𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia|

☆ ex6

[𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia| @needexogen]

cant wait for this new era ❤️ im so exited just as the members are ❤️

[𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia| @needexogen]

im glad exo is having sm fun at their tour 😭🫶 they're doing amazing!!

[𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia| @needexogen]

oh the ironyyy

[؟ @zjik88]

everyone can see the pressure suho was under and how hard he worked, even kyungsoo had the crowd chanting suho’s name…
they’ve become very protective of him because of ot9/cbxls you fucking jerks

[ga🅱️z @NYUR7C]

260412 | 📧 eric on frmm

he talked about going to exo’s concert and how he cried 🥺

🦄 i watched exo hyung’s concert earlier
🦄 ha…..
🦄 legends
🦄 i felt how the fans felt
🦄 our deobis must feel the same way, right? watching our performance?
🦄 that’s what i was thinking
🦄 i also cried a lot..
🦄 so i held it in
🦄 just in case someone saw
🦄 most of all, there were so many songs and even choreography that i knew
🦄 i broke into the stage
🦄 we almost performed together
🦄 i’m just kidding ^^
🦄 i was that excited ~~~~ like that
🦄 we did a lot of cover songs ㅋㅋㅋ

[🍒 하트라인 ◡̈ @shyeolsoo]

kyungsoo messed up the lyrics in forever he said yeongwonhaja lol😭 look at chanyeol fighting for his life sjkxkxkdjsjsjsjs

[Exoxoxo @nosirco]

My unbiased opinion is that Baek Chen nd Xiu are in the middle of a serious money laundering company scandal which makes it hard for them to ever comeback in exo.EXO is on a sold out tour being loved once again in Korea. At this point bbhls need accept fate and Cope

[✮ @sunbleachedbuns]

but guys let’s be fr doing full on choreo, jumping around, and singing live for 3 fucking hours is fucking INSANE. in their 14th year, exo is still giving it their ALL.

[Fire on Fire @Fireonfire_CY]

260410 EXhOrizon
#CHANYEOL #찬열 #EXhOrizon_in_Seoul

[ari 💌 @oshcuddles]

EXO CRAZY HAS A DANCE CHOREOGRAPHY WE NEED A DANCE PRACTICE!!!!!! https://t.co/vYA4ObHQgV

[~G @exovertt]

doing this on the day exo tour starts. yeah it’s intentional. i don’t want them in exo anymore.

[𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia| @needexogen]

leave exo next pls

[BKK BASE @Boboholes2025]

Baekhyun Leaves INB100, Founded by Himself��� Notifies Chagawon of Contract Termination

TITLE IS SO FUNNY! HAHAHAHAHHA! Can't wait to hear Cha Gawon's side. Interesting what will happen to SM vs CBX lawsuit after this mess 🤣 CBX this is embarassing!

https://t.co/cPQc6JbkwN

[𝒍𝒊𝒍𝒐 ૮ • ﻌ - ა |very ia| @needexogen]

did cbx officially leave exo yet

[dee 𓇼 @blackoutIoey]

6 would get jumped so fucking bad if they ever said this btw

[🎧 @loeykjm]

cry

[thirteenzerosoon @yours459604]

BBH: Since I've already chosen the path I'm going to take for myself, I thought I could pick up a bit more speed from here on out. Now, I'll cut ties with everything I need to let go of and stand back up strong on my own once again

Official departure from EXO coming soon 🥳

[Dandansoo @Doh_KyungSooSoo]

Since they are only arguing in the QRTs about this one thing that they think is relevant to existing lawsuit between SM vs CBX, let me use this material you all putting in front of our faces.

Under your Notice/Clarifications:

"CBX did not lose a LAWSUIT"

• You're approaching this with word technicality. Yes, they did not lose a LAWSUIT because the appeal and re-appeals were dismissed by the police, regional court and supreme court BEFORE EVEN TURNING IT TO A LAWSUIT.

All appeals and re-appeals were dismissed by the respective governing authorities with valid reasons (as stated on my post below).

"Crucially, the court did not make any SUBSTANTIVE FINDINGS on their claims"

• SUBSTANTIVE FINDINGS are evidence-based results (will be based on documents that INB100 requested). However, their mere request of documents were validly dismissed by all courts because INB100 cannot specify the EXISTENCE and the SCOPE of allegedly unpaid settlements.
The very reason why all appeals and re-appeals were dismissed through procedural grounds in the first place. Meaning substantive findings are not crucial or even needed to dismiss their case or appeal.

