings operating within that framework.
Muslim men have denied the rights of other Muslim men throughout Islamic history. They have oppressed them, murdered them, deprived them of property, of justice, of life itself. The deprivation of the right to life is arguably the most fundamental violation possible and Muslim rulers and individuals have committed it against other Muslims repeatedly. Does that indict Islam as a system that does not grant Muslim men those rights? No serious person would argue that it does. The Sharia has explicit punishments for oppressors. The Prophet warned against them in hadith after hadith. Muslims greater than any of us have been denied their rights by Muslims greater than any of us. Islam does not promise in absolute terms that your rights will be guaranteed simply because you are Muslim. It promises a framework, a standard, a divine obligation on those in authority, and a reckoning for those who violate it. The failure of execution does not dissolve the existence of the right.
The same logic applies without exception to the rights Islam granted women. The fact that Muslim men have in many contexts denied, trampled upon and disenfranchised those rights is a genuine and serious problem that Muslims must reckon with internally, call out and correct. Nobody is arguing otherwise and no honest Muslims can claim so. But it does not constitute evidence that the rights do not exist within the framework any more than Muslim men being murdered by other Muslims constitutes evidence that Islam does not grant Muslim men the right to life.
And it is worth noting what is actually at stake in this conversation. The non-Muslims entering this discussion are not doing so out of concern for Muslim women. They are doing so to remove Islam from Muslims entirely, to use the genuine failures of Muslim men as a lever to delegitimise the framework itself.
That is categorically different from what Muslims seeking internal accountability are doing. We seek to correct behaviour from within, using the same framework as the standard. They seek to use our failures to dismantle the standard itself. You should know precisely where to stand on that distinction.
It is also worth noting that the non-Muslims making these arguments are not themselves exempt from the same charge. Non-Muslim systems, secular governments, Western institutions and traditional societies have all denied rights to the people under them including their own women, including non-Muslims, including entire populations.
The only difference is that when their systems fail they are not told the system itself is illegitimate. And they never make the argument themselves.
There is so much nonsense spewed these days, to cover up for glaring incompetence in managing security by deflecting through dog-whistling religion.
In Oyo for example, it has become the practice for these Yoruba Nation, TYF groups to routinely label Muslims as either Fulani or Fifth Colmnists who are not fit for traditional or Political offices.
"Rilwan Gbadegesin is a trained by Arab scholars in Fulani tradition of Sokoto, and so should not be the Alaafin. His grandfather Bello Gbadegesin Ladigbolu was a Fulani lackey" all these for him making "the mistake" of attending FGGC Sokoto, and his Grandfather being appointed by Awo's government after removing Adeniran Adeyemi, Alhaji Alaafin, giving Aare Ona Kakanfo title to Samuel Ladoke Akintola.
" Fatai Buhari is a Fulani , he doesn't have Yoruba names" , even though he is a 3-term Senator and Prince from Ibapon quarters, Ogbomosho .
This "bandits asked for Sharia" dog-whistle fits perfectly into it. It's to raise hysteria about Sharia, and bizarrely accuse Muslims of supporting banditry, even when Muslim victims are presently among those in bandit camps from Ogbomosho into the Old Oyo National Park.
This also becomes crazier, if one considers States like Niger, Katsina, Zamfara who have Sharia have been heavily hit by bandits, murdering Muslims even within mosques and not once in those places have they raised Sharia as an issue.
The agenda is to label Muslims so badly against the upcoming Gubernatorial elections coming up in 2027, because of their agenda.
They don't care if it's a lie, they just want to throw it out, and allow it spread for sometime before allowing it to be discarded.
It's all politics to them.
None of them ever deigns to question, the Governor Seyi Makinde, who severally over the years disregarded financial and administrative autonomy for Local governments.
It used to be case, that way back, vigilantes operating in local communities, were on the payroll of Local governments, patrolling bushes and getting intelligence scoops that were fed upwards.
Jacob Bamigboye, the HOA Member for Oriire, in 2022 specifically warned Oyo State government about insecurity in those areas.
One of the ridiculous attempts by these Yoruba groups is to dog-whistle Muslims and insinuate they are fifth columnists selling other Yorubas for Fulanis.
The attached picture is that of the courtyard of Balogun Ajayi Ogboriefon.
During the 1870's, the Ekiti -Parapo and Ijesha invited "these same Fulanis" to invade Ikirun.
The Yoruba Muslims, of Iwo (Momodu Lamuye), Ede, under Timi Abibu Lagunju and Ikirun stood firmly fighting hard to defeat Ilorin, under Ibadan standard.
They eventually did and defeated Ekiti-Parapo, Ijesha and Ilorin, ending in the drowning of Ilorin fighters in the Orin River, in Jalumi War of 1878.
Had the Fulanis of Ilorin, whom Ekiti/Ijesha invited succeeded in their war, the entire Ekiti-Ijesha will have Emirs now, for which they now try to deride Muslim descendants of those warriors who fought to keep Yorubaland safe.
When the British descended on Lagos in 1851, many Muslims in Lagos fought hard and when they lost,moved to Epe.
If the heroes against British Imperialism is to be called. One can list the Igbos (Ekumeku/Aro wars), the TIV, the Ibibio, the Benins, the Ijebus, the Muslims Yorubas, the Muslim and Non-Muslims people of Niger-Benue rivers.
One should perhaps ask the role the missionaries played in playing up the traditional rulers, acting as collaborators and Trojan horses, in signing forged treaties that the British then attempted to enforce in its wars of pacification all across the country. Treaties that were never explained to these rulers, or interpreted to them as succumbing their traditional authorities to the British.
It is of greatest ironies that some of these Yoruba Nation" "TYF" members from places like Ekiti, Ijesha who's great-grandfathers invited Fulanis of Ilorin, to take over Yorubaland , will be maligning Muslims
Nigeria is bleeding, but we still believe in Allahโs mercy ๐ณ๐ฌ๐
Ya Rabb, protect the innocent, end insecurity, and restore peace to the land.
May Nigeria witness safety, unity, and better days again. Ameen ๐คฒ
You must always make time for solitude. Because if the noise from society becomes so loud that you canโt discern your spirit, then you are in deep shit. Just like losing your mind, you can also lose your spirit.