आज जब telecom और digital technology का इतना महत्व है... तब इससे जुड़े security framework को भी... चाक-चौबंद करना आवश्यक है।
Phone की Security और Network की Security...
ये हम सभी की प्राथमिकता है: PM @narendramodi
"130 million Indians removed from voting" - this is the propaganda being spread around the world now by a coordinated operation.
Let's see where this "130 million" is coming from.
SIR is a constitutionally required revision of electoral rolls as per a section in Art 324, 1950 of the Indian constitution.
The govt has to do it. It was last done in 2003. It must have been done again last decade by 2013, but it was delayed for various reasons.
The world's largest population, India, registers deaths of about 5-6 million people a year (Covid was higher. And as per these same foreign propaganda accounts, it was "millions more").
Since 2003, until 2026 when SIR was done, in 23 years, 138 million Indians have died at 6 million deaths a year. Or 115 million at 5 million deaths a year.
Apart from this, so many Indians migrated to other cities, towns, and states. So they will also be removed from existing rolls as they already have new addresses to vote from.
Now, during 2026 SIR, EC has only made a draft count of Absent, Shifted, Dead and Duplicate entries - and this comes to 130+ million. It is not even final deletion - the list is challenged by parties, people via appeals, goes to court etc to get finalized.
So this "130 million removed from voting in India" is fake news and fear mongering deliberately done to make the world believe "India has deleted 130 million eligible voters in some unconstitutional scam operation."
The fake news and fear mongering is being spread in a coordinated way internationally. Along with planted nothing-burger reports creating doubts on EC and a protest movement on the same in the name of Gen-Z.
The GoI is totally failing in at least fighting the fake news and misinformation.
They seem to have zero independent network to counter these 'paid to post' international SM influencers that don't look like an IT cell defending the govt.
As for any influence in international media - forget it, India seems to have ZERO, while pauper Pakistan seems to run whatever news it wants on major media orgs. Shame.
And Indians themselves are not being educated well by GoI on what's SIR, the need for it etc. Forget fighting the misinfo campaign at international level.
Such gaps in information, communication, and PR is so easy to be used by adversaries for planting their own fake news to turn even Indians against the GoI.
Apathy and ineptitude in fighting infowar and PR cost. No matter how successful we are in internal and external security, and in fighting traditional means of war against the country.
I have said this before and will say it again - everything from some deranged boys throwing stones on Vande Bharat, to a perverted group doing gang rape, to riots in some cities, to protests and huge movements for regime change, are all being triggered and run via Social Media.
If our own people can be easily turned against us using misinfo and fake news within our own country, and we cannot do anything about it, then we are still weak.
UPI Charges Row | Ashneer Grover Exclusive
If I transfer ₹1 lakh to my friend through UPI, or I pay ₹3,000 using a QR code, what is the cost of running the system? The cost is the same. So, if I transfer ₹1 lakh to my friend, nobody is making money from it. But if I make a payment of ₹2,500 to a small shopkeeper then the government wants to put charges, what’s the logic? — @Ashneer_Grover speaks to @shreyadhoundial
Spoke to Prime Minister Balendra Shah and conveyed condolences on the loss of lives due to the floods in Nepal. The people of India stand in solidarity with their sisters and brothers in Nepal at this difficult time.
India is ready to provide all possible humanitarian assistance to Nepal. Our teams are coordinating closely on rescue and relief efforts.
@PM_nepal_@ShahBalen
Some important points from the RHA Reservation Reforms Movement First Press Conference
RHA says it will take alleged police brutality against protesters to the Supreme Court and is preparing a legal for this.
RHA describes the protest as peaceful and says protesters came from different parts of the country to raise concerns about merit and what it calls draconian laws such as the UGC related issue.
RHA alleges that protesters were subjected to lathi charge and detention, including being transported away in buses.
RHA says official updates and demands are available through its Instagram page and warns that people claiming to represent RHA without authorization do not represent them .
