I hope saudi arabia considers mercy for that man, especially since he has apologized.
Our prophet literally taught mercy and kindness for the whole world so i hope mercy is shown here too.
Where is Int'l Human Rights Organisation? They always seem to be asleep when something happens in other countries and wakes up when something happens in India 🧐
That's why India has never trusted these puppet organisations, which can't even comment on the atrocities below 👇🏻
Ironically, your bio says 'documenting hate crime and mob lynchings'
But you support Blasphemy laws and minority oppression as long as it doesn't affect you? How convenient!! 🤐
"Two wrongs doesn't make one right"
@imMAK02 If any god be it hindu, muslim, christian can get hurt by some words and he is not a god but a joker. And if there is rule there in saudi then that rule is stupid and should be removed.
@imMAK02 Shut the fuck up, killing anyone for any sort of religious reason is wrong and should be called out. It doesn’t matter what place that is, if you cannot call out that then these killing in india will also be justified. And no one wants wants that.
Why don't these Tamil nationalists (including the Sri Lankan Tamils) utter a word of support to Anojan Sivarasa? Every other day, you see them preach secularism to Hindus. Why are they silent?
Imagine if India started sentencing muslims to death for insulting Hindu deities. Muslims all over the world will start crying how intolerant Hinduism is and how fascist the government is.
Does this guy realise how many of his brethren can be locked up (or worse hanged) for the exact same thing if the same blasphemy rules are to be applied? Would be very quick to call it oppression & genocide lol.
No prophet, religion, or belief system is above criticism. And being deeply offended by someone’s words does not give anyone the authority to decide that person should die.
You can be angry. You can condemn what was said. You can challenge it, debate it, protest it, or simply walk away.
But no insult, criticism, satire, or mockery of Islam or Muhammad can ever make killing morally justified.
Offense is not a license to kill. Nothing makes it so.
While as a free-speech absolutist I feel India should shed all its blasphemy laws (8+ the last I counted), I also feel it should make an exception for this one species.
Death for any insult to Muhammad by a non-Muslim. And death for any insult to a Hindu deity by a Muslim.
While not ideal, they are killing for blasphemy and getting away with it anyway. Might as well make it reciprocal. At least then we’ll have the satisfaction of tit-for-tat and that maulana who instigated Nupur would not live to play chad at his madrassa.
It goes way deeper and sad.
>A dog accompanied hindu pilgrims for hundreds of miles. He was so adored that he became a local celebrity, named "Subramani".
>A muslim finds the dog and brutally kicked him and recorded the video mocking him with his name to agitate hindus
>Under th