"The revenue-sharing dispute is yet to be resolved by the court."

• This statement can be misleading for many
• The case about unpaid settlements to CBX were all dismissed and INB100 did not proceed any further. There is no existing appeal or lawsuit from INB100 now about unpaid settlements of CBX from SM. Hence, this case was all settled and done years ago.

SO WHAT IS THE CURRENT CONTRACT DISPUTE BETWEEN SM VS CBX?

• The contract dispute of the EXISTING LAWSUIT is about CBX's non-performance of their revised contract specifically about the non-payment of 10% share of SM to their individual activities' revenue. This is stated on the revised contract that CBX signed.

• This one was filed by SM and turned into lawsuit. This will most probably require inspection of INB100's financial records. (Important to note that it is INB100's financial record not SM)

Why? To determine the basis of amount that INB100 needs to be paid to SM. Whether 10% of REVENUE, GROSS PROFIT or NET PROFIT or any measures that the COURT considered deemed valid and reasonable.

THIS IS THE REVENUE-SHARING DISPUTE THAT IS YET TO BE RESOLVED BY THE COURT. REVENUE SHARE OF SM TO CBX'S INDIVIDUAL ACTIVITIES UNDER INB100.

NOT THE REVENUE-SHARING BETWEEN EXO MEMBERS. Hence, your "pooled revenue" allegations are unrelated and irrelevant to the current and existing lawsuit of SM vs CBX.

THE END.

[Dandansoo @Doh_KyungSooSoo]

Your post was the source of misinformation and misinterpretation of the fans about this "pooled accounting" system (which was never proven even true).

This has caused the fans to assume that all members shared profits from their solo activities. They made false narratives out of it and throw hateful posts to other EXO members. You can literally read the quote retweets of your post and you'll see my point.

That is the main reason I posted that article about EXO members themselves stating otherwise. That was a response to those false narratives and hateful posts.

As for this clarification post of yours, it is also important to also disclose the facts about this case and not just one-sided statement from INB10O.

“Thinking that this would clearly become a legal issue, I requested settlement data from my clients. In particular, Article 14 of the Popular Culture and Arts Industry Development Act mandates that accounting books regarding popular culture planning and compensation must be maintained separately. I even had doubts as to whether SM was conducting proper accounting.

Even from this statement from INB100, it is clear that it was their personal suspicion and doubts that led them to think that there was no "proper accounting" conducted. "SUSPICION" and "DOUBT" not FACT.

Then this suspicion was brought to PROPER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES (namely Seoul Court, Supreme Court and The Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism) by INB100.

As for the document submission order of CBX settlement data for the past 13 years, both Seoul Court and Supreme Court dismissed the case.

Seoul Court:
The court rejected most of their requests, saying, "The application for the document submission order in this case is sought and comprehensive by specifying the settlement data through document submission order, etc. without specifying the existence and scope of the unpaid settlement money."

INB100 appealed to Supreme Court...

RESULT:
Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial.

As for the request asking to view and register documents such as accounting books related to settlement:

Seoul Court:
This case application is being maintained to use this case application as a convenient way to achieve the purpose of document submission or to psychologically pressure SM."

INB100 appealed to Supreme Court

RESULT:
Supreme Court decided to dismiss the trial.

As for the case of violation of Article 14, Paragraph 2 of the Popular Culture and Art Industry Development Act (obligation to disclose the accounting book).

Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism:
No violation by stating that "through face-to-face investigation and submitted evidence, it was confirmed that SM periodically disclosed data related to settlement to artists in accordance with exclusive contracts and the Popular Culture Industry Act".

These are all actual court dismissals and facts that are important to know by the fans so they can have their objective take about this matter.

I deliberately did not include statement from SM side so you can save all your "company stan" allegation to yourself.

I rest my case.

[다니 @doKyungx0xo]

throne at the courtroom as the defendant

[god’s favorite @miumiuthong]

EXO literally went viral in Korea for their MMA performance, their last album was the second best selling of their career, and they have a sold out tour but sure if baesfilms says they flopped

[~G @exovertt]

ik im a broken record but i genuinely think its better for them to part ways cleanly. they ruined the group reputation for nothing. let the 6/5 who are holding on continue as they are