Introduction to Anapana Meditation for Children
Joining information for Anapana for Children
Event : 6.00 PM India Time (+5.30 GMT)
Joining Link: https://t.co/CBK0gJxiUC...
Event Password: 1234
We all encounter bugs like this every day. Why? Well, I have a theory: many testers are in some form of single focus–on test cases, test scripts, APIs, given/when/then... Many of those forms drive testers away from something really important: interacting with the damned product.
When we rush development, skip tests and refactoring, we get “Escalating Risk.” Please give up the “technical debt” description; it gives businesspeople a very wrong impression of the tradeoffs.
From @Janellekz#deliverAgile
Check out Rapid Software Testing (https://t.co/8ZW8ELHSeG) for yourself (https://t.co/HPzcTNBZPv) to find out why you want to register for RST Explored (https://t.co/V7VpiNkIZP) in Zurich, May 15-17 (https://t.co/fE4IEKf3RS). And please tell friends!
As part of the process of relaunching @jamesmarcusbach’s Web site (https://t.co/N1n129gOjp), we’ve also revised https://t.co/pNTOhPtpFz. That includes some new writing on why we test, and what we mean by “Rapid”. https://t.co/8ZW8ELHSeG
In this interview, @michaelbolton discusses the absurdity of #projectmanagers requiring #testers to sign off on a product. Testers cannot assure the quality of the product, so Bolton makes suggestions for how to handle this request https://t.co/rJSuWL5V02
As Harry Collins notes in /Tacit and Explicit Knowledge/, no one paid much attention to tacit knowledge until long after knowledge became explicit. Similarly, few noticed ET until @DrCemKaner named it and with others (prominently @jamesmarcusbach) contrasted it with scripting.
Looking out for coding bad habits can help testers too :). new TESTHEAD: Write it on Your Hand: a #30DaysOfTesting Testability #t9y ... https://t.co/38AmgfZOtC
"No user would ever do that." Pretty much every tester has heard someone say it at some point. How do you reply? From the Vault, here are some ideas. https://t.co/VBcwfnP9eZ
The product probably *can* work, and your testing can probably show that fairly easily.
If your testing isn't oriented towards finding out how the product *isn’t* working, or *might not* work, then your testing isn’t working.
4) Good strategy for deep testing includes variation and diversification. Beware of obsessive focus or compulsive repetition. Revisit parts of the product when risk is high and/or when you haven’t looked at them lately. Explore around to reveal unanticipated risk.
3) This does not mean you must repeat your deep testing all the time, on every build, prompted by every change to the product. But do consider some deep testing focused on some important elements of coverage or risk now, and on other elements next time. Revisit them occasionally.
2) This does not mean that fast, cheap, shallow, repeated tests—and checks—aren’t valuable. They often are. But by definition, they aren’t targeted towards rare, subtle, hidden, intermittent, emergent bugs. To find those (before your customers do), you’ll need deeper testing.
1) There’s a common misconception about testing: that whatever we’ve tested, we must always test it again, every time, and forever. This misconception creates a bias in favour of fast, cheap, shallow, repeated tests. Yet variation is essential to broader and deeper coverage.
When managers tell you to automate all the testing, try telling them you can’t do it, because they’ve just told you the machines are supposed to be doing that.
It was a great spur of the moment interview (@chandrarsrikant style). The trust b/w founder and investor takes effort to build, but, when it is aligned to get the best out of each other for the company, magic happens. A proud day for me to be standing next to @mrgirish