@TheCarolErskine@cathyrusson They should not be permitted to have their phones, especially in the deliberation room. There’s a fine line here. People should be able to communicate with their family for emergencies, etc, but “scrolling”? That’s a hard NO for me
@DoctorTurtleboy I’m sure if he has an attorney or asked for legal advice about talking to the press, he was advised not to. Especially with the motion Reddington will file. “Anything can and will be used against you”. He can be subpoenaed
@SueOC_NBCBoston And most of the people that will do just about anything to get out of jury duty are the 1st to comment on a verdict if they disagree with it.
@conlin_lauren We Need to see the actual “question & note”. Exactly what the foreperson wrote. That should be public knowledge and it will be and should be if Reddington pursues with his motion
@BumpkinEsq I agree, it’s probably a stretch, but I enjoy reading and seeing both sides in a professional manner. Some of these “threads” are disgusting with no merit or facts.
I’ll follow along! It will be interesting where this all lands
@kelly_steffee@KristinaRex@NancyGrace is deplorable, in my opinion. After what I’m seeing with these jurors, I’d try to “get out” too. This personal harassment isn’t worth
$50 bucks a day
@TheCarolErskine@BumpkinEsq I actually like and enjoy seeing a respectful dialogue between two opposing views. Thanks to both of you! It’s certainly interesting