@gmanews Hindi yun sayang. That was a very good strategy. Ever since defense decided not to do alternating presentation per article, there's already the possibility of dropping other articles. Art 1, 3,4 will be setting fall guys as hinted during the cross by defense.
@ANCALERTS Ganun naman talaga ang normal nangyayari sa mga kaso, kahit na decisionan na, meron affidavit of desistance para maurong ang kaso. Di ba alam ni karen yan? Hmmm
@Zandroid18@ultskztzy Defense was not denied opportunities to tell their side. It was defense decided they will wait until everything is out until they present theirs. Cases withdrawn. Defense can now directly tell all without being cross examined. Nothing right now stops defense to tell all.
@newswatchplusph If defense believed the 3 dropped articles of impeachment lacked basis, then they should be happy. Now they can only focus on one. So what's the fuss? They can just hold presscons to show what they have without the burden of cross examination - believable or not.
@jesusfalcis Why is Chiz giving so much airtime to Sen Padilla's or the defense senator judges which is very unfair to other senator judges that are actually doing their jobs.
@PhilippineStar It won't matter if the time deposit is only by FPRRD but what should be known is the settlement account which clearly goes to the joint account itself. It's absurd to say VP doesn't know about the account.
@gmanews This lawyer Atty. Mark "do you have personal knowledge" Vinluan always use this tagged phrase question to witnesses knowing they are relying on system-based reports. 😂🤣😅🤭🤫
@News5PH Mali ang line of questioning. Pina ikot-ikot pa. Dapat direct to the point na sana sila. Change the tactic of building premise kapag hostile witness.
@imtheatan He knows and the family knows. They've been in business and impossible to just say he doesn't know. It should open a case from DILG. There are cases of suspension and dismissal much lighter than this level of absurdity. Sa bisaya pa... "Estoryahe"
@gmanews Nung lumabas yung 18 so-called marines about maleta, dapat paniwalaan. Kahit sa daming revision via Atty. Baligod, true pa din daw. Ayaw naman humarap sa DOJ, NBI. Ngayon, dumaan muna sa NBI at DOJ bago announce, hindi true. So, abangan ang susunod na balita. 🤔😂🤫
@gmanews@Joseph_Morong Why they won't raise it to SC? Because there is no damage or injury since no verdict yet. Ongoing pa ang impeachment hearings. Premature filing will surely be dismissed.
@EL_FlLIBUSTER0 What if the SC does not rule in favor of the challengers? Then that would be a big a slap in the face. So may mga maleta naman ulit mga SC judges? I even doubt they would really challenge it in the SC.
@Prokopio The reliance in the number instead of defending thru merits is the only clear thing the defense have. Now that barrier is broken, the obvious use of ojt-like impeachment team now becomes a true laughing matter. The bias of the minority is never about justice & accountability
@roseplazo Defense cannot defend based on merits. As if the people would actually sympathize with them. The people wants to see accountability and justice. Even if they go to the SC, still it will not prosper. Drama to the max nalang kulang. hehehe