so iโm pretty sure the team had the ability to launch at a higher FDV if they wanted to, and this was intentional to weed out users who were going to be dump.
i agree with a lot of your points but also felt that the typical โmarketing playbookโ launching at โhealthyโ fdv isnโt exactly working anymore
to put it superficially, u launch high, ure giving free money away and following the dying play book and having people dump the token. u launch low, only way is up
by concentrating revenue towards $dime the impact of the productโs success is amplified. that is to say of course that itโs contingent on whether they are able to get real users - but otherwise because they launched at shit Fdv, they still have lots of dry powder left to incentivise users on the app
how many users did we think were really going to sit around after a โhealthy fdv?โ
itโs in no way hopium but it does seem that strategically this โtgeโ isnโt the โtgeโ and they have shifted the honey pot finish line slightly further so that we donโt forget about the product that they are building, rather than a short term publicity success of โhey we launched at xxx FDVโ thatโs gg wane off
that being said can agree that comms shld be handled better
Today, you really cannot focus on climbing the corporate ladder, relying on a monthly salary, or even building a traditional cash-flow business. These are all dangerous. You need to be invested, deeply invested, in the assets that have the most to gain from a rapidly changing world and environment. It is unlikely that you will be able to outpace the current winners when it comes to AI, robotics.
Simultaneously, we are navigating a massive restructuring of the geopolitical order. The era of easy globalization is ending.
Central banks are trapped in a cycle where they must devalue currency to service debt. In this environment, holding cash or relying on fixed income is a guaranteed way to lose purchasing power. The financial currents are moving too fast. If you are not invested you are immediately behind.
The only true hedge against this dual tsunami of AI deflation and monetary inflation is ownership.
We are moving into an era where the divide will not be between the "rich and poor," but between those who own the infrastructure of the future and those who are just users of it. The vast majority of future wealth will accrue to the assets that benefit from these shifts:
Do not labor to compete with the machine, own the machine. Put every last dollar in the machine. Or be left behind.
d1- d3 of clawdbot journey:
there are so many tweets out there talking about how easy it is to set up, make money etc. no one talks about the friction - here's an open reflection.
1) setting up
- plenty of amazing guides out there, but so many errors. used chatgpt to guide me
still this is all very cool tech ๐ and im still new to all of this! very excited to continue updating my journey and if you are on it too, id like to follow your journey
5) The reality is that its going to take time before your bot makes money - it has to learn and you have to spend a lot of time teaching it.
here's what my bot said after i shared several automated trading success tweets with it.