RHA says its movement is about reforms, not simply abolishing reservation.
Demand 1 - National Commission for General Category: RHA wants a commission to address the rights and concerns of the General Category.
Demand 2 - Creamy Layer in SC/ST: RHA calls for a creamy layer provision in SC/ST reservation.
Demand 3 - One Family, One Reservation, One Time: RHA argues that reservation benefits should not repeatedly be used by the same family in education and employment.
Demand 4 - Minimum qualifying cut off: RHA wants minimum qualifying marks to be maintained for education and professional selection.
Demand 5 - Review of reservation: RHA wants a data-based review/white paper examining how many communities have benefited from reservation and how many remain without sufficient upliftment.
Demand 6 - Complete rollback of the UGC-related provision: RHA calls for a complete rollback of the provision it identifies as the UGC issue.
Demand 7 - Review of the SC/ST Act: RHA calls for a review of what it describes as misuse of the Act and wants stricter guidelines concerning alleged false cases.
Demand 8 - No private-sector reservation: RHA opposes reservation in the private sector and calls for it not to be introduced.
RHA says the movement is not against any particular community and claims its demands concern rights that involve all communities.
RHA says SC, ST and OBC members have also participated in the movement and that support from these communities is expected to grow.
RHA says the movement is not specifically against the government. It says the concern is with the broader reservation policy and the politics surrounding it.
RHA says the movement is not connected to elections. It describes the movement as the result of concerns that have been developing over a long period.
RHA says protests will be conducted constitutionally and with permission. If permission is denied, it says it will approach the courts.
RHA says it is coordinating with other organisations and meeting people from different sectors to develop the movement's strategy.
RHA describes the movement as people-led rather than leader-led. It says participants come from different places and share a common concern regarding the existing reservation-related political situation.
RHA wants to give the movement a clear direction, including communicating a common list of demands and appropriate messaging to protesters.
RHA says it plans to launch a website and helpline for protesters who need assistance and for people who want to contribute toward food and shelter.
RHA says crowdfunding will be the source of funding for the movement.
RHA wants judicial intervention against reservation politics, including political promises to increase reservation or introduce reservation in the private sector before elections.
RHA says it wants to move the country toward “progressive politics”, with less focus on caste politics and more focus on development.
RHA says people who voted for the government should also have their concerns heard when they later raise questions about government policies.
RHA rejects the claim that it wants to remove reservation, reiterating that its stated objective is reform.
RHA says SC/ST/OBC representation will be visible in the movement and on its platforms, and says members of these communities are already participating.
RHA argues that reservation and its implementation should remain open to discussion, saying that citizens have the right to debate the issue.
RHA refers to constitutional history and Supreme Court decisions to support its argument that reservation policy can be questioned and debated.
RHA uses EWS reservation as an example of economic-based reservation, arguing that reservation policy has evolved and therefore can be reviewed.
RHA says the movement will continue even if there is no single prominent leader or face, because it considers the movement to belong to the people.
RHA says its immediate objective is to bring clarity and organisation to protesters so that everyone communicates the same core demands.
Overall = RHA presents its movement as a reform focused, people led movement seeking changes to reservation policy, greater review and accountability, minimum qualifying standards, and constitutional/legal methods of protest.
I hope @talk2anuradha@neha_laldas@ajeetbharti has full video of this press conference and they will upload it on their Youtube channel or X or any other social media platforms, Also I request the RHA team to call top Social Media influencers to press conference who are supporting RHA Cause, also do the next Press conference live on all your social media platforms and announce it before hand on your social media pages so that people can join live without having to wait for some media channels to publish the press conference
@RHAreforms
https://t.co/dVnuMKtc4w
Do you know who slows Bharat down?
Not Pakistan.
Not China.
Not even the 0.5 front.
The biggest drag is the IAS System.
In 1947, the British left.
But we kept the Architecture.
The brown sahibs of India.
