🇺🇸 If you loved Covid shots, you'll LOVE this
The FDA has approved the first mRNA-based flu vaccine, mFLUSIVA
Made by Moderna, the people who brought you myocarditis, this one promises side effects that may include swollen lymph nodes, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, nausea or vomiting, and fever
Sign me up!!
Just kidding, I'm never touching it
Source: CNN / Writer: Ian
Throwback to Jimmy Kimmel calling for the unvaccinated to be denied medical treatment at hospitals.
One of the more revealing moments of the COVID era.
Shock stat:
The US government is paying about $25 billion per week for interest payments on the national debt. $1.3 trillion per year.
About 42% of all income taxes, individual and corporate, goes to paying interest on the national debt.
$3.1 trillion from income taxes.
🇪🇸🇩🇰 Sánchez opened the floodgates, legalized hundreds of thousands, stiffed NATO, and blocked U.S. access to bases during the Iran war.
Now Denmark’s PM Mette Frederiksen is saying the quiet part out loud: the EU MUST consider suspending Spain from Schengen.
Denmark has now joined Italy, France, Finland, and Sweden in saying every option is on the table.
One of the biggest migration surges since 2015 just hit Ceuta under his neglectful watch...
Europe is done pretending this government isn't an unmitigated disaster!!
Source: The Local Denmark / Writer: Claudio
BREAKING: Borders collapse in Spain, thousands of military aged men swarming into the country.
Rapidly developing.
Spain's civil guard calls it a total collapse.
One of the main guilty acts of Fauci is not the claim that he got the COVID origin wrong at first. It's that he and his Lancet crew fabricated a certainty about COVID's origins they plainly did not possess -- due to entirely self-interested reasons (namely, their careers and reputations would be endangered if COVID had been caused by gain-of-function and other Wuhan research they funded and participated it).
They then weaponized that fake, deceitful certainty to label anyone who suggested a lab leak as a racist (which never made sense, since the "wet market" theory was always the more racist one), and then also used that non-existent certainty to bully and coerce media outlets and Big Tech to aggressively censor anyone questioning or dissenting from their proclamation.
The complete shutdown of debate, discussion and dissent over some of the this century's most consequential policies was one of the main crimes. That they did this not out of good faith error but crass self-advancement and self-protection made it all the worse.
.@nickshirleyy and @JamesOKeefeIII testified before the HSGAC with hard evidence of fraudsters stealing from hardworking taxpayers. Not one Democrat stuck around to hear it. That tells you everything about who actually wants the truth and who'd rather look away.
https://t.co/KRQIdNmn7l
Lazy legislators in Europe and in the United States who don’t stay until the end of their work days are responsible for some of the worst legislation in the history of their countries.
So happy for the Mail that they took on this entitled brat and won. Took real balls. Congrats Paul Dacre, Ted Verity, Peter Wright, and especially Lord Rothermere for throwing the very expensive kitchen sink at defending themselves from this loathsome hypocrite. 👏
This is properly insane: quite literally the worst example of censorship I've ever heard of anywhere.
I checked the actual ruling (which you can see here: https://t.co/dBKFWZ2ZWm) and, to be clear, it isn't just censorship in the conventional sense - blocking access to a website or removing content from platforms - this is the criminalization of information relayed by private citizens, with prison sentences attached.
And the most insane aspect if that it does NOT matter if the information relayed is accurate or not. It just matters that it originates from RT or other media outlets banned in the EU.
In other words, truth isn't a defense anymore in the EU, it literally doesn't matter. It's purely based on the identity of the speaker.
The ruling is actually explicit about this: the regulation, quoted by the Court says that the prohibition applies to "any content," and they draw no distinction based on what the content actually says. If it originates from banned outlets, it's banned.
It is, quite simply, a complete unraveling of the entire post-Enlightenment legal and philosophical project where entire generations of Europeans fought to move from "who says it" to "is it true" as the operative question.
Think about the absurdity of it: if RT publishes a video saying the sky is blue and you share it on a publicly accessible website in the EU, you'd fall within the scope of this ruling, making you liable to criminal prosecution.
Completely and utterly absurd. But that's the EU today for you 🤷
This Mamdani-style anti-American chic that gets gushing reviews from self-hating upper class neurotics is just a revived late-sixties/early 70s fad that was boring and stupid then, and still is now
🇺🇸 VP Vance: “If Watergate happened today, it would only be a 12-hour news story.”
“I think Nixon's historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance, and deservedly so.
The idea that it took down a presidency is crazy.”
The scandal that ended Nixon wouldn’t even last a full news cycle in 2026 💀
Writer: Val