@StopOxevision@NSUNnews Powerful animation. Privacy is vital for flourishing and being under surveillance is degrading. Services often think privacy is just about not leaving notes out rather than enjoying time when you are unobserved. Text 2 was not on screen long enough for me to read it all....
I asked NHS England for their resources related to a course they are running on how to engage with patients and the public. It turns out that they are secret and can only be shared with NHS staff. Coproduction?
All my stuff is free at https://t.co/fukAT4mRgy
@burton_bcc Hello - I have just spent 20 minutes looking online for an address where Pembrokeshire's Burton Cricket Club meets. Can anyone solve the mystery, please?
How do you publish your Community Asset Map and meet your confidentiality and copyright obligations? Do these rules get in the way of coproduction? Thanks for your thoughts on this.
@dr_know Great thread. Public Contributors are often viewed as passive recipients of a system designed by professionals thinking ethically. Try reframing Public Contributors as Citizen Ethicists, constantly alerting the whole team to ethical aspects of the work. https://t.co/hpInFXOhOP
I'm fundraising for solar lights for a girls school in Sierra Leone. 25 new students start on 3 September and each one needs a Sun King Pro 200 costing £37. Eco solution that will light the whole household after sundown at 7pm. Please message me if you would like to fund a light.
@RachelStocker I'm an occasional PPI facilitator (not an eBe or researcher). I have a few personal reflections on these and other overlapping roles at https://t.co/jfDIT3BAVv
GDPR covers confidential records held by an identifiable organisation that then has responsibility to store, correct and destroy. Once a Youtube video is released, it is no longer confidential and has moved into Comms.
Before the pandemic, Hoddinott et al said that a recording of a meeting with Public Contributors should be destroyed as soon as the minutes are written & keeping it longer would need approval from a research ethics committee. Then came MS Teams. What should we do and why, please?
Hoddinott P, Pollock A, O'Cathain A et al (2018) How to incorporate patient and public perspectives into the design and conduct of research https://t.co/1R2ioYGhjp.
@CherylGrindell @lynn_laidlaw @dr_know@sharpcharlotte@AnnetteBoaz@HSRN_UK I have been reflecting on how Public Contributors navigate multiple overlapping roles and how the ensuing 'conflict of interest' is sometimes overlooked by traditional professionals, even though they struggle with 'work/life balance'. Musings to date at https://t.co/jfDIT3BAVv
@HeatherCassie77 Meagre attempt to set this kind of 'overlapping role' in a broader context - https://t.co/jfDIT3BAVv. The section on author/participant is weak, but the summary comments at the start of these notes may spark a thought. Please share what you find!
Nobody has suggested this is out of date, so I conclude that Public Contributors serving as co-researchers should have a Standard DBS check where they interview patients and no DBS check where they handle identifiable patient data.
Is this the most up to date statement suggesting when Public Contributors should be asked to undergo a DBS check? Since the Police Act 1997 makes it illegal to ask for an unnecessary check, it's important to get it right. See https://t.co/YVSWUJIu1b