And the system was built not to serve citizens.
It was to extort from citizens.
The system does not reward outcomes.
It rewards survival.
It rewards tenure.
It rewards procedural safety.
And when survival becomes the incentive,
execution becomes the casualty.
A file enters an office as a newborn.
It leaves with voting rights.
Some files are not pending.
They are deliberately kept pending.
With the "Forwarded for Necessary Action" tag.
Officer A marks it to Officer B.
Officer B marks it to Officer C.
Officer C seeks clarification from Officer A.
This is our Administrative efficiency.
The safest bureaucrat rarely solves the biggest problem.
He simply avoids the riskiest decision.
No decision.
No signature.
No blame.
Career safe.
Promotion comes with years.
Accountability never arrives.
Today, Bharat has ~5,577 serving IAS officers.
~8000 are retired.
Cost to the taxpayer?
Serving IAS cadre.
Up to ~₹6,500 crore a year.
Retired IAS pensions.
Up to ~₹2,000 crore a year.
And that is not the whole machine.
Salary.
DA.
HRA.
Government accommodation.
Bungalows and their maintenance.
Official cars.
Drivers.
Fuel.
Air and rail travel.
Hotels.
Daily allowances.
LTC.
Medical benefits.
Transfers and relocation.
Training.
Phones.
Laptops.
Office infrastructure.
Electricity.
Support staff.
Secretariat machinery.
Collectorate machinery.
Security.
Pensions.
Family pensions.
Gratuity.
The government pays to recruit them.
Train them.
House them.
Move them.
Transport them.
Support them.
And finally, retire them.
But here is the strange part.
We can calculate almost every input.
Where is the public dashboard measuring the output?
Where is the public KPI?
Which Collector reduced file pendency the most?
Which Secretary delivered the highest policy outcomes?
Which officer consistently completed projects on time?
Which officer transformed public service delivery?
Which officer remained a bottleneck for years?
Where is the scorecard?
Every profession is measured.
Businesses measure profit.
Students are measured.
Teachers are measured.
Companies are measured.
Taxpayers are measured.
Citizens are measured.
Political parties are measured.
Why are Babus never measured?
And why is their promotion guaranteed?
Now, imagine an IAS officer.
He played ping-pong with files his whole career.
One table to another.
One department to another.
One decade to another.
Then he retires.
But the taxpayer doesn't.
Why should taxpayers keep paying?
For a career never measured by performance?
The British built this system to extract from us.
And we still live under its architecture.
While proudly calling ourselves independent.
I'm ashamed, I'm angry and honestly, I feel guilty that we've reached a stage where our soldiers are being mocked so casually.
There is something fundamentally wrong with our laws, our civic sense, and our tolerance if this is considered acceptable.
I just hope no such video ever reaches the families of our martyrs or our serving armed forces personnel. They have already sacrificed enough for this nation—they don't deserve to witness this. 🇮🇳
जय हिन्द की सेना 🫡
When the Education Minister had already held a press conference after the paper leak came to light, cancelled the exam, conducted a re-NEET, ensured multiple accused were arrested, announced the shift from OMR to CBT, and the NTA is already planning additional reforms such as conducting NEET in two phases (similar to JEE Main and Advanced) and introducing an upper age limit what exactly is this protest for?
If all these actions have already been taken, then what is the objective of the protest? It seems that the NEET paper leak is now being used by some as an opportunity to disrupt the functioning of a democratically elected government.
A thousand years ago, the first of many attacks on Somnath took place. Those who kept engaging in such attacks believed they could shatter the ethos of our land. But, they were wrong. Thanks to fiercely courageous children of Bharat Mata, Somnath kept getting rebuilt.
Seventy-five years ago on this day, the doors of the newly rebuilt Somnath Temple opened in the presence of the then President Dr. Rajendra Prasad, proclaiming to the world that while the attackers have faded into the dust of history, the soul of Bharat endures.
