@triffic_stuff_ If you take the opposite opinion on everything to this delusional and prolific ‘commentator’ you are sane. A period of silence from her would be welcome.
@pricedliberty @IRanMediaco Doesn’t matter. If the regime stays in power and can still throttle the world economy it’s strategic victory as they perceive it - and very hard for the US to portray it as anything else, whatever their undoubted tactical success.
@Mackenz46950920@JuliaHB1 Both VE and VJ surrenders were unconditional. Meetings between the combatant nations formally confirmed this reality: they were not negotiations.
@RudiFL22@JeremyClarkson@3YearLetterman My remark flippant, and probably merited your response.
As a British officer for 22 years, often alongside the US Army, I greatly respect it: vital for WW2 victory . But if the one country standing after the fall of France were ‘cowards’ you have an odd definition of it.
@Channel4News Pretty conclusive, subject to trial. Utterly despicable: if convicted they should receive the maximum sentence allowable for such a contemptible offence.
What were they trying to prove? Pathetic losers.
@afneil Completely agree Andrew. I have been on peacekeeping missions, and Rules of Engagement (designed as they are by lawyers safe at home) are always problematic in practice: here more than most.
@piersmorgan He’s past it. How can the US system possibly give its electorate a choice between him and (hopefully not) Trump? The US president must lead the free world with dignity, probity and credibility. Those two offer none of this.