Paired NFTs in theory work best if the NFTs are interchangeable with the coin.
Trade NFTs into the coin LP - pairing any NFT with any coin
0x1ee2A7c326805e094b2Ed4D06a95012296C8454B
Imagine your tokens are interchangeable with NFTs.
Your NFTs are backed by NFT collateral and vice versa
Now your tokens are actually worth holding, in NFT form
They are more than just tokens. There is redeemable value to them
"I think you're going to be able to swap them back and forth with coins"
"Thesis of having NFTs that are special segments of the coin / you can swap back and forth between them (NFT/coin)"
The foundation for this is now here with $OMNIBIND
NFT pairs have yet to be done properly.
With $Omnibind NFTs are interchangeable with the coin liqudity. This means that the price of the coin, and NFTs are intrinsically linked.
This bolsters floor prices, and base NFT value
https://t.co/V0zL8o3xCD
Evidence of a minted NFT here.
You can see the swap was achieved directly swapping the "DARK" NFT to "HoodieInu" tokens
The royalty fee that was set for the test is also visible on the transaction
https://t.co/kTBHsgNpn8
If I buy an NFT, and pay in ETH, what purpose does my coin serve?
With $omnibind, the price of your coin reflects the floor price of your NFTs. Your NFTs are minted in tokens rather than ETH
Most NFTs are just something you hold.
@lynksdotfun is trying to make them something you can actually connect to liquidity.
The idea is simple but interesting:
→ pair an existing token with an NFT
→ keep a fixed, visible reserve on-chain
→ trade the NFT while its backing stays intact
→ redeem when you want to close the loop
No separate NFT token.
No isolated liquidity pool.
Just assets, culture and liquidity connected through one system.
Built on Solana.
$LYNKS feels like one of those ideas that makes more sense the deeper you look.
CA: E8fsmahzoa4WGZ1dCnGBTzgXRxz9T7nC17KWGkzGxray