NBAHogBoy

🗿#IOwnSME #IOwnTKN #IOwnBS #IOwnKGC #IOwnDFZ

[Anthony Brian Logan (ABL) 🇺🇸 @ANTHONYBLOGAN]

Another female juror in the Lindsay Clancy case has come forward to say that other jurors wanted to acquit Lindsay from the very beginning.

The unidentified juror says she initially thought Lindsay was guilty but she was seated by the others.

Video: CBS Boston

[Buck Sexton @BuckSexton]

Emotionally volatile, sanctimonious white liberal women with 80-ish IQs are a much bigger threat to our civilization than Iran or Russia

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

"She was judged by a jury of her peers"

The peers in question:

[Diana Villiers @DianaVilliers1]

This woman just said - with a straight face, in an interview she knew would be seen by the whole world - that she found the lack of “compassion” from the prosecution in a murder trial were three babies were arranged to be “biased” and “cold”. And that this affected her “right out if the gate”

Tell me more about how the “holdout” juror was misapplying the law and not properly evaluating evidence.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

[Sean Davis @seanmdav]

The judge in the Clancy case needs to hold contempt of court hearings for the nurse jurors who reportedly ignored expert witness testimony and brought in external information (who could possibly understand the information without an external background lecture from nurses on the jury), rather than relying on expert witness testimony, and then used that to attempt to bully a juror into agreeing with them.

[Cimmerian Pervert @cimmerian_v]

We need a hanged jury

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

Lindsay Clancy jurors giggle over how “entertaining” & “compassionate” Kevin Reddington was.

“Just his whole demeanor was funny…”

Totally insane. There was zero chance of a guilty verdict because the female jurors were in love with Clancy’s attorney.

[NBAHogBoy @NBA_HogBoy]

@HeismanHoney I’m available.

[NBAHogBoy @NBA_HogBoy]

@RAZ0RBACKS @BillyHogT Let Arkansas Sydney Sweeney suck it from the back.

[🜲 @RAZ0RBACKS]

If Arkansas beats Utah this weekend I will do whatever the top comment says

[Cliff @cliffordmain69]

There are supposed to be 1 billion of these, but instead we “won” World War 2

[NBAHogBoy @NBA_HogBoy]

@RamboMizzou @footballlady24 I’m so sorry to hear this Rambo. You and your family have my condolences and prayers you find you the closure you guys need.

[Geeky REAL GINGER Sparkles @desert_starr_57]

Wait..wait…wait…before they said that none of them were getting SNAP benefits and now they are suing to keep them getting benefits.

Ffs. This is total BS.

[Kelly McCarty @KellyLMcCarty]

Next up: Lower your grocery bill by simply eating less.

[PoliticsGirl @IAmPoliticsGirl]

The $16 M went somewhere, but it wasn’t to the pool.

[Maine @TheMaineWonk]

BIDEN: Let’s wipe out $23 billion in student loan debt, pass paid leave and stimulate the economy.

MAGA: COMMIE!

TRUMP: Let’s spend $100 billion on war in Iran, launch trade wars, increase prices, triple my net worth & break the economy for working people.

MAGA:

[sean @_sn_n]

this aged well

[Libertarians against Trump @libertariansag]

Me: "Diesel is $6, the national debt is exploding, and we’re dragging the country into another neocon war in Iran."

MAGA: "Oh, so you want a 6'3 guy with a beard playing women’s sports under Kamala?!"

It's wild how they use culture war slop to shield Trump from his failures.

[W. @WilliamCDC]

El vídeo que me manda mi mamá preguntándome si es IA.