Somnath stands tall and eternal. It showcases our civilisational courage and our unbroken devotion. May the blessings of Mahadev always remain upon us all.
#Nagaland | Nagaland govt bans religious and NGO-based stickers, slogans and unauthorized signage on all vehicles. Owners must remove them within 45 days from April 30, 2026, or face legal action under the Motor Vehicles Act.
#VehicleRules#PublicNotice#NagalandNews
They called it a Krishna movement.
Everywhere I looked,
There was a Bhagavad Gita in someone’s hand.
On roads.
In malls.
At railway stations.
Even inside airports.
Young devotees stopping strangers.
Offering books.
Sometimes selling them.
Sometimes giving them away for free.
Always the same claim:
“This is the real Bhagavad Gita.”
But something felt strange to me.
How did ISKCON become the global face of Krishna?
Who decided this version was the authentic one?
That was when I started digging.
Krishna was born in Mathura.
ISKCON was born in New York.
That was my first Shocker.
Then I started digging.
July 13, 1966.
A 69 yr old Indian monk registers a society.
In Manhattan.
Under American law.
His name:
A.C. Bhaktivedanta.
His mission seemed sincere.
But what came later?
That is where the story darkens.
Prabhupada died in 1977.
Within months,
11 Western disciples took control.
They called themselves Zonal Acharyas.
They sat on thrones.
Demanded worship.
Controlled the movement.
The Governing Body Commission became the real power.
Today the GBC has 48 members.
Self-electing.
Unaudited.
Unapproved by any Indian religious authority.
No Bharatiya Sect controls it.
No sampradaya audits it.
It answers to New York.
Now comes the Gita.
The Bhagavad Gita has 700 verses.
Embedded inside Mahabharata.
Protected through centuries by living traditions.
Prabhupada released his version in 1972.
Through Macmillan Publishers, New York.
He called it:
“Bhagavad-Gita As It Is.”
The Current version is now distributed globally.
23 million copies sold.
56 languages.
Millions believe they are reading the untouched original.
Then came my biggest discomfort.
Not historical.
Psychological.
By Chapter 3,
something started feeling… off.
Krishna no longer felt like consciousness.
Or cosmic wisdom.
Or the friend of Arjuna.
He started sounding like a ruler.
And the reader started sounding like a slave.
Obey.
Surrender.
Follow.
Or fall.
The tone felt strangely familiar.
Not Dharmic.
But authoritarian.
Almost Abrahamic in structure.
A divine authority above.
A guilty human below.
Reward for obedience.
Fear for deviation.
That was the moment my questions became deeper.
Because Sanatan Dharma traditionally questions.
Debates.
Explores.
But this version often felt different.
Less inner awakening.
More institutional submission.
But the deeper story is copyright.
1972.
Prabhupada creates Bhaktivedanta Book Trust (BBT).
Separate from ISKCON.
To protect his books.
The Gita becomes corporate property.
India’s sacred scripture.
Legally reframed like company output.
Owned by an American entity.
An American-registered structure,
now controls the world’s most distributed Gita.
And hardly anyone asks questions.
Can Krishna be reduced to one organisation?
One commentary?
One corporation?
The Bhagavad Gita does not belong to any brand.
It belongs to a civilisation.
And maybe the real danger is how easily civilisations stop questioning.
At that time, Arun Jaitley executed an almost spy style operation
5 random BJP workers were dressed as MLAs and put in plane from Ranchi to Delhi, to fool UPA
Meanwhile, the real MLAs went by road to West Bengal in darkness of night
UPA thought BJP would take its MLAs to BJP ruled Chhattisgarh ... they never expected BJP to opt for Communist ruled Bengal
From Bengal, the MLAs caught a train to Odisha, and from there a plane to Delhi.
In Delhi, BJP's top leaders surrounded the MLAs to take them to Rashtrapati Bhavan, so that Delhi police would not arrest them
Such was the "honesty" of Dr. Singh.