@zalisteggall One question I've posed many times that none of you alleged greenies have ever had the courtesy to answer.
What lamp oil do you burn to light your home, or do you prefer candles?
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about:
🚨So here's the REAL story:
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.
Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in
Qatar by the CIA.
Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.
It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!
THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.
Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.
Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.
So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.
Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
Whoopi Goldberg learned the hard way that James Woods doesn't play by "The View's" rigged rules.
After Woods declined her ambush invitation, Goldberg called him an "ignorant, uninformed coward" on national television.
Woods responded within the hour.
"What happened to you, Whoopi?" he posted. "You used to be smart and funny. Now you're a DEI shill for wokeness. For the record, my Ph.D. in political science is plenty informed. I just don't do screaming matches with five angry women at a coffee table."
Goldberg has maintained radio silence since.
Another point for Woods. Another embarrassment for ABC.
There is something deeply satisfying about watching the giant fog machine fail.
A judge does something absurd, dresses it up in the language of compassion and theory, then discovers that an American Senate hearing is one of those inconvenient places where someone may actually read the words aloud and ask what the hell they mean.
No euphemisms. No activist jargon. No institutional shrug.
You wrote it. You defended it. Now explain it in public.
More of this. Much more.
This is the segment in which CNN defamed a U.S. Navy Veteran and was ordered to pay him $5 million for defaming him.
CNN also settled with him for another undisclosed amount for punitive damages to avoid a second trial.
The top is the segment, the bottom is the apology.
“We did not intend to suggest that Mr. Young participated in a black market.” Really? 🤣
In February of 2025 Rachel Maddow falsely reported that Trump had given Elon Musk a $400 million contract for armored Teslas.
The contract was given by the Biden Admin. Maddow's claim was completely false.
This is how she retracted/apologized for her false reporting. The next night, while her face was off screen, she quickly slipped in the fact that the contract was during the Biden Admin, and then came back on air, laughing like a hyena.
No apology. No retraction. No decency at all. Misleading people is the point of MS NOW.
If you're seriously considering voting for the Liberal Democrats, you must watch this.
@EdwardJDavey says he doesn't agree with @jk_rowling on the trans issue. This puffed-up patronising prat goes on to explain how he's “patiently” listened to his constituents who do agree with Rowling - because it goes without saying that one needs patience to listen to people who believe in biology as opposed to ideology…
And Davey generously shows the mindset of progressive cultists, because he conflates equality for cross-dressing men with racism and homophobia.
But Davey, a man with a brain the size of an amoeba’s toothpick, doesn’t grasp that gender ideology creates a conflict of rights.
Should men with penises be allowed into spaces reserved for biological women? Davey says “yes” to this.
Should children who are confused about their sexuality be told, “I'm sorry, but you can't change your sex. It's biologically and medically impossible, and if we just leave you to grow up and give you love and support, you'll be all right. You might be gay, but that's okay.”
Well, Davey appears to be on the side of those who say, “No. Let's trans away the gay.” Because, be under no illusion, that's what's happening, and Davey seems to be fine with that.
Just watching this man interviewed is like witnessing the thickest person I remember from school being questioned about anything requiring even the shallowest level of intellectual curiosity.
You can see the confusion in his eyes. He's saying not what he believes, or has thought about, or has considered, but what he knows he has to say, because his party has got itself into an awful muddle over these issues.
The Lib Dems no longer stand for women's rights. They stand for the rights of men who dress as women. They put the rights and demands of those men higher on their priority list than the rights of women.
And any woman who says, “Hell no, I want my hard-won sex-based rights,”Davey will listen to you “patiently” and then reject your views.
The end of the political career of this staggeringly stupid man cannot come soon enough.
🚨 BREAKING: Elon just nuked the entire media playbook in under 90 seconds.
Journalist: “You support the far-right!”
Elon: “No. You support the lunatic left.
What was completely normal 10-15 years ago is now called ‘far-right’…
because your side went completely insane.”
Safe cities. Secure borders. Biological reality. Common sense.
None of that is “far-right.”
It’s just not crazy.
The Overton window didn’t shift right.
The left sprinted off a cliff and started calling everyone who didn’t jump “extremists.”
Elon said it out loud.
And the media still can’t cope.
Lunatic left.
He’s 100% right.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
@Icehouseband I may be a primitive man, but I was so lucky to live, and grow up in This Southern Land during the times of Billy Thorpe and the Aztecs, Chain, Daddy Cool, and onto Rose Tattoo, Icehouse and so many other great artists.
It was a journey.
Still listening today, great memories.
Tommy @TRobinsonNewEra was released from his counter terrorism detainment. He made a video 📹 on Russia 🇷🇺 saying he'd not fight Putin.
He rightly points out we let in thousands of illegal migrants. Tommy believes Labour are more of a threat than Russia.
Karl Stefanovic gets sacked for interviewing Tommy Robertson in England, but its okay to interview KKK in the US just to make One Nation look bad? So are we going to be sacking people for interviewing and giving public attention to know racist/radical group with a history of murder, or do we ignore it and admit dual standards and political bias.