narikm44

A simple atheist, i always block stupid.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@EasyGoodDeeds Another parallel lord ?

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@Haqq_Follower And a totally neutral and empirically testable statement, even in your view, would be : "If you want truth, only accept scientific proven "

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@Haqq_Follower No. As we can empirically observe that only science can get a better understanding of nature, and the ability to use this understanding. A simple observable fact.

Science give us your phone, philosophy the 4 elements.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF @ApostateProphet No. Your "paradox" only show that you cannot use standard math on infinite series and that time theory A is wrong since 1905
Time is supposed to start at the bb..
Google is your friend

Plates can be moving while standing still.
No care given for "paradox"
https://t.co/XlyRVVGt3E

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Empirically false, because we had to add entities ( constants, forces...) to be closer to reality, the probability of a composite hypothesis to be true is greater than a simple.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Not true according to Muslims scholars, with sources :

https://t.co/JHFO9pvbqE

https://t.co/rrs7SBXXmX

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Special pleading, my old friend, I need you again...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Therefore, by ontological reasoning, there is a better, more powerful god that yours.

Thanks for proving that Allah is not the one true God...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF No, or is your god forced to create ?
Or is to weak/ lazy to create in a non life permitting world and simply still force our atoms to keep us alive ?

Thanks for reducting the probability of theism...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF @Danzo760 @KhalilAndani @doofgeek4011 @aishpilled *give an argument reducting the probability of theism over deism*
-then you’ve misunderstood how Bayesian arguments like this work :)

???

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Why posit a second order ?

Brute fact too ?

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ThusEventide 2 is wrong, you missed a not operator, should be :
¬◇¬¬¬□¬∃xGx

Else if you use G as "Pi is rational", you "proved" that pi can be rational...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@de_radicalise @aminnasir1900 This doesn't respond to why he couldn't create a better world without evil, like natural ones.

Why couldn't he create only peoples that go to heaven ? Doest he already know who would ?
Free will without evils.

It seems your god is sick.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF Assuming a PSR, assuming no causal loops nor infinite chains...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@KawasakiBackF If 2 : Living entail pain ( to prevent life ending prematurely)
Living is positive.
Pain is positive.
Hell is pure bliss.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @_mathetes https://t.co/BEMtpLpE5D

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @LimeroChaos @proutpouette @Dodoleretour @JURASSIK_cedrik @AfoutK @TroncheBiais @MysterionNFS @Penseursauvage @DEFAKATOR_Off @DeBunKerEtoiles @TheSciencoder https://t.co/XlyRVVGt3E

Oui, on peut bouger et être immobile en même temps.

Aristote ne l'avais pas prévu...

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @_mathetes Bien évidemment que si, car au point où les trois états se touchent ( une bulle qui gele) si les molécules n'était pas dans tous les états a la fois, cela provoquerais une interface nette, opposé à la statistique, a la mécanique quantique et a l'observation.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @_mathetes Malheureusement c'est de loin la préfèré des scientifiques quantistes.
On dirait que votre logique aristotélicienne ne fonctionne pas réellement...

Relisez les tweets où l'on dissipe vos erreurs sur l'effondrement de la fonction d'onde.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @LimeroChaos @AXAVEN1 @Palladia_Mors @AfoutK @Penseursauvage @RocksDX50006620 @Dodoleretour @LePeloCharles Ok donc le coran n'est pas faux uniquement si on change les paroles d'allah ?

Cool 😎.

[narikm44 @narikm44]

@ServiteurDELV @LimeroChaos @proutpouette @Dodoleretour @JURASSIK_cedrik @AfoutK @TroncheBiais @MysterionNFS @Penseursauvage @DEFAKATOR_Off @DeBunKerEtoiles @TheSciencoder https://t.co/XlyRVVGt3E

Oui, on peut bouger et être immobile en même temps.

Aristote ne l'avais pas prévu...