I'd rather be the Marcus Aurelius type. Lead with honor. Build things that matter. Not manipulate my way to the top.
Sometimes AI tells you more about the world than about yourself.
I asked ChatGPT to recommend 3 books for my career. The third one made me go: WHAT?
1. "The Goal" by Goldratt -- bottleneck theory. Amazing for growth.
2. "Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius -- gave me actual chills.
3. "The 48 Laws of Power" -- the anti-Bible.
"The 48 Laws of Power" has advice like:
"Use selective honesty to disarm your victim." Actual quote.
"Get others to do the work for you but always take the credit." Another actual quote.
GPT, are you crazy? If THIS is what success requires... forget success.
Here's what nobody tells you about how big companies work.
Once they reach a certain size, they stop behaving like businesses. They start behaving like governments.
C-levels who haven't shipped anything hands-on in decades. The job becomes about influence. Power dynamics.
When you're under pressure for fast results:
β Speed up activation
β Fix your trial experience
β Follow up on webinar attendees
β Nurture demo requests that went quiet
Work the funnel you already have before you build a new one.
Every quarter, same story: "We need massive pipeline. New logos. By yesterday."
And every quarter, teams scramble to cold-outreach their way to a number that was never realistic.
Here's what nobody wants to hear: the fastest revenue isn't at the top of the funnel.
It's in the middle and bottom.
You already have people who signed up, started a trial, attended a webinar. They raised their hand. They know you exist.
Why are we ignoring them to chase strangers?
I pay Anthropic $100/month. Most expensive personal subscription I have.
And I'm genuinely happy every time I pay it. Because the value is obvious every single day.
That's what you're aiming for. Activate first. Revenue follows.
I signed up for an app. Haven't seen a single feature. Don't know if anyone uses it.
It's already asking me to pay. Yearly.
Your entire funnel is: awareness β revenue. That's not how anything works.
The best products follow three steps:
1. Activate β let me see the value
2. Adopt β let me build it into my workflow
3. Monetize β now I'm happy to pay
That's product-led growth. Not "pay me before you've tried me."
The best leadership example I know is over 300 years old.
Jan III Sobieski spent years learning enemy languages and studying their tactics.
Then he led the charge himself and defeated the Ottoman Empire at Vienna.
Real leaders do the homework.
Then lead from the front.
True demand generation means ZERO initial demand. Nobody knows your product. Nobody's searching for it. You have to make people aware, make them want it, AND make them willing to pay.
That's insanely hard.
Most "demand gen" JD? They describe demand capture.
Unpopular opinion: most "demand generation" roles aren't generating demand. They're capturing it.
If buyers are already searching for the problem you solve, that's demand capture.
Nothing wrong with that. But the strategy is completely different. Know which game you're playing.
Signal crossing = combining multiple data signals to build experiments nobody else is running.
Example: an HR company matching hiring signals with funding announcements, then designing campaigns around the
exact motivations from closed deals.
That's how growth compounds.
The most powerful growth framework I use: revenue loops.
1. Find content with highest revenue attribution
2. Analyze why it works
3. Get it in front of more people
4. Create more like it
Simple. But the real power? Signal crossing.
The biggest mistake I see in growth teams: they're solving the wrong problem.
"We can't tell which ad variants are driving results." Out of 10 campaigns, ONE generated revenue.
You don't have an attribution problem. You have a revenue problem.
Start with revenue. Work backwards.
Nobody gets fired for a well-formatted internal report.
But launching a campaign that flops? Visible. Scary.
So smart people hide in internal work. Strategy docs. Alignments. Reviews.
It feels productive. Nothing hits the market.
A bad launch beats a perfect plan that never ships
AI is a multiplier. Everyone agrees on that.
But nobody asks: a multiplier of what?
Organized β multiplies throughput
Disorganized β multiplies noise
I've seen teams use AI to generate 50 internal documents nobody reads.
That's not productivity. That's pollution.